Conclusion
No one approach is best along all of the four dimensions. The price approach maintains feasibility, where the other two do not necessarily. The quantity approach is coordinable where the other two are not necessarily (and, the price approach only in trivial situations). The mixed approach is very flexible to adapting to existing structures of prices, quantities, and information flows. The other two require specific information flows. And finally, all approaches are improved with rich a priori information. The final selection of an approach must depend upon the relative utilities attached to these four criteria, and that depends upon the particular situation and application.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumol, W.J. and Fabian, T.: “Decomposition, Pricing for Decentralization and External Economies”, Management Science, Vol. 11 No. 1, 1964, p. 1–32.
Beer, K.: Lösung Grosser Linearer Optimierungsuafgaben, VEB, Berlin, DDR, 1977.
Benders, J.G.: “Partitioning Procedures for Solving Mixed Variable Programming Problems”, Numerische Mathematik, Vol. 4, 1962, p. 238–252.
Burton, R.M. and Obel, B.: “The Multilevel Approach to Organizational Issues of the Firm: A Critical Review”, Omega, The International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1977, p. 395–417.
Burton, R.M. and Obel, B.: “Empirical Results on the Relative Efficiency of the Price, Budget, and Mixed Approaches for Decentralized Planning”, management Science, (to appear) 1979.
Christensen, J.A. and Obel, B.: “Simulation of Decentralized Planning in Two Danish Organizations Using Linear Programming Decomposition”, Management Science, Vol. 24, No. 15, 1978, p. 1658–1667.
Dantzig, G. and Wolfe, P.: “Decomposition Principles for Linear Programs”, Operations Research, Vol. 8, 1960, p. 101–111.
Dantzig, G. and Wolfe, P.: “The Decomposition Algorithm for Linear Programming”, Econometrica, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1961, p. 767–778.
Jennergren, L.P.: “Mathematical Programming Models of Decentralized Budgeting Procedures”, Swedish Journal of Economics, Vol. 73, 1971, p. 417–426.
Jennergren, L.P.: “On the Concept of Coordinability in Hierarchical System Theory”, International Journal of Systems Science, Vol. 5, 1974, p. 493–497.
Kydland, F.: “Hierarchical Decomposition in Linear Economic Models”, Management Science, Vol. 21, No. 9, 1975, p. 1029–39.
Kronsjö, Tom: “Centralization and Decentralization of Decision Making”, Revue Francaise Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle, Vol. 2, 1968, p. 73–114.
Kronsjö, Tom: “Decomposition of a Large Nonlinear Convex Separable Economic System in the Dual Direction”, Economics of Planning, Vol. 9, 1969, p. 71–94.
Ljung, B. and Selmer, J.: “An Experimental Test of the Dantzig and Wolfe Decomposition Algorithm as a Planning Tool in a Business Firm”, The Scandinavian Journal of
Ljung, B. and Selmer, J.: “Samordnad Plancring i Decentraliserade Företag”, Bonniers, Stockholm, 1975.
Malinvaud, E.: “Prices for Individual Consumption, Quantity Indicators for Collective Consumption”, Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 39, 1972, p. 385–405.
Obel, B.: “A Note on a Weitzman-like Planning Procedure”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 79, 1977, p. 110–118.
Obel, B.: “A Note on Mixed Procedures for Decomposing Linear Programming Problems”, Mathematische Operationsforschung und Statistik, Series Optimization, Vol. 9, No. 4, 1978, p. 537–544.
Pigot, D., “Double Décomposition d'un Programme,” in Actes de le 3e Conference Internationale de Recherche Opérationelle, Dunod, Paris 1964, p. 72–78.
Portes, R.D.: “Decentralized Planning Procedures and Centrally Planned Economics, American Economic Review, Vol. 61, 1971, p. 422–29.
Sandblom, C-L, “A Computation Investigation Into Nonlinear Decomposition” in D.M.Himmelblau (ed), Decomposition of Large-Scale Problems, North Holland Amsterdam, 1973 p. 415–426.
Seppälä, Yrjo: “A Heuristic Decomposition Procedure for National Economic Planning”, Swedish Journal of Economics, Vol. 76, 1974, p. 199–213.
Ten Kate: “A Decomposition of Linear Programs by Direct Distribution”, Econometrica, Vol. 40, 1972, p. 883–898.
Weitzman, Martin: “Prices vs. Quantities”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 41, October 1974, p. 477–491.
Wong, K.P.: “The Efficiency of Decomposition vs Direct Solution with Implications for the Question of Decentralized or Centralized Planning”, Economics of Planning, Vol. 13, 1973, p. 199–209.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burton, R.M., Obel, B. A comparative analysis of price, quantity, and mixed approaches for decentralized planning. ECONOMICS OF PLANNING 14, 129–140 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367143
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367143