Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Uncertainty over future environmental taxes

Impact on current investment in resource conservation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Besides static efficiency properties, environmental policies should be evaluated in terms of their longer-run impacts on investment and technological change to reduce pollution and degradation of natural resources. Using a stochastic dynamic programming approach, this paper analyzes how uncertainty about a future environmental tax on a polluting input alters investment in resource conservation and how such investment affects future demand for the polluting input. The impact on investment depends crucially on price elasticities of demand and on the manner in which investment shifts and rotates the demand schedule for the polluting input in the future. The expectation of a higher tax does not necessarily create stronger incentives for investment in resource conservation. More uncertainty about future policies does encourage investment if it makes a firm more responsive to future price changes and discourages investment if it makes a firm less responsive to price changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Binswanger, H. P. (1974), ‘A Microeconomic Approach to Induced Innovation’, Economic Journal, December 84, 940–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, P. and C. S. Russell (1985), ‘Comparative Analysis of Alternative Polcy Instruments’, in A. V. Kneese and J. L. Sweeney, eds., Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. I, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

  • Caswell, M. F. and D. Zilberman (1986), ‘The Effects of Well Depth and Land Quality on the Choice of Irrigation Technology’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68, 798–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavas, J-P., R. Bishop, and K. Segerson (1986), ‘Ex Ante Consumer Welfare Evaluation in Cost-Benefit Analysis’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13, 255–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, R. F. (1992), ‘Natural Resources and the Marshallian Effects of Input-Reducing Technological Changes’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 23 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, P. B. and L. J. White (1986), ‘Innovation in Pollution Control’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 13 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. (1978), “Protection Flexibility and the Behaviour of the Competitive Firm under Price Uncertainty’, Review of Economic Studies, June 45, 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, R. (1976), ‘Factor Demand with Output Price Uncertainty’, American Economic Review, September 66, 675–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M. and N. Schwartz (1968), ‘Optimal Induced Technical Change’, Econometrica, January 36, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneese, A. V. and C. L. Schultze (1975), Pollution, Prices, and Public Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kon, Y. (1983), ‘Captial Input Choice Under Price Uncertainty: A Putty-Clay Technology Case’, International Economic Review 24, 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magat, W. A. (1978), ‘Pollution Control and Technological Advance: A Dynamic Model of the Firm’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 5, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, A. (1991), ‘Firm Incentives to Promote Technological Change in Pollution Control: Comment’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21, 297–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, A. (1978), ‘The Choice of Efficient Pollution Policies: Technology and Economics in the Control of Sulphur Dioxide’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 5, 44–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCain, R. A. (1978), ‘Endogenous Bias in Technical Progress and Environmental Policy’, American Economic Review 68, 538–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, R. (1985), ‘The Potential for Private Cost-Increasing Technological Innovation under a Tax-Based Economic Incentive Pollution Control Policy’, Land Economics 61, 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, R. (1986), ‘Regulating Homogeneous Emissions’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13, 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. (1987), ‘Two-Moment Decision Models and Expected Utility Maximization’, American Economic Review 77, 421–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliman, S. R. and R. Prince (1989), ‘Firm Incentives to Promote Technological Change in Pollution Control’, Journal of Environmental Ecnomics and Management 17, 247–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, L. (1976), ‘Incentive for Innovation as the Basis for Effluent Charge Strategy’, American Economic Review, 66, 441–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (1991), ‘Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Investment’, Journal of Economic Literature 29, 1110–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rader, T. (1968), ‘Normally, Inputs are Never Gross Substitutes’, Journal of Political Economy, February 78, 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnovsky, S. (1973), ‘Production Flexibility, Price Uncertainty and the Behavior of the Competitive Firm’, International Economic Review, June 14, 395–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenders, J. T. (1975), ‘Methods of Pollution Control and the Rate of Change in Pollution Abatement Technology’, Water Resources Research 11, 393–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D. (1984), ‘The Effects of Price Uncertainty on the Factor Choices of the Competitive Firm’, Southern Economic Journal 51, 443–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, R. O. (1970), ‘Theoretical Efficiency in Pollution Control’, Western Economic Journal 8, 364–376.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harvard Institute for International Development, 1 Eliot Street, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Bruce A. Larson

  2. Economic Research Service, USA

    George B. Frisvold

Authors
  1. Bruce A. Larson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. George B. Frisvold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larson, B.A., Frisvold, G.B. Uncertainty over future environmental taxes. Environmental and Resource Economics 8, 461–471 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357414

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357414

Key words

Search

Navigation