Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 416, Issue 1–2, pp 113–119

Theoretical determination of force-length relations of intact human skeletal muscles using the cross-bridge model

  • Walter Herzog
  • Sheila K. Abrahamse
  • Henk E. D. J. ter Keurs
Excitable Tissues and Central Nervous Physiology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine force-length relations of selected human skeletal muscles, based on the theoretical foundations of the cross-bridge model and to calculate a strength curve for knee extension from these relations. Force-length relations were determined for the rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, vastus intermedius and gastrocnemius muscles, using sarcomere/ fiber length data form both legs of four cadavers and sarcomere geometry data reported in the literature. It appears that the two-joint muscles investigated in this study are not able to produce force throughout their full anatomical range of motion, whereas the one-joint muscles can. The strength curve for knee extension was determined as the sum of the force-length relations of the individual knee extensor muscles and showed good agreement with experimentally obtained knee extensor strength curves.

Key words

Force-length relations Cross-bridge theory Human skeletal muscle 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamse SK, Herzog W, and ter Keurs HEDJ (1988) Considerations regarding force-length relations of human rectus femoris muscle. Proceedings of the Canadian Society for Biomechanics Ottawa, pp 30–31Google Scholar
  2. Blix M (1891) Die Laenge und die Spannung des Muskels. Scand Arch Physiol 3: 295–318Google Scholar
  3. Campney HK, Wehr RW (1965) An interpretation of the strength differences associated with varying angles of pull. Res Q 36: 403–412Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter A (1938) A study of the angles in the measurement of the leg lift. Res Q 9: 70–72Google Scholar
  5. Clarke HH, Elkins EC, Martin GM, Wakim KG (1950) Application of muscle power to movements of the joints. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 31: 81–89Google Scholar
  6. Fick R (1910) Handbuch der Anatomie des Menschen, vol 2. Fischer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  7. Gordon AM, Huxley AF, Julian FJ (1966) The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibers. J Physiol (London) 184: 170–192Google Scholar
  8. Grieve DW, Pheasant S, Cavanagh PR (1978) Prediction of gastrocnemius length from knee and ankle posture. Biomechanics VI-A. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 405–412Google Scholar
  9. Herzog W (1985) Individual muscle force prediction in athletic movements. Thesis, University of Calgary PrintingGoogle Scholar
  10. Herzog W (1987) Determination of muscle model parameters using an optimization technique. Biomechanics X-B, pp 1175–1179Google Scholar
  11. Herzog W, ter Keurs HEDJ (1988) Force-length relation of in-vivo human rectus femoris muscles. Pflügers Arch 411: 642–647Google Scholar
  12. Hill AV (1938) The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond Biol 126: 136–195Google Scholar
  13. Huxley AF (1957) Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem 7: 255–318Google Scholar
  14. Iwazumi T (1978) Molecular mechanism of muscle contraction: another view. In: Baan J, Nordergraaf A, Baines J (eds) Cardivascular system dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp 11–21Google Scholar
  15. Kulig K, Andrews JG, Hay JG (1984) Human strength curves. Exercise and sport sciences reviews, vol 12. The Collamore Press, Lexington, pp 417–466Google Scholar
  16. Lindahl O, Movin A, Rindgrist I (1969) Knee extension measurement of the isometric force in different positions of the knee joint. Acta Orthop Scand 40: 79–85Google Scholar
  17. Steindler A (1977) Kinesiology of the human body. Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  18. Wagemans E, Leemputte M van, Willems E (1988) An ultrasound method to determine muscle structure. Proceedings of the American Society of Biomechanics, 12th Annual Meeting, pp 208–209Google Scholar
  19. Walker SM, Randolph-Schrodt G (1973) I-segment lengths and thin filament periods in skeletal muscle fibers of the Rhesus monkey and the human. Anat Rec 178: 63–82Google Scholar
  20. Wickiewicz TL, Roy RR, Powell PL, Edgerton VR (1983) Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. Clin Orthop 179: 275–283Google Scholar
  21. Wilkie DR (1968) Studies in biology 11. Muscle. Arnold LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams M, Stutzmann L (1959) Strength variation through the range of joint motion. Phys Ther 39: 145–152Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter Herzog
    • 1
  • Sheila K. Abrahamse
    • 1
  • Henk E. D. J. ter Keurs
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Physical Education, BiomechanicsThe University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Department of Medical Physiology, Health Sciences Centre 1663The University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations