Skip to main content
Log in

Subsidiary obligation

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Feldman, Fred: 1983, ‘Obligations — absolute, conditioned, conditional’, Philosophia 12, pp. 257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldman, Holly S.: 1978, ‘Doing the best one can.’ In Values and Morals, edited by A. I. Goldman and J. Kim (D. Reidel, Dordrecht), pp. 185–214.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Greenspan, Patricia S.: 1975, ‘Conditional oughts and hypothetical imperatives’, Journal of Philosophy 72, pp. 259–276.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greenspan, Patricia S.: 1978, ‘Oughts and determinism: A reply to Goldman’, Philosophical Review 87, pp. 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lehrer, Keith: 1976, ‘ “Can” in theory and practice: A possible worlds analysis.’ In Myles Brand and Douglas Walton (ed.), Action Theory (D. Reidel, Dordrecht), pp. 241–270.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McKinsey, Michael: 1975, ‘Levels of obligation’, Philosophical Studies 35, pp. 385–395.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vorobej, Mark: 1983, ‘Conditional obligation and detachment.’ Read at the meeting of the Eastern Division of the American Philosophical Association, December 1983.

  8. Zimmerman, Michael J.: 1981, ‘ “Can”, compatibilism, and possible worlds’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11, pp. 679–691.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimmerman, M.J. Subsidiary obligation. Philosophical Studies 50, 65–75 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355161

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355161

Navigation