Summary
During the course of sea urchin development, from early blastula to pluteus larva, there are two major visible processes toward which all activities seem to be focused. They are the differentiation of the larval skeleton by the primary mesenchyme cells and the differentiation of the primitive gut by the secondary mesenchyme cells. These activities take place within the shell-like layer of epithelial cells, or ectodermal wall. The interactive role of the ectodermal wall with the mesenchyme cells is not yet clearly understood. A number of earlier studies have proposed that the ectoderm may have an inductive influence on the mesenchyme cells and that its inner surface forms a molecular template for guiding the mesenchyme cells. In this report, we suggest an additional role for the ectodermal wall. We show that some primary mesenchyme cells and secondary mesenchyme cells insert between the cells of the ectodermal wall in order to firmly anchor the anlage of the larval skeleton and primitive gut during differentiation. This mechanism may provide a physical basis for maintaining the stable positional relationship of the anlage during development.
References
DeSimone DW, Spiegel M (1986) Wheat germ agglutinin binding to the micromeres and primary mesenchyme cells of sea urchin embryos. Dev Biol 114:336–346
Ettensohn CA, McClay DR (1988) Cell lineage conversion in the sea urchin embryo. Dev Biol 125:396–409
Gibson AW, Burke RD (1985) The origin of pigment cells in embryos of the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Dev Biol 107:414–419
Gustafson T (1963) Cellular mechanisms in the morphogenesis of the sea urchin embryo. Cell contacts within the ectoderm and between mesenchyme and ectoderm cells. Exp Cell Res 32: 570–589
Gustafson T, Wolpert L (1961) Studies on the cellular basis of morphogenesis in the sea urchin embryo. Directed movements of primary mesenchyme cells in normal and vegetalized larvae. Exp Cell Res 24:64–79
Gustafson T, Wolpert L (1963) The cellular basis of morphogenesis and sea urchin development. Int Rev Cytol 15:139–214
Gustafson T, Wolpert L (1967) Cellular movement and contact in sea urchin morphogenesis. Biol Rev 42:442–498
Hardin J, McClay DR (1990) Target recognition by the archenteron during sea urchin gastrulation. Dev Biol 142:86–102
Harkey M, Whiteley AH (1980) Isolation, culture and differentiation of echinoid primary mesenchyme cells. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 189:111–122
Katow H, Solursh M (1982) In situ distribution of Con A binding sites in mesenchyme blastulae and gastrulae of the sea urchin Lytechinus pictus. Exp Cell Res 139:171–180
Okazaki K (1960) Skeleton formation of sea urchin larvae. II. Organic matrix of the spicule. Embryologia 5:283–320
Okazaki K (1975) Normal development to metamorphosis. In: Czihak G (ed) The sea urchin embryo. Biochemistry and Morphogenesis. Springer, New York, pp 177–232
Solursh M (1986) Migration of sea urchin primary mesenchyme cells. In: Browder LW (ed) Development biology, vol. 2. The cellular basis of morphogenesis. Plenum Press, New York, pp 391–431
Solursh M, Katow H (1982) Initial characterization of sulfated macromolecules in the blastocoels of mesenchyme blastulae of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus and Lytechinus pictus. Dev Biol 94:326–336
Spiegel M, Burger MM (1982) Cell adhesion during gastrulation. A new approach. Exp Cell Res 139:377–382
Spiegel E, Howard L (1983) Development of cell junctions in sea urchin embryos. J Cell Sci 62:27–48
Spiegel E, Burger MM, Spiegel M (1983) Fibronectin and laminin in the extracellular matrix and basement membrane of sea urchin embryos. Exp Cell Res 144:47–55
Spiegel E, Howard L, Spiegel M (1989) Extracellular matrix of sea urchin and other marine invertebrate embryos. J Morphol 199:71–92
Weiss P (1947) The problem of specificity in growth and development. Yale J Biol Med 19:233–278
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spiegel, E., Spiegel, M. The insertion of mesenchyme cells into the ectoderm during differentiation in Sea urchin embryos. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 201, 383–388 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365126
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365126