Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of otu mutations on male fertility and spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Roux's archives of developmental biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 17-ethyl-methyl-sulphonate (EMS) induced female sterile alleles of the ovarian tumour (otu) locus show a wide spectrum of phenotypes and affect various processes of Drosophila oogenesis. These phenotypes have been previously studied in detail, but the exact molecular function of the otu locus in the different processes of oogenesis is only poorly known. To date, no effect of otu mutations have been reported in the males. However, separate species of otu mRNAs are expressed in the testes and the thorax of the adult male, but their role is not known. In this study we analysed the effects of EMS-induced otu mutations on male fertility. We observed that the proportion of totally sterile males is significantly higher in most of the tested otu strains as compared to the wild type. There was a strong correlation between male sterility and severity of impairment in the female phenotype. Spermatogenesis of these semi-sterile strains was analysed by phase contrast microscopy, Hoechst 33258 and Feulgen stain, and by in situ hybridisation with testis-specific probes. No changes which could account for the induction of sterility were recorded and normal amounts of motile sperm were observed in all strains. Sterility turned out to be a consequence of a failure in mating behaviour. The wild type females refused to react to the courtship attempts of the mutant males. We propose two alternative explanations for this. Either the otu locus may play some important role in male somatic tissue, or some germ line function is necessary for correct mating behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Casal J, Gonzalez C, Wandosell F, Avila J, Ripoll P (1990) Abnormal meiotic spindles cause a cascade of defects during spermatogenesis in asp males of Drosophila. Development 108:251–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambe MA, Laird CD (1989) Nucleotide sequence of a cDNA from the putative ovarian tumor locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res 17:3304

    Google Scholar 

  • DiBenedetto AJ, Lakich DM, Kruger WD, Belote JM, Baker BS, Wolfner MF (1987) Sequences expressed sex-specifically in Drosophila melanogaster adults. Dev Biol 119:242–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans M, Audit C, Masson M (1975) Isolation and characterization of sex linked female-sterile mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 81:683–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy RW, Lindsley DL, Livak KJ, Lewis B, Siversten AL, Joslyn GL, Edwards J, Bonaccorsi S (1984) Cytogenetic analysis of a segment of the Y chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 107:591–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemphues KJ, Kaufman TC, Raff RA, Raff EC (1982) The testis specific β-tubulin subunit in Drosophila melanogaster has multiple functions in spermatogenesis. Cell 31:655–670

    Google Scholar 

  • King RC, Bahns M, Horowitz R, Larramendi P (1978) A mutation that affects female and male germ cells differentially in Drosophila melanogaster Meigen (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 7:359–378

    Google Scholar 

  • King RC, Mohler D, Riley SF, Storto PD, Nicolazzo PS (1986) Complementation between alleles at the ovarian tumor locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Genet 7:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifschytz E (1987) The developmental program of spermiogenesis in Drosophila: a genetic analysis. In: Bourne GH, Joan KW, Friedlander M (eds) International review of cytology, vol 109. Academic Press, London, pp 211–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Livak KJ (1984) Organisation and mapping of a sequence on the Drosophila melanogaster X and Y chromosomes that is transcribed during spermatogenesis. Genetics 107:611–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Michiels F, Gasch A, Kaltschmid B, Renkawitz-Pohl R (1989) A 14 by promoter element directs the testis specificity of the Drosophila β2 tubulin gene. EMBO J 8:1559–1565

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohler JD (1977) Developmental genetics of the Drosophila egg. I. Identification of 59 sex-linked cistrons with maternal effects on embryonic development. Genetics 85:259–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan PK, Mohler JD, Kalfayan LJ (1988) Molecular localization and developmental expression of the otu locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol 8:1481–1488

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb JA (1969) Maintenance of imaginal discs of Drosophila melanogaster in chemically defined media. J Cell Biol 41:876–885

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass GL, Mohler JD, Walsh RC, Kalfayan LJ, Searles LL (1993) Structure and expression of hybrid-dysgenesis induced alleles of the ovarian tumor (otu) gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 133:253–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhauer WR, Kalfayan LJ (1992) A specific ovarian tumor protein isoform is required for efficient differentiation of germ cells in Drosophila oogenesis. Genes Dev 6:233–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhauer WR, Walsh RC, Kalfayan LJ (1989) Sequence and structure of the Drosophila melanogaster ovarian tumor gene and generation of an antibody specific for the ovarian tumor protein. Mol Cell Biol 9:5726–5732

    Google Scholar 

  • Storto PD, King RC (1987) Fertile heteroallelic combinations of mutant alleles of the otu locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 196:210–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Storto PD, King RC (1988) Multiplicity of functions for the otu gene products during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev Genet 9:91–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter B, Steward R (1991) Requirement for phosphorylation and localization of the Bicaudal-D protein in Drosophila oocyte. Cell 67:917–926

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautz D, Pfeifle C (1989) A non-radioactive in situ hybridisation method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma 98:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirronen M, Partanen M, Heino TO, Heino TI, Roos Ch (1992) Analyses of the Drosophila quit, ovarian tumor and shut down mutants in oocyte differentiation using in situ hybridisation. Mech Dev 40:113–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Welbergen PH, van Dijken FR, Scharloo W (1987) Collation of the courtship behaviour of the sympatric species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Behaviour 101:253–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieschaus E, Audit C, Masson M (1981) A clonal analysis of the roles of somatic cells and germ line during oogenesis in Drosophila. Dev Biol 88:92–103

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tirronen, M., Heino, T.I. & Roos, C. Effect of otu mutations on male fertility and spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster . Roux's Arch Dev Biol 202, 306–311 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00363219

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00363219

Key words

Navigation