Skip to main content
Log in

Structure, mitotic and meiotic behaviour, and stability of centromere-like elements devoid of chromosome arms in the fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae)

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope

Abstract

Minute elements detected in Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae, Diptera) lack chromosome arms but carry centromeres and possess kinetochore microtubules in mitosis as well as in meiosis. These centromere-like elements (CLEs) were present in two geographically independent strains of the fly. This indicates that their origin is not a recent event in the karyotype evolution of M. scalaris and that they are rather stable constituents of the karyotype. Most often, two CLEs were found in gonial and somatic mitosis. Spermatocytes contained one CLE. Two individuals examined deviated from this rule in that a metaphase spermatogonium showed three and an anaphase spermatogonium eight CLEs. These animals are believed to have been aneuploid relative to the CLEs. An analysis of spermatogonial division revealed that the CLEs behave like the centromeres of the regular chromosomes but seem to separate precociously, since they were closer to the spindle poles in late anaphase cells. Whereas the size of the CLEs was not significantly different between mitotic cells and secondary spermatocytes, the CLEs in primary spermatocytes were larger in volume by a factor of about 4.5 than those in mitosis and meiosis II. The additional material is interpreted as a glue that holds two CLEs together. This, in turn, is a prerequisite for orderly segregation. The function of the CLEs is not known. They are considered as B chromosomes reduced to the minimum required for segregation, the centromere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • AndersenLB, TommerupN, KochJ (1990) Formation of a minichromosome by excision of the proximal region of 17q in a patient with von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis. Cytogenet Cell Genet 53: 206–210

    Google Scholar 

  • AultJG, LinH-PP, ChurchK (1982) Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. The conjunctive mechanism of the XY bivalent. Chromosoma 86: 309–317

    Google Scholar 

  • BeckerHJ (1976) Mitotic recombination. In: AshburnerM, NovitskiE (eds) The genetics and biology of Drosophila, vol 1c. Academic Press, London, pp 1020–1087

    Google Scholar 

  • BennerDB, OstermeyerF (1980) Some observations on the life history of the fly Megaselia scalaris Loew (Phoridae) with special reference to the eclosion pattern. J Tenn Acad Sci 55: 103–105

    Google Scholar 

  • BlockK, IsingG, StåhlF (1990) Minichromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster derived from the transposing element TE 1. Chromosoma 99: 336–343

    Google Scholar 

  • BrennerS, PepperD, BernsM, TanE, BrinkleyBR (1981) Kinetochore structure, duplication and distribution in mammalian cells: an analysis by human auto-antibodies from scleroderma patients. J Cell Biol 91: 95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • CarineK, Jacquemin-SablonA, WaltzerE, MascarelloJ, SchefflerIE (1989) Molecular characterization of human minichromosomes with centromere from chromosome 1 in human-hamster hybrid cells. Somatic Cell Mol Genet 15: 445–460

    Google Scholar 

  • CrockerM, CattanachBM (1981) X-ray induction of translocations in mice carrying metacentrics (Robertsonian fusions): Detection of whole arm chromosome exchanges. Mutat Res 91: 353–357

    Google Scholar 

  • DarlingtonCD (1931) Meiosis. Biol Rev 6: 221–264

    Google Scholar 

  • HaafT, SchmidM (1988) Analysis of double minutes and double minute-like chromatin in human and murine tumor cells using antikinetochore antibodies. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 30: 73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • JakobssonA-H, ArnasonU, LevanA, MartinssonT HansonC, LevanL (1987) Novel cytogenetic expression of gene amplification in actinomycin D-resistant somatic cell hybrids: transfer of resistance by centric chromatin bodies. Chromosoma 95: 408–418

    Google Scholar 

  • JensenCJ (1982) Dynamics of spindle microtubule organization: Kinetochore fiber microtubules of plant endosperm. J Cell Biol 92: 540–558

    Google Scholar 

  • JohnB, FreemanM (1975) Causes and consequences of Robertsonian exchange. Chromosoma 52: 123–136

    Google Scholar 

  • JohnB (1990) Meiosis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • JohnsonDS, mertlHG, TrautW (1988) Inheritance of cytogenetic and new genetic markers in Megaselia scalaris, a fly with an unusual sex determining mechanism. Genetica 77: 159–170

    Google Scholar 

  • JokelainenPT (1967) The ultrastructure and spatial organization of the metaphase kinetochore in mitotic rat cells. J Ultrastruct Res 19: 19–44

