Bibliography
Bell, J. S.: 1965, ‘On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox’, Physics 1, pp. 195–200.
Bohr, N.: 1935, ‘Can quantum-mechanical description of reality be considered complete?’, Physical Review 48, pp. 696–702.
Born, M. (ed.): 1971, The Born-Einstein Letters (Macmillan, London).
Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, N.: 1935, ‘Can quantum mechanical description of reality be considered complete?’, Physical Review 47, pp. 777–780.
Fine, A.: 1981, ‘Einstein's critique of quantum theory’, in Barker and Shugart (eds.) After Einstein (Memphis State University Press, Memphis), pp. 147–159.
Halpin, John F.: 1983, ‘EPR resuscitated: a reply to Wessels’, Philosophical Studies 44, pp. 111–114.
Schillp, P. A. (ed.): 1949, Albert Einstein: Philosopher Scientist (Open Court, La Salle, Illinois).
Teller, P.: 1979, ‘Quantum mechanics and the nature of continuous physical quantities’, The Journal of Philosophy LXXVI, pp. 345–362.
Wessels, L.: 1981, ‘The ‘EPR’ argument: a post-mortem’, Philosophical Studies 40, pp. 3–30.
Wessels, L.: 1985, ‘EPR resuscitated? a reply to Halpin’, Philosophical Studies 47, pp. 121–130.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I wish to thank P. J. Gumbiner and Paul Teller for helpful comments to an earlier draft of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Halpin, J.F. Completeness conditions for indeterministic theories. Philosophical Studies 49, 373–384 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355523
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355523