Conclusion
The preceding theory represents, I believe, a large improvement over conceptual graph theories of analogy. In particular, it is possible for analogical reasoning to be flexible or ‘creative’ on this approach, an aspect of analogy that is not accounted for in conceptual graph theories. I also believe that searching by constraint violations is a more reasonable way to organize memory search than to look for properties of conceptual hierarchies. Proof of this last point, however, awaits an more detailed classification of the constraints that figure in analogical reasoning.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Helman, D.H. Situation semantics and models of analogy. Philosophical Studies 49, 231–244 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354337
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354337