Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparative study of the Chinese and the Swedish principles of employment systems

  • Published:
Economics of Planning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A cross-cultural or comparative approach is applied in order to demonstrate the main characteristics both of the theoretic background and practice of the Chinese and the Swedish principles of employment systems. This paper attempts to point out some main/problems of the Chinese system and to make some challenges for suggested reform. After examining basic conflicts and relationships between public policy and the working of free market forces in the two countries, the paper suggests how the Chinese traditional socialist principles ought to be revised if a ‘socialist market economy’ is to be developed. The key to reforming the employment system lies in changing the form of ownership and management of enterprises by allowing fair competition and bankruptcy of enterprises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alder-KarlssonGunnar (1967), ‘Functional Socialism — A Swedish Theory for Democratic Socialization’, Stockholm: Prisma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoroso, Bruno (1989), ‘Is the Scandinavian model an alternative to “Communism” in Eastern Europe?,’ in B. Amoroso and J. Jespersen (eds). Macroeconomic Theories & Policies for the 1990s', Macmillan.

  • Beijing Review (1986–1991).

  • Berg, Axel ven den and Toseph Smucker (1992), ‘Labour markets and government influences: a comparison of Canadian and Swedish labour market policies’, International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 29 (1).

  • BosworthBarry P. and RivlinAllice M. (eds) (1987), ‘The Swedish Economy’, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Youth, (1989–1990), Beijing.

  • EdlundSten and NyströmBirgitta (1988), ‘Development in Swedish Labour Law’, Stockholm: The Swedish Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • FuråkerBengt (1990), ‘Labour Markets and Labour Market Flexibility in Canada and Sweden’, Umeå: Umeå University, Umeå Studies in Sociology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, Bent (1993), ‘Labour Market Policy — an introduction to different theories and presentation of main elements of the labour market policy in Denmark’, working paper, Roskilde University.

  • HolmlundBertil (1984), ‘Labour Mobility: Studies of Labour Turnover and Migration in the Swedish Labour Market’ Stockholm: Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research, pp. 139–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Daiguan and Li, Yilin (1982), ‘The Main Schools of Bourgeois Economics of Our Time’, Commercial Publishing House, pp 220–222.

  • JangenäsBo (1985), ‘The Swedish Approach to Labour Market Policy’, Stockholm: The Swedish Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Zemin (1989), ‘Speech at the meeting in celebrating the 40th Anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China’, Beijing Review, No. 41.

  • JohannessonJan (1991), ‘On the Outcome of Swedish Labour Market Policy’, Stockholm: EFA, Swedish Ministry of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • LinFuan and ShunZhen (eds) (1992) ‘The Volume of Structural Reform of Labour and Wage’, Dalian: Dalian People's Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, Assar and Snower, Dennis, J. (1988), ‘The Insider-Outsider Theory of Unemployment and Unemployment’, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 1–14; pp. 173–206.

  • MarxKarl, (1867), ‘Capital — A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production’. Berlin Dietz-Verlag 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • News & Views, 1991–1993, Stockholm.

  • OECD (1992), ‘Employment Outlook’, Paris.

  • RehnG. (1984), ‘The wages of success’, in Daedalus, Cambridge, Massachusetts: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Vol. 113, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShenQuanshui (1993), ‘Sweden: the state's regulation of and influence on the labour market’, Economic Research Journal, No. 11, Beijing: Economic Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • StandingGuy (1988), ‘Unemployment and Labour Market Flexibility: Sweden’, Geneve: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Swedish Institute (1991), ‘Swedish Labour Market Policy’, Stockholm: Fact Sheets on Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish National Labour Market Board (1992), ‘Annual Report for 1991/92’.

  • Swedish Ministry of Labour (1993), ‘The Labour Market and Labour Market Policy in Sweden’, Stockholm.

  • TianYi (1993), ‘Studying Abroad’, Beijing: Publishing House of People's Daily.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalberg, Björn and Ström, Steinar (eds.) (1979), ‘The Theoretical Contributions of Knut Wicksell’, Macmillan.

  • TrehörningPär (1993), ‘Measures to Combat Unemployment in Sweden’, Stockholm: The Swedish Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • WicksellKnut (1934), ‘Lectures on Political Economy’, Vol. I, General Theory, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shen, Q. A comparative study of the Chinese and the Swedish principles of employment systems. Economics of Planning 29, 75–102 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00361416

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00361416

Key words

Navigation