    Google Scholar 

  • JonesRN, ReesH (1982) B chromosomes. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • LinH-PP, AultJG, ChurchK (1981) Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Chromosome identification and kinetochore microtubule numbers during the first and the second meiotic divisions in males. Chromosoma 83:507–521

    Google Scholar 

  • MaixF (1964) The genetics of Megaselia scalaris Loew (Phoridae): A new type of sex determination in Diptera. Am Nat 98: 415–430

    Google Scholar 

  • MassartDL, DerdeMP, MichotteL, KaufmanL (1984) Balance. A program to compare two series of measurements. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • MaziaD (1984) Centrosomes and mitotic poles. Exp Cell Res 153: 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • McintoshJR, CandeWZ, SnyderJA (1975) Structure and physiology of the mammalian mitotic spindle. In: InouéS, StephensRE (eds) Molecules and cell movement. Raven Press, New York, pp 31–76

    Google Scholar 

  • PaweletzN (1967) Zur Funktion des “Flemming-Körpers” bei der Teilung tierischer Zellen. Naturwissenschaften 54: 533–535

    Google Scholar 

  • RasmussenSW (1977) The transformation of the synaptonemal complex into the “elimination chromatin” in Bombyx mori oocytes. Chromosoma 60: 205–221

    Google Scholar 

  • RattnerJB, LinCC (1984) Ultrastructural organization of double minute chromosomes and HSR regions in human colon carcinoma cells. Cytogenet Cell Genet 38: 176–181

    Google Scholar 

  • RattnerJB, LinCC (1987) The higher order structure of the centromere. Genome 29: 588–593

    Google Scholar 

  • RoosU-P (1981) Quantitative structure analysis of the mitotic spindle. In: SchweigerHG (ed) International cell biology 1980–1981. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 369–381

    Google Scholar 

  • SchiblerMJ, Pickett-HeapsJD (1987) The kinetochore fiber structure in the acentric spindles of the green alga Oedogonium. Protoplasma 137: 29–44

    Google Scholar 

  • SchmidM, HaafT, SchindlerD, MeurerM (1989) Centromeric association of a microchromosome. A new category of nonrandom arrangement of metaphase chromosomes. Hum Genet 81: 127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • TrautW, KhuongNT, SchneiderS (1990) Karyotypes of Megaselia scalaris (Diptera) wild-type and translocation strains. Genetica 83: 77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • TrautW, WillhoeftU (1990) A jumping sex determining factor in the fly Megaselia scalaris. Chromosoma 99: 407–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Vianna-MorganteAM, RosenbergC (1986) Deletion of the centromere as a mechanism for achieving stability of a dicentric chromosome. Cytogenet Cell Genet 42: 119–122

    Google Scholar 

  • VigBK, ZinkowskiRP (1985) Sequence of centromere separation: Influence of pericentromeric heterochromatin (repetitive DNA) in Mus. Genetica 67: 153–159

    Google Scholar 

  • WillhoeftU, TrautW (1990) Molecular differentiation of the homomorphic sex chromosomes in Megaselia scalaris (Diptera) detected by random DNA probes. Chromosoma 99: 237–242

    Google Scholar 

  • WolfKW (1990a) The behavior of C-shaped microtubule endings in the cell. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 17: 59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • WolfKW (1990b) Mitotic and meiotic spindles from two insect orders, Lepidoptera and Diptera, differ in terms of microtubule and membrane content. J Cell Sci 97: 91–100

    Google Scholar 

  • WolfKW, WinkingH, FredgaK (1987) Relationship between nucleoli and sex chromosomes during meiosis of the male wood lemming Myopus schisticolor: a fine structure study Biol Cell 60: 15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • WolfKW, JohnsonDS, TrautW (1988) Centromere-like elements devoid of chromosome arms in Megaselia scalaris (Diptera). In: BrandhamPE (ed) Kew chromosome conference III. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf KW, Kyburg J, Blackman RL (1991) The relationship between nuclear envelope-derived annulate lamellae and the asymmetric division of primary spermatocytes in aphids. Chromosoma 101 (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

by J.B. Rattner

Address from April 1st 1991 until March 31st 1992: MRC, Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolf, K.W., Mertl, H.G. & Traut, W. Structure, mitotic and meiotic behaviour, and stability of centromere-like elements devoid of chromosome arms in the fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae). Chromosoma 101, 99–108 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357059

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357059

Keywords