Skip to main content
Log in

Work status and the quality of life

  • Articles
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The general thesis from which this paper derived is that objective conditions are related to perceptions and evaluations of those conditions, but that such relationships are mediated by personal characteristics such as expectation and aspiration levels, and other motivational factors. The specific relationship examined is that between work status and overall life satisfaction among women. Although there is little difference in average levels of life satisfaction expressed by housewives and by women working outside the home, substantial differences emerge when women are distinguished by their motivation with respect to paid work: among women who want jobs, working women are more satisfied with their lives than are housewives; while among those who would prefer not to work, housewives are more satisfied. Evidence is also found in support of a hypothesis that work tends to be less central to the overall quality of women's lives than is true for men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Bradburn, Norman M., The Structure of Psychological Well-being, Chicago, Aldine, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse and Willard L. Rodgers, The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations and Satisfactions, New York, Russell Sage, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantril, Hadley, The Pattern of Human Concerns, New Brunswick, N. J., Rutgers University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Beverly and Mark Evers, ‘Measuring Change in Attitudes toward Women's Work’, pp. 129–155 in K. C. Land and S. Spilerman (eds.), Social Indicator Models, New York, Russell Sage, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, Michael J., A Study in Comparative Urban Indicators: Conditions in 18 Large Metropolitan Areas, Washington, D.C., The Urban Institute, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, John R. P.Jr., Willard L. Rodgers and Sidney Cobb, ‘Adjustment as personenvironment fit’, pp. 316–333 in G. V. Coelho, D. Hamburg and J. Adams (eds.), Coping and Adaption, New York, Basic Books, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, Gerald, Joseph, Veroff and Sheila, Feld, Americans View Their Mental Health, New York, Basic Books, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebergott, Stanley, ‘Labor force and employment trends’, pp. 97–143 in Eleanor B. Sheldon and Wilbert E. Moore (eds.), Indicators of Social Change, New York, Russell Sage, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitin, Teresa, Robert P. Quinn and Graham L. Staines, ‘Sex discrimination against the American working woman’, American Behavioral Scientist 15 (1971), 237–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marans, Robert W. and Willard L. Rodgers, ‘Toward an understanding of community satisfaction’, pp. 299–352 in Amos H. Hawley and Vincent P. Rock (eds.), Metropolitan America in Contemporaty Perspective, New York, Halsted Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget, Social Indicators, 1973, Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, John P. and Philip E. Converse, ‘Social change reflected in the use of time’, pp. 17–86 in Angus Campbell and Philip E. Converse (eds.), The Human Meaning of Social Change, New York, Russell Sage, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, Willard L. and Philip E. Converse, ‘Measures of the perceived overall quality of life’, Social Indicators Research 2 (1975), 127–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, Elizabeth and Kathryn R. Gover, ‘Marital and family characteristics of the labor force’, Monthly Labor Review 95 (1972), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is based on data from a study, ‘Monitoring the Quality of American Life’, that was funded primarily by the Russell Sage Foundation. A fuller report of the findings from this study is provided in Campbell, Converse, and Rodgers (1976).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodgers, W.L. Work status and the quality of life. Social Indicators Research 4, 267–287 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353134

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353134

Keywords

Navigation