Advertisement

Marine Geophysical Researches

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 203–208 | Cite as

Relationship between the seismicity and geologic structure of the Blanco Transform Fault Zone

  • Robert P. Dziak
  • Christopher G. Fox
  • Robert W. Embley
Article

Abstract

Morphologic studies of an oceanic transform, the Blanco Transform Fault Zone (BTFZ), have shown it to consist of a series of extensional basins that offset the major strike-slip faults. The largest of the extensional basins, the Cascadia Depression, effectively divides the transform into a northwest segment, composed of several relatively short strike-slip faults, and a southeast segment dominated by fewer, longer faults. The regional seismicity distribution (m b ≥4.0) and frequency-magnitude relationships (b-values) of the BTFZ show that the largest magnitude events are located on the southeast segment. Furthermore, estimates of the cumulative seismic moment release and seismic moment release rate along the southeast segment are significantly greater than that of the northwest segment. These observations suggest that slip along the southeast segment is accommodated by a greater number of large magnitude earthquakes. Comparison of the seismic moment rate, derived from empirical estimates, with the seismic moment rate determined from plate motion constraints suggests a difference in the seismic coupling strength between the segments. This difference in coupling may partially explain the disparity in earthquake size distribution. However, the results appear to confirm the relation between earthquake size and fault length, observed along continental strike-slip faults, for this oceanic transform.

Key words

Blanco Transform divergent wrench-fault earthquake b-value seismic moment fault length 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. G., 1979, Estimating the Seismicity from Geological Structure for Seismic-Risk Studies, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 69, 135–158.Google Scholar
  2. Aydin, A. and Nur, A., 1982, Evolution of Pull-Apart Basins and their Scale Independence, Tectonics 1, 91–105.Google Scholar
  3. Barka, A. A. and Kadinsky-Cade, K., 1988, Strike-Slip Fault Geometry in Turkey and its Influence on Earthquake Activity, Tectonics 7, 663–684.Google Scholar
  4. Bergman, E. A. and Solomon, S. C., 1988, Transform Fault Earthquakes in the North Atlantic: Source Mechanism and Depth of Faulting, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 9027–9057.Google Scholar
  5. Brune, J. N., 1968, Seismic Moment, Seismicity, and Rate of Slip Along Major Fault Zones, J. Geophys. Res. 73, 777–784.Google Scholar
  6. Chandra, U., 1974, Seismicity, Earthquake Mechanisms, and Tectonics along the Western Coast of North America from 42° N to 61° N, Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 64, 1529–1549.Google Scholar
  7. de, Charon, A., 1988, Structure and Tectonics of Cascadia Segment, Central Blanco Transform Fault Zone, M.S. thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 80 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Embely, R. W., 1985, A Locally Formed Deep-Ocean Canyon System along the Blanco Transform, Geo-Marine Letters 5, 99–104.Google Scholar
  9. Embley, R. W., Kulm, L. D., Massoth, G., Abbott, D., Holmes, M., 1987, Morphology, Structure, and Resource Potential of the Blanco Transform Fault Zone, in School, D. W., Grantz, A., Yedder, J. G., (eds.), Geology and Resource Potential of the Continental Margin of Western North America and Adjacent Ocean Basins-Beaufort Sea to Baja, California, Amer. Assoc. Petro. Geologists, 549–561.Google Scholar
  10. Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F., 1954, Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, S. H. and Jones, P. R., 1978, Microearthquakes Located on the Blanco Fracture Zone with Sonobuoy Arrays, J. Geophys. Res. 83, 255–261.Google Scholar
  12. Karsten, J. L., Hammond, S. R., Davis, E. E., and Currie, R. G., 1986, Detailed Geomorphology and Neotectonics of the Endeavour Segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge: New Results from Seabeam Swath Mapping, Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 97, 213–221.Google Scholar
  13. Kawasaki, I., Yasutoshi, K., Ikuko, T., and Kosugi, N., 1985, Mode of Seismic Moment Release at Transform Faults, Tectonophys. 118, 313–327.Google Scholar
  14. Mann, P. M., Hempton, D. C., Bradley, D. C., and Burke, K., 1983, Development of Pull-Apart Basins, Journal of Geology 91, 529–554.Google Scholar
  15. Northrop, J., 1970, Accuracy of Earthquake Epicenters on the Gorda Ridge, Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 60, 265–267.Google Scholar
  16. Riddihough, R. P., Beck, M. E., Chase, R. L., Davis, E. E., Hyndman, R. D., Johnson, S. H., and Rogers, G. C., 1983, Geodynamics of the Juan de Fuca Plate, in R. Cabre (ed.), Geodynamics of the Eastern Pacific Region, Caribbean and Scotia Arcs, Amer. Geophys. Un., 5–21.Google Scholar
  17. Scholtz, C. H., 1982, Scaling Laws for Large Earthquakes: Consequences for Physical Models, Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 72, 1–14.Google Scholar
  18. Schwartz, D. P. and Coppersmith, K. J., 1984, Fault Behavior and Characteristic Earthquakes: Examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas Fault Zones, J. Geophys. Res. 89, 5681–5698.Google Scholar
  19. Segall, P. and Pollard, D. D., 1980, Mechanics of Discontinuous Faults, J. Geophys. Res. 85, 4337–4350.Google Scholar
  20. Sibson, R. H., 1986, Rupture Interaction with Fault Jogs, Geophys. Monogr. 37 (Am. Geophys. Un., Washington, D.C.) 157–167.Google Scholar
  21. Spence, W., 1989, Stress Origins and Earthquake Potentials in Cascadia, J. Geophys. Res. 94, 3076–3089.Google Scholar
  22. Tobin, D. G. and Sykes, L. R., 1968, Seismicity and Tectonics of the northeast Pacific Ocean, J. Geophys. Res. 3, 3821–3845.Google Scholar
  23. Trehu, A. M. and Solomon, S. C., 1983, Earthquakes in the Orozco Transform Zone: Seismicity, Source Mechanisms, and Tectonics, J. Geophys. Res. 88, 8203–8225.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert P. Dziak
    • 2
  • Christopher G. Fox
    • 1
  • Robert W. Embley
    • 1
  1. 1.Pacific Marine Environmental LaboratoryNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNewportUSA
  2. 2.Cooperative Institute for Marine Resources StudiesOregon State University Hatfield Marine Science CenterNewportUSA

Personalised recommendations