Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 413–457 | Cite as

A unified analysis of the English bare plural

  • Greg N. Carlson


It is argued that the English ‘bare plural’ (an NP with plural head that lacks a determiner), in spite of its apparently diverse possibilities of interpretation, is optimally represented in the grammar as a unified phenomenon. The chief distinction to be dealt with is that between the ‘generic’ use of the bare plural (as in ‘Dogs bark’) and its existential or ‘indefinite plural’ use (as in ‘He threw oranges at Alice’). The difference between these uses is not to be accounted for by an ambiguity in the NP itself, but rather by explicating how the context of the sentence acts on the bare plural to give rise to this distinction. A brief analysis is sketched in which bare plurals are treated in all instances as proper names of kinds of things. A subsidiary argument is that the null determiner is not to be regarded as the plural of the indefinite article a.


Unify Analysis Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Unify Phenomenon Bare Plural 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bennett, Michael: 1975, Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English, UCLA Ph.D. Dissertation reproduced by the Indiana Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, Michael and Barbara H. Partee: 1972, ‘Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English’, ms.Google Scholar
  3. Burton-Roberts, Noel: 1976, ‘On the Generic Indefinite Article’, Language 52, 2, pp. 427–448.Google Scholar
  4. Carlson, Greg N.: 1973, ‘Superficially Unquantified Plural Count Noun Phrases in English’, U. of Iowa M. A. Thesis, unpublished.Google Scholar
  5. Cartwright, Helen: 1965, ‘Heraclitus and the Bathwater’, Philosophical Review 74, pp. 466–485.Google Scholar
  6. Cartwright, Helen: 1975, ‘Some Remarks on Mass Nouns and Plurality’, Synthese 31, pp. 395–410.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, Noam: 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, Noam: 1975, ‘Questions of Form and Interpretation’, Linguistic Analysis 1, 1.Google Scholar
  9. Dahl, Östen: 1975, ‘On Generics’, in Keenan ed. Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Delorme, Evelyn and Ray, Dougherty: 1972, ‘Appositive NP Constructions’, Foundations of Language 8, 1.Google Scholar
  11. Dowty, David R.: 1972, Studies in the Logic of Verb Aspect and Time Reference in English, Ph.D. dissertation, U. of Texas at Austin. Published in Studies in Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  12. Gough, JamesJr.: 1969, ‘The Syntax-Based Semantics of the English Determiners a, the, and ϕ, Papers in Linguistics 1 1.Google Scholar
  13. Lawler, John: 1972, ‘Generic to a Fault’, Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Ed. Parenteau et al. CLS.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, David: 1975, ‘Adverbs of Quantification’, in Keenan, ed. Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. McCawley, James D.: 1970, ‘Where Do Noun Phrases Come From?’ in ed. Jacobs and Rosenbaum, Readings in English Transformation Grammar, Ginn and Co. Waltham, Mass.Google Scholar
  16. Milsark Gary: 1974, ‘Existential Sentences in English’, unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
  17. Montague, Richard: 1972, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in Thomason, ed. (1974) Formal Philosophy: the Selected Papers of Richard Montague, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Parsons, Terence: 1970, ‘An Analysis of Mass and Amount Terms’, Foundations of Language 6, 363–388.Google Scholar
  19. Partee, Barbara H.: 1970, ‘Opacity, Coreference, and Pronouns’, Synthese 21.Google Scholar
  20. Partee, Barbara H.: 1975, ‘Deletion and Variable Binding’, in Keenen, ed. Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Perlmutter, David: 1970, ‘On the Article in English’, in Bierwisch and Heidolph, eds. Progress in Linguistics.Google Scholar
  22. Postal, Paul: 1969, ‘Anaphoric Islands’, in Binnick et al. Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. CLS.Google Scholar
  23. Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Schachter, Paul: 1976, ‘A Nontransformational Account of Gerundive Nominals in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 7, 2.Google Scholar
  25. Siegel, Mufft E. A.: 1976, ‘Capturing the Adjective’, unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, Carlotta: 1964, ‘Determiners and Relative Clauses in a Generative Grammar of English’, Language 40, 1.Google Scholar
  27. Stockwell, Robert P., P. Schachter, and B. H. Partee: 1973, The Major Syntactic Structures of English, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Sweet, Henry: 1898, A New English Grammar, Oxford.Google Scholar
  29. Zemach, Eddy: 1975, ‘On the Adequacy a Type Ontology’, Synthese 31, pp. 509–515.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Greg N. Carlson
    • 1
  1. 1.South CollegeUniversity of MassachusettsUSA

Personalised recommendations