Abstract
In the past, ultrastructural studies on chromosome morphology have been carried out using light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy of whole mounted or sectioned samples. Until now, however, it has not been possible to use all of these techniques on the same specimen. In this paper we describe a specimen preparation method that allows one to study the same chromosomes by transmission, scanning-transmission and scanning electron microscopy, as well as by standard light microscopy and confocal microscopy. Chromosome plates are obtained on a carbon coated glass slide. The carbon film carrying the chromosomes is then transferred to electron microscopy grids, subjected to various treatments and observed. The results show a consistent morphological correspondence between the different methods. This method could be very useful and important because it makes possible a direct comparison between the various techniques used in chromosome studies such as banding, in situ hybridization, fluorescent probe localization, ultrastructural analysis, and colloidal gold cytochemical reactions
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CLSM:
-
confocal laser scanning microscope
- EM:
-
electron microscopy
- kV:
-
kilovolt(s)
- LM:
-
light microscope
- SEM:
-
scanning electron microscope
- STEM:
-
scanning-transmission electron microscope
- TEM:
-
transmission electron microscope
References
Allen TD, Jack EM, Harrison CJ, Claugher D (1986) Scanning electron microscopy of human metaphase chromosomes. Scanning Electron Microsc 1:301–308
Allen TD, Jack EM, Harrison CJ (1988) The three-dimensional structure of human metaphase chromosomes determined by scanning electron microscopy. In: Adolph KW (ed) Chromosome and chromatin, vol 2. CRC Press, Fla, USA, pp 51–72
Burkholder GD (1974) Electron microscopic visualization of chromosomes banded with trypsin. Nature 247:292–294
Du Praw EJ, Bahr GF (1969) The arrangement of DNA in human chromosomes, as investigated by quantitative electron microscopy. Acta Cytol 13:188–205
Gosalvez J, Sumner AT, Lopez-Fernandez C, Rossino R, Goyanes V, Mezzanotte R (1990) Electron microscopy and biochemical analysis of mouse metaphase chromosomes after digestion with restriction endonucleases. Chromosoma 99:36–43
Harrison CJ, Allen TD, Harris R (1983) Scanning electron microscopy of variations in human metaphase chromosome structure revealed by Giemsa banding. Cytogenet Cell Genet 35:21–27
Harrison CJ, Jack EM, Allen TD, Harris R (1985) Light and scanning electron microscopy of the same human metaphase chromosomes. J Cell Sci 77:143–153
Manuelidis L, Chen TL (1990) A unified model of eukaryotic chromosomes, Cytometry 11:8–25
Misell DL (1978) Instrumental methods of contrast enhancement. In: Glauert AM (ed) Practical methods in electron microscopy, vol 7. North Holland Publ. Corp. Amsterdam New York London, pp 199–244
Sanchez-Sweatman OH, De Harven EP, Dubé ID (1993) Human chromosomes: evaluation of processing techniques for scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Microsc 7:97–106
Sumner AT (1990) Banding with nucleases. In: Sumner AT (ed) Chromosome banding. Unwin Hyman, London, pp 253–259
Sumner AT (1991) Scanning electron microscopy of mammalian chromosomes from prophase to telophase. Chromosoma 100:410–418
Williams DB (1984) Practical analytical electron microscopy in materials science. Philips Electron Instruments. Electron Optics Publ. Group. Mahwah, NJ, USA, pp 153
Woods PS Ledbetter MC, Tempel N (1991) Preservation of EDTA-expanded grid-mounted chromosomes and nuclei for electron microscopy using a specially designed freeze-dryer. J Electron Microse Technique 18:183–191
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Squarzoni, S., Cinti, C., Santi, S. et al. Preparation of chromosome spreads for electron (TEM, SEM, STEM), light and confocal microscopy. Chromosoma 103, 381–392 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00362282
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00362282