Skip to main content
Log in

Making use of creationism. A case-study for the philosophy of science classroom

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I describe an approach to the teaching of philosophy of science that draws normally reluctant students into controversial issues in the philosophy of science. I have found that the topic of creationism is a good vehicle for introducing students to the more difficult issues in philosophy of science. I explore the use of creationism as a case-study in the philosophy of science and detail my own experience in the creationism debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Broad, W. and Wade, H.: 1982, Betrayers of the truth: Fraud and Deceit in the Halls of Science, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, R.M.: 1986, ‘Why the Panda Provides no Comfort to the Creationist’, Philosophica 37, 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1859, On the Origin of Species, John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D.: 1983, Science on Trial, Pantheon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G.: 1983, The Philosophy of Natural Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.: 1988, Science as a Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1981, ‘Explanatory Unification’, Philosophy of Science 48, 507–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1983, Abusing Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1982, ‘Science at the Bar — Causes for Concern’, Science, Technology, and Human Values 7, 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavis, F.R.: 1962, ‘Two Cultures? The Significance of C.P. Snow’, Spectator, 9 March.

  • Marsden, G.M.: 1980, Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth Century Evangelicalism, 1925–1970, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, E.: 1986, The Creation-Evolution Controversy, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, H.M. (ed.): 1974, Scientific-Creationism, Creation-Life, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D.: 1977, Science Textbook Controversies and the Politics of Equal Time, MTT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Numbers, R.L.: 1982, ‘Creationism in 20th Century America’, Science 218, 538–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley, W.: 1802, Natural Theology, Rivington, London. Reprinted in F. Ferre (ed.), Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1982, Objective Knowledge, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1984, ‘Darwinism as a Metaphysical Research Programme’, in P.S. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Open Court, LaSalle, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, P.L.: 1984, ‘The Philosopher of Science as Expert Witness’, in J.T. Cushing et al. (eds.), Science and Realty, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1975, ‘Darwin's Debt to Philosophy: An Examination of the Influence of the Philosophical Ideas of John F.W. Herschel and William Whewell on the Development of Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 6, 159–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1979a, The Darwinian Revolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1979b, Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1980, ‘Ought Philosophers Consider Scientific Discovery?, A Darwinian Case Study’, in T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery: Case Studies, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1982a, ‘A Philosopher at the Monkey Trial’, New Scientist 93, 317–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1982b, ‘The Arkansas Creation Trial 1981: Is There a Message for Us All?’, The History and Social Science Teacher 18, 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1982c, ‘Pro Judice’, Science, Technology, and Human Values 7(41), 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1982d, Darwinism Defended: A Guide to the Evolution Controversies, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1984, ‘A Philosopher's Day in Court’, in A. Montagu (ed.), Science and Creationism, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 311–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1986, ‘The Academic as Expert Witness’, Science, Technology, and Human Values 11, 68–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1990, Molecules to Men: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.P.: 1959, The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, W.: 1840, The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Parker, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruse, M. Making use of creationism. A case-study for the philosophy of science classroom. Stud Philos Educ 10, 81–92 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367689

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367689

Key Words

Navigation