Abstract
Minute elements detected in Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae, Diptera) lack chromosome arms but carry centromeres and possess kinetochore microtubules in mitosis as well as in meiosis. These centromere-like elements (CLEs) were present in two geographically independent strains of the fly. This indicates that their origin is not a recent event in the karyotype evolution of M. scalaris and that they are rather stable constituents of the karyotype. Most often, two CLEs were found in gonial and somatic mitosis. Spermatocytes contained one CLE. Two individuals examined deviated from this rule in that a metaphase spermatogonium showed three and an anaphase spermatogonium eight CLEs. These animals are believed to have been aneuploid relative to the CLEs. An analysis of spermatogonial division revealed that the CLEs behave like the centromeres of the regular chromosomes but seem to separate precociously, since they were closer to the spindle poles in late anaphase cells. Whereas the size of the CLEs was not significantly different between mitotic cells and secondary spermatocytes, the CLEs in primary spermatocytes were larger in volume by a factor of about 4.5 than those in mitosis and meiosis II. The additional material is interpreted as a glue that holds two CLEs together. This, in turn, is a prerequisite for orderly segregation. The function of the CLEs is not known. They are considered as B chromosomes reduced to the minimum required for segregation, the centromere.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
AndersenLB, TommerupN, KochJ (1990) Formation of a minichromosome by excision of the proximal region of 17q in a patient with von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis. Cytogenet Cell Genet 53: 206–210
AultJG, LinH-PP, ChurchK (1982) Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. The conjunctive mechanism of the XY bivalent. Chromosoma 86: 309–317
BeckerHJ (1976) Mitotic recombination. In: AshburnerM, NovitskiE (eds) The genetics and biology of Drosophila, vol 1c. Academic Press, London, pp 1020–1087
BennerDB, OstermeyerF (1980) Some observations on the life history of the fly Megaselia scalaris Loew (Phoridae) with special reference to the eclosion pattern. J Tenn Acad Sci 55: 103–105
BlockK, IsingG, StåhlF (1990) Minichromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster derived from the transposing element TE 1. Chromosoma 99: 336–343
BrennerS, PepperD, BernsM, TanE, BrinkleyBR (1981) Kinetochore structure, duplication and distribution in mammalian cells: an analysis by human auto-antibodies from scleroderma patients. J Cell Biol 91: 95–102
CarineK, Jacquemin-SablonA, WaltzerE, MascarelloJ, SchefflerIE (1989) Molecular characterization of human minichromosomes with centromere from chromosome 1 in human-hamster hybrid cells. Somatic Cell Mol Genet 15: 445–460
CrockerM, CattanachBM (1981) X-ray induction of translocations in mice carrying metacentrics (Robertsonian fusions): Detection of whole arm chromosome exchanges. Mutat Res 91: 353–357
DarlingtonCD (1931) Meiosis. Biol Rev 6: 221–264
HaafT, SchmidM (1988) Analysis of double minutes and double minute-like chromatin in human and murine tumor cells using antikinetochore antibodies. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 30: 73–82
JakobssonA-H, ArnasonU, LevanA, MartinssonT HansonC, LevanL (1987) Novel cytogenetic expression of gene amplification in actinomycin D-resistant somatic cell hybrids: transfer of resistance by centric chromatin bodies. Chromosoma 95: 408–418
JensenCJ (1982) Dynamics of spindle microtubule organization: Kinetochore fiber microtubules of plant endosperm. J Cell Biol 92: 540–558
JohnB, FreemanM (1975) Causes and consequences of Robertsonian exchange. Chromosoma 52: 123–136
JohnB (1990) Meiosis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
JohnsonDS, mertlHG, TrautW (1988) Inheritance of cytogenetic and new genetic markers in Megaselia scalaris, a fly with an unusual sex determining mechanism. Genetica 77: 159–170
