Skip to main content
Log in

Saving psychological Solipsism

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Baker, Lynne Rudder. 1987a. Saving Belief (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987b. “Content by Courtesy,” Journal of Philosophy, LXXXIV: 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1986. “Just What Do We Have in Mind, in Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, Jr. and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.). Midwest Studies in Philosophy: Studies in the Philosophy of Mind, 10 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985. “A Farewell to Functionalism,” Philosophical Studies, 48: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, Tyler. 1986. “Individualism and Psychology,” Philosophical Review, 95: 3–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1982. “Other Bodies,” in A. Woodfield (ed.), Thought and Object (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 97–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1982. “Two Thought Experiments Reviewed,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 23: 284–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1979. “Individualism and the Mental,” in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, and H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy: Studies in Metaphysics, 4: 73–122.

  • Churchland, Paul M. 1981. “Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes,” Journal of Philosophy, LXXVIII: 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel. 1987. The Intentional Stance (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT/Bradford Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. 1987. Psychosemantics (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT/Bradford Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1982. “Cognitive Science and the Twin-Earth Problem,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 23: 98–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1980. “Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3: 63–109 (including peer review).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975. The Language of Thought (New York: Thomas Crowell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Alvin. [typescript]. “Interpretation Psychologized.”

  • Grice, H. P. “Utter's Meaning and Intentions,” Philosophical Review, 78:147–177.

  • —. 1968. “Utters's Meaning, Sentence Meaning and Word Meaning,” Foundations of Language, 4: 225–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1957. “Meaning,” Philosophical Review, 66: 377–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert. 1973. Thought (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackner, J. R. and Garrett, M. F. 1972. “Resolving Ambiguity: Effects of Biasing Context in the Unattended Ear,” Cognition, 1: 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, J. Christopher. 1989. The Mundane Matter of The Mental Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, Richard E. and Wilson, Timothy DeCamp. 1977. “Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes,” Psychological Review, 84: 231–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, John. 1986. Contemporary Theories of Knowledge (Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary. 1975. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’,” in his Mind, Language and Reality, 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 215–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, Stephen. 1982. “Intention-based Semantics,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 23:119–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, Stephen. 1983. From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT/Bradford Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1982. “On the Ascription of Content,” in A. Woodfield (ed.). Thought and Object (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 153–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1978. “Beliefs and Subdoxastic States,” Philosophy of Science, 45: 573–591.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am indebted to both Lynne Rudder Baker and George Graham for helpful, critical correspondence on an earlier draft of this paper. John Pollock and Keith Lehrer generously commented on that same draft. Conversations with Alvin Goldman, Joseph Tolliver and Juanita Simpson have been helpful on the matter of narrow content. None of these philosophers is liable for those of my mistakes that have resisted instruction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maloney, J.C. Saving psychological Solipsism. Philos Stud 61, 267–283 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372356

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372356

Navigation