Abstract
Trying to understand the functions of any part of the brain two questions may be asked: “What is it doing?” and “How is it doing it?” Usually these questions are answered simultaneously in terms of a postulated network of interconnected neurons. There is a tendency to formulate all kind of descriptions in brain science only using structural concepts. This reflects the generally adopted idea of the neuron as the functional building-brick of the brain. From a more general point of view, however, it turns out that the two questions sometimes ought to be answered separately, starting with the first one. This conclusion relies upon a study of the basis for neurophysiological theory-making, specially the interaction between observations and hypotheses. Epistemological considerations as well as scrutiny of the available experimental results lead to three basic theses, one on neural support, one on the functional potential of neural systems and one on the definition of neural signals. The general conclusion, stated as a thesis on neural systems, is that with the special kind of experimental results usually available so far, it may often be better to use only hypotheses on the total behaviour of a neural subsystem, disregarding the details of the network producing that behaviour. We call this kind of description on a certain phenomenological level “neurodynamics” to stress that it is a concept different from other kinds of brain theories. Using it we may define the meaning of “information” in a neural system when referring to the content and not the amount. There seems to be a trend towards the neurodynamic approach, but an extensive and consequent use of its principles will have to wait for more powerful experimental techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbib, M.A.: The metaphorical brain. New York: John Wiley 1972
Bar-Hillel, Y.: Language and information pp. 221–274. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley 1964
Braitenberg, V: Personal communication, April 1975
Campbell, F. W., Robson, J. G.: Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 197, 551–566 (1968)
Conrad, M., Güttinger, W., Dal Cin, M. (Eds.): Physics and mathematics of the nervous system. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics. Vol. 4. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1974
Hassenstein, B., Reichardt, W.: Systemtheoretische Analyse der Zeit-, Reihenfolgen- und Vorzeichenauswertung bei der Bewgungsperzeption des Rüsselkäfers Chlorophanus. Z. Naturforsch. 11b, 513–524 (1956)
Hauske, G.: Adaptive filter mechanisms in human vision. Kybernetik 16, 227–237 (1974)
Hempel, G.: Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: Free Press, 1965
Hubel, D. H., Wiesel, T. N.: Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex J. Physiol. (Lond.). 160, 106–154 (1962)
Klir, G., Valach, M.: Cybernetic modelling. London: Iliffe Books 1967
Löfgren, L.: Relative explanations of systems. In: Trends in general systems theory, pp. 340–407. Ed.: Klir, G. New York: John Wiley 1972
Löfgren, L.: On Hempel's paradox of confirmation. In: Proc. 1974 ASL Europ. Meeting Kiel (in press)
Maramarelis, P. Z., Naka, K.-I.: Nonlinear analysis and synthesis of receptive-field responses in the catfish retina. II. J Neurophysiol. 36, 619–633 (1973)
McCulloch, W., Pitts, W.: A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophys. 5, 115–133 (1942)
Poggio, T., Reichardt, W.: Nonlinear interactions underlying visual orientation behaviour of the fly. Proc. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. on Synapses, June 1975
Popper, K.: The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson 1959
Ramón y Cajal, S.: Recollections of any life. Mem. Amer. Phil. Soc. VIII(1), 321–351 (1937)
Rashevsky, N.: Outline of a physico-mathematical theory of excitation and inhibition. Protoplasma 20 42–56 (1933)
Rosenblatt, F.: Principles of neurodynamics. Washington: Spartan Books 1962
Sanderson, A. C., Kozak, W. M., Calvert, T. W.: Distribution coding in the visual pathway, Biophys. J. 13, 218–244 (1973)
Young, J. Z.: A model of the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1964
Young, L. R., Stark, L.: Biological control systems—a critical review and evaluation. NASA Report No. CR-190. Washington: NASA 1965
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Philipson, L. Neurodynamics—An approach to theoretical neurophysiology. Biol. Cybernetics 24, 15–24 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365590
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365590