Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 30, Issue 22, pp 5672–5680 | Cite as

Effects of temperature and load on the melt index of LDPE/LLDPE blends of different blend ratios

  • A. C. -Y. Wong
  • A. D. E. Sy


The temperature, load and blend ratio effects on the melt index of low density polyethylene (LDPE) /linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) blends were studied. The experimental results suggested that the correlation between overall melt index and blend ratio of LDPE/LLDPE blends was governed by a log-linear relationship. This relationship, in turn, offered a simple method for the estimation of the melt index of LDPE/LLDPE blends with minimum experimental work. The results of the temperature effect indicated that if blending was for improving processability, the sensitivity of the melt index of LDPE should then be less than that of LLDPE; whereas, the reverse sensitivity of melt index to temperature was for improving properties of end products. It was shown that melt index increased with increasing applied load. The compressibility characteristics of the polymer melt was thought to account for the susceptibility of melt index to the applied load. Two distinct melting peaks were obtained from the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms. This suggested that compatibility was not responsible for the effects shown by the factors studied in this work.


Polymer Polyethylene Differential Scanning Calorimetry Calorimetry Experimental Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L. A. Utracki and Z. H. Shi, Polym. Eng. Sci. 32 (1992) 1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Z. H. Shi and L. A. Utracki, Ibid. 32 (1992) 1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. Bordereau, Z. H. Shi, L. A. Utracki, P. Sammut and M. Carrega, Ibid 32 (1992) 1846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Abtal and R. E. Prud'homme, Ibid. 32 (1992) 1857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    U. Sundararaj and C. W. Macosko, Ibid. 32 (1992) 1814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. E. Wetton and P. J. Corish, Polym. Testing, 8 (1989) 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. D. Deanin, in “Applications of polymers”, edited by R.B. Seymour and H. F. Mark (Plenum Press, New York, 1988) p. 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Schlund and L. A. Utracki, Polym. Eng. Sci. 27 (1987) 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. A. Utracki and B. Schlund, Ibid. 27 (1987) 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Schlund and L. A. Utracki, Ibid. 27 (1987) 380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. A. Utracki and B. Schlund, Ibid. 27 (1987) 1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Schlund and L. A. Utracki, Ibid. 27 (1987) 1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. E. Baker, A. Rudin, H. P. Schireiber and M. El-Kindi, Ibid. 33 (1993) 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Tincer and M. Coskun, Ibid. 33 (1993) 1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. C-Y Wong, Ibid. 31 (1991) 1549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Haghighat and A. W. Birley, Plast. Rubb. Process. Appl. 13 (1990) 197.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. -Y. Wong
    • 1
  • A. D. E. Sy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems EngineeringThe University of Hong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations