Skip to main content
Log in

A counterexample in the theory of random orders

  • Published:
Order Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show that the 0–1 law fails in random orders of fixed dimension k, k≥3. In particular, we give an example of a first-order sentence ϕ, in the language of partial orders, which cannot have limiting probability 0 or 1 among random orders of dimension 3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. J. Compton (1988) The computational complexity of asymptotic problems I: partial orders, Inform. and Computation, to appear.

  2. B. Dushnik and E. W. Miller (1941) Partially ordered sets, Amer. J. Math. 63, 600–610.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Kelly and W. T. Trotter (1981) Dimension theory for ordered sets, in Ordered Sets (ed. I. Rival), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 171–211.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Winkler (1985) Random orders, Orders 1, 317–331.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Winkler (1985) Connectedness and diameter for random orders of fixed dimension, Order 2, 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Winkler (1988) Orders of dimension 2, preprint.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by P. Hell

Research supported by ONR grant N00014-85-K-0769

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winkler, P. A counterexample in the theory of random orders. Order 5, 363–368 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353655

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353655

AMS subject classifications (1980)

Key words

Navigation