Skip to main content
Log in

Professional rehabilitation of lymphoma patients: a study of psychosocial factors associated with return to work

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the last ten years a substantial reduction in mortality has been obtained for Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Since lymphoma treatment is often accompanied by side effects and long-term sequelae, however, patients often have problems with rehabilitation. It is thus very important that these problems and needs be identified. Going back to work is one of the main objectives of rehabilitation and can be taken as a valuable indicator of the problems and needs of such patients. We therefore conducted a study at the Jules Bordet Institute between December 1989 and December 1990. Of the patients in remission and able to go back to work, only 54% of them have done so. Anxiety, depression, and treatment toxicity interfere with return to work, and the likelihood of job reentry increases with the time lapse since the end of treatment. Rehabilitation programs must focus on alleviating illness and treatment sequelae as soon as treatment ends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Devlen J, Maguire P, Philipps P, et al (1987) Psychological problems associated with diagnosis and treatment of lymphomas. I. Retrospective study. BMJ 295:953–954

    Google Scholar 

  3. Devlen J, Maguire P, Philipps P, et al (1987) Psychological problems associated with diagnosis and treatment of lymphomas. II. Retrospecitve study. BMJ 295:955–957

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hollingshead AB, Redlich FC (1958) Social class and mental illness, Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kleinbaum DC, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H (1982) Epidemiologic research. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppelman LF (1971) EITS manual for the profile of mood states. Educational and Industrial Testing Service. San Diego, Calif

    Google Scholar 

  7. Razavi D, Delvaux N, Brédart A, Paesmans M, Debusscher L, Bron D, Stryckmans P (1992) Screening for psychiatric disorders in a lymphoma out-patient population. Eur J Cancer 28A:1869–1872

    Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization (1979) WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. WHO Offset Publication, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zubrod CG, Schneiderman M, Frei E, et al (1960) Appraisal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustard and triethylene thiophosphoramide. J Chronic Dis 11:7–33

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Razavi, D., Delvaux, N., Brédart, A. et al. Professional rehabilitation of lymphoma patients: a study of psychosocial factors associated with return to work. Support Care Cancer 1, 276–278 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00366050

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00366050

Key words

Navigation