Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Chisholm's argument to show that a person cannot be an ens successivum

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Connecticut, USA

    Susan Leigh Anderson

Authors
  1. Susan Leigh Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This paper was written while I was an NEH fellow attending a seminar given by Roderick Chisholm at Brown University in the summer of 1978.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, S.L. Chisholm's argument to show that a person cannot be an ens successivum. Philosophical Studies 37, 111–113 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353509

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353509

Search

Navigation