Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of mesh size on estimation of population densities of tropical euthecosomatous pteropods

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Euthecosomatous pteropods were collected in successive oblique plankton tows with 1 m diameter nets equipped with No. 0, No. 6, and No. 20 nylon mesh. Comparisons of samples revealed that the same species were collected by all 3 nets, but the No. 0 and No. 6 nets failed to collect veligers and juveniles of Spiratella inflata and Creseis virgula conica. Collections with nets of larger mesh size may erroneously suggest seasonal variations in population densities due, not to actual changes in total density, but to changes in the size of individuals and changes in the relative numbers of the different life stages. A large diameter net equipped with No. 20 mesh is recommended for work that includes the smallest life stages of tropical pteropods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Boltovsky, D.: Pteropodos thecosomados del Atlantico suboccidental. Malacologia 11, 121–140 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. and A. W. H. Bé: Seasonal distributions of euthecosomatous pteropods in the surface waters of five stations in the western North Atlantic. Bull. mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb. 14, 185–220 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalli, C. M. and F. E. Wells, Jr.: Brood protection in an epipelagic thecosomatous pteropod, Spiratella (“Limacina”) inflata (d'Orbigny). Bull. mar. Sci. (In Press).

  • Lewis, J. B. and A. G. Fish: Seasonal variation of the zooplankton fauna of surface waters entering the Caribbean Sea at Barbados. Caribb. J. Sci. 9 (1 and 2), 1–24 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, J. A. and V. J. Fraundorf: The relationship between size of net used and estimates of zooplankton diversity. Limnol. Oceanogr. 11, 456–469 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. B.: The zooplankton of the upper waters of the Bermuda area of the North Atlantic. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 12, 1–97 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, T. D.: Horizontal and vertical distribution of thecosomatous pteropods off Cape Hatteras, 224 pp. Unpublished PhD. dissertation, Duke University 1968.

  • Tesch, J. J.: The thecosomatous pteropods. I. The Atlantic. Dana Rep. 28, 1–82 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiriot-Quievreux, C.: Variations saisonnières des mollusques dans le plancton de la région de Banyuls-sur-Mer (zone Sud du golfe de Lion) novembre 1965–décembre 1967. Vie Milieu (Sér. B) 20, 35–83 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tranter, D. J. and J. H. Fraser (Eds.): Zooplankton sampling. Monographs on oceanographic methodology 2, 174 pp. Paris: U.N.E.S.C.O. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wormelle, R. L.: A survey of the standing crop of plankton of the Florida Current. VI. A study of the distribution of the pteropods of the Florida Current. Bull. mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb. 12, 95–136 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by T. R. Parsons, Vancouver

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wells, F.E. Effects of mesh size on estimation of population densities of tropical euthecosomatous pteropods. Marine Biology 20, 347–350 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354276

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354276

Keywords

Navigation