Journal of Comparative Physiology B

, Volume 164, Issue 3, pp 222–228 | Cite as

Physiology of cold hardiness in cocoons of five earthworm taxa (Lumbricidae: Oligochaeta)

  • M. Holmstrup
Article

Abstract

Earthworm cocoons are mostly found in the uppermost soil layers and are therefore often exposed to low temperatures during winter. In the present study, cocoons of five taxa of earthworms were investigated for their tolerance to freezing, melting points of cocoon fluids and dehydration of cocoons when exposed to a frozen environment. Embryos of the taxa investigated were freeze intolerant. The melting points of fully hydrated cocoon fluids were high (above −0.3°C) and thermal hysteresis factors were absent. Exposure to a frozen environment caused the cocoons to dehydrate drastically and dehydrated cocoons showed significantly lower super-cooling points than fully hydrated cocoons, reducing the risk of freezing for dehydrated cocoons. It is proposed therefore that the cold-hardiness strategy of the earthworm cocoons is based on dehydration upon exposure to subzero temperatures in the frozen environment. Cocoons of three surface-dwelling taxa, Dendrobaena octaedra, Dendrodrilus rubidus tenuis and Dendrodrilus rubidus norvegicus had lower supercooling points and survived frost exposure better than cocoons of two deeper-dwelling taxa, Aporrectodea caliginosa and Allolobophora chlorotica. One of the investigated taxa, D. r. norvegicus, was collected from a cold alpine habitat. However, it was not more cold hardy than the closely related D. r. tenuis collected from a lowland temperate habitat. D. octaedra was the most cold hardy taxon, its cocoons being able to withstand −8°C for 3 months and −13.5°C for 2 weeks in frozen soil.

Key words

Cold hardiness Dehydration Freeze-intolerance Vapour pressure Earthworm cocoons 

Abbreviations

dw

dry weight

fw

fresh weight

SCP

supercooling point

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asahina E (1969) Frost resistance in insects. Adv Insect Physiol 6:1–49Google Scholar
  2. Block W (1982) Cold hardiness in invertebrate poikilotherms. Comp Biochem Physiol 73A:581–593Google Scholar
  3. Holmstrup M (1992) Cold hardiness strategy in cocoons of the lumbricid earthworm Dendrobaena octaedra (Savigny). Comp Biochem Physiol 10A:49–54Google Scholar
  4. Holmstrup M, Hansen BT, Nielsen A, Østergaard IK (1990) Frost tolerance of lumbricid earthworm cocoons. Pedobiologia 34:361–366Google Scholar
  5. Holmstrup M, Østergaard IK, Nielsen A, Hansen BT (1991) The relationship between temperature and cocoon incubation time for some lumbricid earthworm species. Pedobiologia 35:179–184Google Scholar
  6. Hopp H (1947) The ecology of earthworms in cropland. Proc Soil Sci Am 12:503–507Google Scholar
  7. Huhta V (1978) Mortality in enchytraeid and lumbricid populations caused by hard frosts. Proc Symp: “Adaptions of animals on winter conditions”. MoscowGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee KE (1985) Earthworms. Their ecology and relationships with soils and land use. Academic Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee RE (1991) Principles of insect low temperature tolerance. In: Lee RE, Denlinger D (eds) Insects at low temperature. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 17–46Google Scholar
  10. Oglesby LC (1969) Inorganic components and metabolism; ionic and osmotic regulation: Annelida, Sipuncula and Echiura. In: Florkin M, Scheer BT (eds) Chemical zoology, vol IV: Annelida, Echiura and Sipuncula. Academic Press, New York, pp 211–310Google Scholar
  11. Satchell JE (1980) R worms and K worms: a basis for classifying lumbricid earthworm strategies. In: Dindal DL (ed) Soil biology as related to land use practises. Proc VII Int Coll Soil Zool, pp 848–864Google Scholar
  12. Schmidt-Nielsen K (1990) Animal physiology. Adaptations and environment, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Stöp-Bowitz C (1969) A contribution to our knowledge of the systematics and zoogeography of Norwegian earthworms (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae). Nytt Mag Zool 17:169–280Google Scholar
  14. Sømme L (1974) The overwintering of Pelophila borealis Payk. III. Freezing tolerance. Norsk Ent Tidsskr 21:131–134Google Scholar
  15. Weast RC (1989) Handbook of chemistry and physics, 70th edn. CRC Press, ClevelandGoogle Scholar
  16. Zachariassen KE (1985) Physiology of cold tolerance in insects. Physiol Rev 65:799–831Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Holmstrup
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Biological Sciences, Department of ZoologyUniversity of ÅrhusÅrhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations