Skip to main content
Log in

Nuclease activity in human metaphase chromosomes substituted with 5′-bromodeoxyuridine

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human metaphase chromosomes, substituted with 5′-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) for one, two or three rounds of replication, were briefly pretreated with ultraviolet light (UV), in the presence of 33258 Hoechst, and subsequently digested with either exonuclease III or S1 nuclease. Pretreatment alone was not sufficient to induce sister chromatid differential staining (SCD), but allowed subsequent digestion with exonuclease III or S1. Such enzymes were found to induce SCD with ethidium bromide, as unifilarly BrdUrd-substituted chromatids (TB) were more resistant than bifilarly substituted chromatids (BB). Other experiments with DNase I or the AluI and HaeIII restriction endonucleases showed that only HaeIII was capable of inducing SCD by attacking BB more than TB chromatids preincubated with UV in the presence of Hoechst. SCD with exonuclease III/S1 nuclease seems to be due to (1) UV-induced DNA debromination occurring twice in BB as opposed to TB chromatids, and (2) alteration of chromatin protein structure occurring to a different extent in differently BrdUrd-substituted chromatids. Our findings with endonucleases, on the contrary, may depend on the capacity of enzymatic cleavage to cancel the different protein alterations induced differentially by UV in TB as opposed to BB chromatids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bianchi NO, Bianchi M, Cleaver JE (1984) The action of ultraviolet light on the patterns of banding induced by restriction endonucleases in human chromosomes. Chromosoma 90:133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi NO, Morgan WF, Cleaver JE (1985) Relationship of ultraviolet light-induced DNA-protein cross-linkage to chromatin structure. Exp Cell Res 156:405–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkholder GD (1982) The mechanism responsible for reciprocal BrdUrd-Giemsa staining. Exp Cell Res 141:127–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Buys CHCM, Stienstra S (1980) Involvement of sulfhydryl groups of chromosomal proteins in sister chromatid differentiation. Chromosoma 77:325–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabretta B, Robberson DL, Barrera-Saldana HA, Lambrou TP, Saunders GF (1982) Genome instability in a region of human DNA enriched in AluI repeat sequences. Nature 296:219–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantt R, Jones GM, Stephens EV, Baeck AE, Sanford KK (1979) Visible light-induced DNA-protein cross-linking in cultured mouse and human cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 565:231–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Gil G, Navarrete MH (1982) On the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromatids. Chromosoma 86:375–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Goto K, Maeda S, Kano Y, Sugiyama T (1978) Factors involved in differential Giemsa-staining of sister chromatids. Chromosoma 66:351–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock JM, Sumner AT (1982) The role of proteins in the production of different chromosome bands. Cytobios 35:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen MJ, Villanueva A, Juarranz A, Canete M, Stockert JC (1985) Photosensitizing dyes and fluorochromes as substitutes for 33258 Hoechst in the fluorescence-plus-Giemsa (FPG) chromosome technique. Histochemistry 83:241–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen MJ, Villanueva A, Stockert JC (1987) Induction of sister chromatid exchanges in Allium cepa meristematic cells exposed to meso-tetra (4-pyridyl)porphine and hematoporphyrin photoradiation. Photochem Photobiol 46:463–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist GP, Comings DE (1975) Sister chromatid exchange and chromosome organization based on a bromodeoxyuridine Giemsa-C-banding technique. Chromosoma 52:245–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson F (1973) The lesions produced by ultraviolet light in DNA containing 5-bromouracil. Quart Rev Biophys 6:201–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan KY, Pei-Fen Su, Te-Chang Lee (1985) Reverse differential staining of sister chromatids induced by Hoechst plus black light and endonuclease. Exp Cell Res 157:307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Karube T, Watanabe S (1988) Analysis of the chromosomal DNA replication pattern using the bromodeoxyuridine labeling method. Cancer Res 48:219–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato H (1974) Spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges detected by a BrdU-labelling method. Nature 251:70–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Korenberg JR, Freedlander EF (1974) Giemsa technique for the detection of sister chromatid exchanges. Chromosoma 48:355–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt S (1973) Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3395–3399

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzanotte R, Ferrucci L, Marchi A, Bianchi U (1982) The longitudinal differentiation produced by photo-oxidation and acridine orange staining in eukaryote chromosomes: role and involvement of DNA base composition. Cytogenet Cell Genet 33:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzanotte R, Bianchi U, Vanni R, Ferrucci L (1983) Chromatin organization and restriction endonuclease activity on human metaphase chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 36:562–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll M, Kornberg RD (1977) Action of micrococcal nuclease on chromatin and the location of H1. J Mol Biol 109:393–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry P, Wolff S (1974) New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids. Nature 251:156–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers SG, Weiss B (1980) Exonuclease III of Escherichia coli K-12, an AP endonuclease. Methods Enzymol 65:201–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiaffonati L, Tsutsui Y, Chang SD, Baserga R (1978) Effect of 5-bromodeoxyuridine on deoxyribonucleic acid-protein adducts induced by ultraviolet light on chromatin and cells. Lab Invest 38:58–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreck RR, Warburton D, Miller OJ, Beiser SM, Erlanger BF (1973) Chromosome structure as revealed by combined chemical and immunochemical procedure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:804–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon MI, Van Vunakis H (1962) The photodynamic reaction of methylene blue with deoxyribonucleic acid. J Mol Biol 4:488–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetka DG, Spahn MC (1984) SCEs are induced by incorporation of BrdU into nascent DNA. Mutat Res 140:33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubblefield E (1975) Analysis of the replication pattern of Chinese hamster chromosomes using 5-bromodeoxyuridine suppression of 33258 Hoechst fluorescence. Chromosoma 53:209–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Takayama S, Sakanishi S (1977) Differential Giemsa staining of sister chromatids after extraction with acids. Chromosoma 64:109–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt VM (1980) Purification and properties of S1 nuclease from Aspergillus. Methods Enzymol 65:248–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabeau M, Roberts RJ (1979) Chromosome structure. In: Molecular genetics. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–63

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mezzanotte, R., Rossino, R., Orru, S. et al. Nuclease activity in human metaphase chromosomes substituted with 5′-bromodeoxyuridine. Chromosoma 97, 334–338 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00371975

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00371975

Keywords

Navigation