Marine Biology

, Volume 116, Issue 4, pp 667–683 | Cite as

Larval recruitment in response to manipulated field flows

  • L. S. Mullineaux
  • E. D. Garland
Article

Abstract

Settlement responses to boundary-layer flow of several invertebrate taxa, including the hydroid Tubularia crocea, the bryozoans Bugula turrita and Schizoporella unicornis, and the tube-building polychaete Hydroides dianthus were studied in manipulated field flows in Great Harbor, Massachusetts, USA. During three experiments in 1989 and two in 1990, densities of newly-recruited larvae were measured on flat plates, whose flow regimes had been manipulated by altering the leading-edge configurations. Settlement responses to flow were strongly species-specific, with T. crocea preferring regions of both high turbulence and strong shear stress, and S. unicornis settling a most exclusively in regions of high shear stress. B. turrita settled most prominently in regions of reduced shear stress, exhibiting settlement patterns that closely approximated predictions from a model of passive particle contact. H. dianthus showed a moderate avoidance of regions with high shear stress. These results indicate that boundary-layer flows affect settlement of several common encrusting species, a probable consequence of larval behaviors such as substrate rejection or exploration in response to flow. These responses are likely to generate patchiness during initial colonization of natural habitats, and certainly affect colonization of settlement panels commonly used in marine ecological studies.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Agrawal, Y. C., Belting, C. H. (1988). Laser velocimetry for benthic sediment transport. Deep-Sea Res. 35: 1047–1067Google Scholar
  2. Butman, C. A. (1987). Larval settlement of soft-sediment invertebrates: the spatial scales of pattern explained by active habitat selection and the emerging role of hydrodynamical processes. Oceanogr. mar. Biol. A. Rev. 25: 113–165Google Scholar
  3. Butman, C. A., Chapman, R. J. (1989). The 17-meter flume at the Coastal Research Laboratory. Part I. Description and user's manual. Tech. Rep. Woods Hole oceanogr. Instn 89-10; 1–31Google Scholar
  4. Butman, C. A., Grassle, J. P., Webb, C. M. (1988). Substrate choices made by marine larvae settling in still water and in flume flow. Nature, Lond. 333: 771–773Google Scholar
  5. Crisp, D. J. (1955). The behavior of barnacle cyprids in relation to water movement over a surface. J exp. Biol. 32: 569–590Google Scholar
  6. Crisp, D. J. (1981). Overview of research on marine invertebrate larvae, 1940–1980. In: Costlow, J. D., Tipper, R. C. (eds.) Marine biodeterioration: an interdisciplinary study. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, Maryland, p. 103–126Google Scholar
  7. Crisp, D. J., Barnes, H. (1954). The orientation and distribution of barnacles at settlement with particular reference to surface contour. J. Anim. Ecol. 23: 142–162Google Scholar
  8. Eckman, J. E. (1990). A model of passive settlement by planktonic larvae onto bottoms of differing roughness. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35: 887–901Google Scholar
  9. Eckman, J. E., Savidge, W. B., Gross, T. F. (1990). Relationship between duration of cyprid attachment and drag forces associated with detachment of Balanus amphitrite cyprids. Mar. Biol. 107: 111–118Google Scholar
  10. Garland, E. D., Mullineaux, L. S. (1992). Particle contact on flat plates in flow: a model for initial larval contact. Tech. Rep. Woods Hole oceanogr. Instn 92-26: 1–27Google Scholar
  11. Havenhand, J. N., Svane, I. (1991). Roles of hydrodynamics and larval behaviour in determining spatial aggregation in the tunicate Ciona intestinalis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 68: 271–276Google Scholar
  12. Jackson, J. B. C. (1977). Habitat area, colonization, and development of epibenthic community structure. In: Keegan, B. F., Ceidigh, P. O., Boaden, P. J. S. (eds.) Biology of benthic organisms. Pergamon Press, Oxford p. 349–358Google Scholar
