Skip to main content
Log in

Where did I go wrong?

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Castañeda, Hector-Neri. Thinking and Doing. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feldman, Fred. Doing the Best We Can. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feldman, Fred. “Oughts — Absolute, Conditioned, Conditional.” Philosophia, 12 (1983), 257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goldman, Alvin I. A Theory of Human Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman, Holly S. “Dated Rightness and Moral Imperfection.” The Philosophical Review, 85 (1976), 449–487.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldman, Holly S. “Doing the Best One Can.” In A. I. Goldman and J. Kim, eds., Values and Morals (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1978), 185–214.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greenspan, Patricia S. “Oughts and Determinism: A Response to Goldman.” The Philosophical Review, 87 (1978), 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Humberstone, I. L. “The Background of Circumstances.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64 (1983), 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson, Frank and Pargetter, Robert. “Oughts, Options, and Actualism.” The Philosophical Review, 95 (1986), 233–255.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson, Frank and Pargetter, Robert. “Two Puzzles about Conditional Obligation.” Philosophical Papers, 16 (1987), 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McKinsey, Michael. “Levels of Obligation.” Philosophical Studies, 35 (1975), 385–395.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Plantinga, Alvin. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Slote, Michael. Common-sense Morality and Consequentialism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sobel, Howard. “Utilitarianism and Past and Future Mistakes.” Nous, 10 (1976), 195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomason, Richmond H. “Deontic Logic and the Role of Freedom in Moral Deliberation.” In R. Hilpinen, ed., New Studies in Deontic Logic (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1981), 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomason, Richmond H. “Deontic Logic as Founded on Tense Logic.” In R. Hilpinen, ed., New Studies in Deontic Logic (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1981), 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zimmerman, Michael J. An Essay on Human Action. New York: Peter Lang, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zimmerman, Michael J. An Essay on Moral Responsibility. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zimmerman, Michael J. “Remote Obligation.” American Philosophical Quarterly, 24 (1987), 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zimmerman, Michael J. “Subsidiary Obligation.” Philosophical Studies, 50 (1986), 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimmerman, M.J. Where did I go wrong?. Philosophical Studies 59, 55–77 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00368391

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00368391

Navigation