Marine Biology

, Volume 125, Issue 3, pp 447–452 | Cite as

Diet of anguilloid larvae: leptocephali feed selectively on larvacean houses and fecal pellets

  • N. Mochioka
  • M. Iwamizu


Gut contents of 234 leptocephali comprising eight species of eels were examined from five families (Congridae, Muraenidae, Muraenesocidae, Nettastomatidae, and Ophichthidae). The larvae belonged to developing leptocephalus (215 specimens) and the early metamorphic stage (19 specimens). Visible gut contents were recognized in 111 individuals among the eight species, regardless of developmental stage. Two kinds of visible objects, transparent (0.4 to 1.2 mm) and opaque (20 to 380 μm), were found in the gut of leptocephali. From their morphological characteristics, the former and the latter were identified as larvacean houses and zooplankton fecal pellets, respectively. Furthermore, most fecal pellets in the gut were identified as oikopleurid larvacean's fecal pellets. No trace of the many other phytoplankton or zooplankton, which were found with leptocephali in the ambient waters and could be suitable-size food, was found in the gut of any leptocephalus. On the basis of the importance of larvecean houses in the diet of several species of leptocephalus larvae, it is proposed that the peculiar, large, fang-like teeth of leptocephali are used for feeding, and evolved to pierce and grasp the mucous houses of larvaceans.


Phytoplankton Developmental Stage Morphological Characteristic Fecal Pellet Visible Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alldredge AL (1972) Abandoned larvacean houses: a unique food source in the pelagic environment. Science, NY 177: 885–887Google Scholar
  2. Alldredge AL (1976a) Discarded appendicularian houses as sources of food, surface habitats, and particulate organic matter in planktonic environments. Limnol Oceanogr 21: 14–23Google Scholar
  3. Alldredge AL (1976b) Field behavior and adaptive strategies of appendicularians (Chordata: Tunicata). Mar Biol 38: 29–39Google Scholar
  4. Alldredge AL (1977) House morphology and mechanisms of feeding in the Oikopleuridae (Tunicata, Appendicularia). J Zool, Lond 181: 175–188Google Scholar
  5. Hiromi J, Hiyama H, Kadota S (1988) Morphological observations of fecal pellets produced by inlet water copepods under experimental conditions Bull Coll Agric Vet Med Nihon Univ 45: 219–226Google Scholar
  6. Hulet WH (1978) Structure and functional development of the eel leptocephalus Ariosoma balearicum (de la Roche, 1809). Phil Trans R Soc (Ser B) 282: 107–138Google Scholar
  7. Hulet WH, Robins CR (1989) The evolutionary significance of the leptocephalus larva. In: Böhlke EB (ed) Fishes of the western North Atlantic. Sears Foundation for Marine Research (Memoir No. I, Part 9 Vol. 2) New Haven, Connecticut, pp 669–677Google Scholar
  8. Kracht R, Tesch F-W (1981) Progress report on the eel expedition of R.V. “Anton Dohrn” and R.V. “Friedrich Heincke” to the Sargasso Sea 1979. Envir Biol Fish 6: 371–375Google Scholar
  9. Kubota S (1961) Studies on the ecology, growth and metamorphosis in conger eel, Conger myriaster (Brevoort). J Fac Fish Mie Pref Univ 5: 190–370Google Scholar
  10. Mochioka N (1988) Congridae. In: Okiyama M (ed) An atlas of the early stage fishes in Japan. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp 44–54Google Scholar
  11. Mochioka N, Iwamizu M, Kanda T (1993) Leptocephalus eel larvae will feed in aquaria. Envir Biol Fish 36: 381–384Google Scholar
  12. Moser HG (1981) Morphological and functional aspects of marine fish larvae. In: Lasker R (ed) Marine fish larvae: morphology, ecology, and relation to fisheries Washington Sea Grant Program, Seattle, pp 90–131Google Scholar
  13. Ohtsuka S, Kubo N (1991) Larvaceans and their houses as impotant food for some pelagic copepods. Proceedings of the 4th international conference of copepoda. Bull Plankton Soc Japan (Spec, Vol.) 1991: 535–551Google Scholar
  14. Ohtsuka S, Kubo N, Okada M, Gushima K (1993) Attachment and feeding of pelagic copepods on larvacean houses. J Oceanogr 49: 115–120Google Scholar
  15. Otake T, Nogami K, Maruyama K (1993) Dissolved and particulate organic matter as possible food sources for eel leptocephali. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 92: 27–34Google Scholar
  16. Pfeiler E (1986) Towards an explanation of the developmental strategy in leptocephalous larvae of marine teleost fishes. Envir Biol Fish 15: 3–13Google Scholar
  17. Satoh H (1979) Attempts to culture the Japanese eel. Iden 33: 23–30 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  18. Satoh H, Yamamori K, Hibiya T (1992) Induced spawning of the Japanese eel. Nippon Suisan Gakk 58: 825–832Google Scholar
  19. Schmidt J (1925) The breeding place of the eel. Smithsonian report for 1924. Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, pp 79–316Google Scholar
  20. Taguchi S (1982) Seasonal study of fecal pellets and discarded houses of appendicularia in a subtropical inlet, Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii. Estuar cstl Shelf Sci 14: 545–555Google Scholar
  21. Wang Y, Zhao C, Shin Z, Ten Y, Zhang K, Yuanshan L, Yang Y, Hong Y (1980) Studies on the artificial inducement of reproduction in common eel. Shui Chan Xue Bao (J Fish China) 4: 146–156Google Scholar
  22. Westerberg H (1990) A proposal regarding the source of nutrition of leptocephalus larvae. Int Revue ges Hydrobiol 75: 863–864Google Scholar
  23. Yamamoto K, Yamauchi K (1974) Sexual maturation of Japanese eel and production of eel larvae in the aquarium. Nature, Lond 251: 220–222Google Scholar
  24. Yamauchi K, Nakamura M, Takahashi H, Takano K 1976 Cultivation of larvae of the Japanese eel. Nature, Lond 263: p 412Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Mochioka
    • 1
  • M. Iwamizu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries, Faculty of AgricultureKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations