Skip to main content
Log in

The validity of Weibull estimators

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The parameters of the two-parametric Weibull distribution, the Weibull modulus and the scale parameter, were estimated by using not only analytical means but also Monte-Carlo simulations. The precision of the measurement of both parameters, i.e. their variation coefficient, has been calculated. It is shown that the variation coefficient of the scale parameter is dependent on the number of experiments, M, which were performed, and on the Weibull modulus itself, whereas the variation coefficient of the Weibull modulus is only dependent on M. Furthermore, the correctly interpreted results show that each single measurement gives the statistically correct Weibull parameters and the biasing arises only from the method of adding single measurements to obtain a mean value. Thus, in practice, when only one set of experiments for further evaluation is available, there is no need for adjustment factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. WEIBULL, J. Appl. Mech. 18 (1951) 293.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. MUNZ and T. FETT, “Mechanisches Verhalten keramischer Werkstoffe” (Springer, Berlin, 1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. J. RITTER, N. BANDYOPADHYAY and K. JAKUS, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 60 (1981) 798.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. L. J. BAIN and C. E. ANTLE, Technometrics 9 (1967) 621.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. R. THOMAN, L. J. BAIN and C. E. ANTLE, ibid. 11 (1969) 445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. TRUSTRUM and A. DE S. JAYATILAKA, J. Mater. Sci. 14 (1979) 1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. BERGMAN, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 3 (1984) 689.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. D. SULLIVAN and P. H. LAUZON, ibid. 5 (1986) 1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. FAUCHER and W. R. TYSON, ibid. 7 (1988) 199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. KHALILI and K. KROMP, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1991) 6741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. PETERLIK, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 13 (1994) 509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. CEN Standard draft EN 843-3: “Determination of subcritical crack growth parameters from constant stressing rate flexural strength tests, 1992”.

  13. H. PETERLIK and K. KROMP, Fortschrittsber. Deutsch. Keram. Ges. 9 [1] (1994) 78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peterlik, H. The validity of Weibull estimators. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE 30, 1972–1976 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353020

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353020

Keywords

Navigation