JokelainenPT (1967) The ultrastructure and spatial organization of the metaphase kinetochore in mitotic rat cells. J Ultrastruct Res 19: 19–44
JonesRN, ReesH (1982) B chromosomes. Academic Press, London
LinH-PP, AultJG, ChurchK (1981) Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Chromosome identification and kinetochore microtubule numbers during the first and the second meiotic divisions in males. Chromosoma 83:507–521
MaixF (1964) The genetics of Megaselia scalaris Loew (Phoridae): A new type of sex determination in Diptera. Am Nat 98: 415–430
MassartDL, DerdeMP, MichotteL, KaufmanL (1984) Balance. A program to compare two series of measurements. Elsevier, Amsterdam
MaziaD (1984) Centrosomes and mitotic poles. Exp Cell Res 153: 1–15
McintoshJR, CandeWZ, SnyderJA (1975) Structure and physiology of the mammalian mitotic spindle. In: InouéS, StephensRE (eds) Molecules and cell movement. Raven Press, New York, pp 31–76
PaweletzN (1967) Zur Funktion des “Flemming-Körpers” bei der Teilung tierischer Zellen. Naturwissenschaften 54: 533–535
RasmussenSW (1977) The transformation of the synaptonemal complex into the “elimination chromatin” in Bombyx mori oocytes. Chromosoma 60: 205–221
RattnerJB, LinCC (1984) Ultrastructural organization of double minute chromosomes and HSR regions in human colon carcinoma cells. Cytogenet Cell Genet 38: 176–181
RattnerJB, LinCC (1987) The higher order structure of the centromere. Genome 29: 588–593
RoosU-P (1981) Quantitative structure analysis of the mitotic spindle. In: SchweigerHG (ed) International cell biology 1980–1981. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 369–381
SchiblerMJ, Pickett-HeapsJD (1987) The kinetochore fiber structure in the acentric spindles of the green alga Oedogonium. Protoplasma 137: 29–44
SchmidM, HaafT, SchindlerD, MeurerM (1989) Centromeric association of a microchromosome. A new category of nonrandom arrangement of metaphase chromosomes. Hum Genet 81: 127–136
TrautW, KhuongNT, SchneiderS (1990) Karyotypes of Megaselia scalaris (Diptera) wild-type and translocation strains. Genetica 83: 77–84
TrautW, WillhoeftU (1990) A jumping sex determining factor in the fly Megaselia scalaris. Chromosoma 99: 407–412
Vianna-MorganteAM, RosenbergC (1986) Deletion of the centromere as a mechanism for achieving stability of a dicentric chromosome. Cytogenet Cell Genet 42: 119–122
VigBK, ZinkowskiRP (1985) Sequence of centromere separation: Influence of pericentromeric heterochromatin (repetitive DNA) in Mus. Genetica 67: 153–159
WillhoeftU, TrautW (1990) Molecular differentiation of the homomorphic sex chromosomes in Megaselia scalaris (Diptera) detected by random DNA probes. Chromosoma 99: 237–242
WolfKW (1990a) The behavior of C-shaped microtubule endings in the cell. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 17: 59–67
WolfKW (1990b) Mitotic and meiotic spindles from two insect orders, Lepidoptera and Diptera, differ in terms of microtubule and membrane content. J Cell Sci 97: 91–100
WolfKW, WinkingH, FredgaK (1987) Relationship between nucleoli and sex chromosomes during meiosis of the male wood lemming Myopus schisticolor: a fine structure study Biol Cell 60: 15–24
WolfKW, JohnsonDS, TrautW (1988) Centromere-like elements devoid of chromosome arms in Megaselia scalaris (Diptera). In: BrandhamPE (ed) Kew chromosome conference III. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, pp 1–7
Wolf KW, Kyburg J, Blackman RL (1991) The relationship between nuclear envelope-derived annulate lamellae and the asymmetric division of primary spermatocytes in aphids. Chromosoma 101 (in press)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
by J.B. Rattner
Address from April 1st 1991 until March 31st 1992: MRC, Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolf, K.W., Mertl, H.G. & Traut, W. Structure, mitotic and meiotic behaviour, and stability of centromere-like elements devoid of chromosome arms in the fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae). Chromosoma 101, 99–108 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357059
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357059