  13. Keen, S. L. (1987). Recruitment of Aurelia aurita (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa) larvae is position-dependent, and independent of conspecific density, within a settling surface. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 83: 151–160Google Scholar
  14. Keough, M. J., Downes, B. J. (1982). Recruitment of marine invertebrates: the role of active larval choices and early mortality. Oecologia 54: 348–352Google Scholar
  15. Kiya, M., Sasaki, K. (1983). Structure of a turbulent separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 137: 83–113Google Scholar
  16. Miller, R. L., Albro, C. S., Cohen, J. M., O'Sullivan, J. F. (1972). A preliminary study of tidal erosion in Great Harbor at Woods Hole, Massachusetts. Tech. Rep. Woods Hole oceanogr. Instn 72-12Google Scholar
  17. Mullineaux, L. S., Butman, C. A. (1990). Recruitment of benthic invertebrates in boundary-layer flows: a deep water experiment on Cross Seamount. Limnol. Oceanogr. 32: 409–423Google Scholar
  18. Mullineaux, L. S., Butman, C. A. (1991). Initial contact, exploration and attachment of barnacle (Balanus amphitrite) cyprids settling in flow. Mar. Biol. 110: 93–103Google Scholar
  19. Nowell, A. R. M., Jumars, P. A. (1984). Flow environments of aquatic benthos. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 303–328Google Scholar
  20. Osman, R. W. (1977). The establishment and development of a marine epifaunal community. Ecol. Monogr. 47: 37–63Google Scholar
  21. Pawlik, J. R., Butman, C. A., Starczak, V. R. (1991). Hydrodynamic facilitation of gregarious settlement of a reef-building tube worm. Science, N.Y. 251: 421–424Google Scholar
  22. Pyefinch, K. A., Downing, F. S. (1949). Notes on the general biology of Tubularia larynx Ellis and Solander. J. mar. biol. Ass. UK 28: 21–43Google Scholar
  23. Redfield, A. C. (1953). Interference phenomenon in the tides of the Woods Hole region. J. mar. Res. 12: 121–139Google Scholar
  24. Rittschof, D., Branscomb, E. S., Costlow, J. D. (1984). Settlement and behavior in relation to flow and surface in larval barnacles, Balanus amphitrite Darwin. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 82: 131–146Google Scholar
  25. Roberts, D., Rittschof, D., Holm, E., Schmidt, A. R. (1991). Factors influencing initial larval settlement: temporal, spatial and surface molecular components. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 150: 203–211Google Scholar
  26. Ruderich, R., Fernholz, H. H. (1986). An experimental investigation of a turbulent shear flow with separation, reverse flow, and reattachment. J. Fluid Mech. 163: 283–322Google Scholar
  27. Scheltema, R. S., Williams, I. P., Shaw, M. A., Loudon, C. (1981). Gregarious settlement by the larvae of Hydroides dianthus (Polychaeta: Serpulidae). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 5: 69–74Google Scholar
  28. Schlichting, H. (1979). Boundary-layer theory. 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Schoener, A., Schoener, T. W. (1981). The dynamics of the species-area relation in marine fouling systems: 1. Biological correlates of changes in the species-area slope. Am. Nat. 118: 339–360Google Scholar
  30. Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J. (1969). Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W. H. Freeman & Co., San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  31. Sutherland, J. P. (1978). Functional roles of Schizoporella and Styela in the fouling community at Beaufort, North carolina. Ecology 59: 257–264Google Scholar
  32. Walters, L. J. (1992). Field settlement locations of subtidal marine hard substrata: is active larval exploration involved? Limnol. Oceanogr. 37: 1101–1107Google Scholar
  33. Wethey, D. (1986). Ranking of settlement cues by barnacle larvae: influence of surface contour. Bull. mar. Sci. 39: 393–400Google Scholar
  34. Underwood, A. J., Fairweather, P. G. (1989). Supply-side ecology and benthic marine assemblages. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4: 16–20Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. S. Mullineaux
    • 1
  • E. D. Garland
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentWoods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA

Personalised recommendations