Skip to main content
Log in

Subjective evaluation of well-being: Problems and prospects

  • Articles
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses some of the substantive and methodological pitfalls that arise in the subjective evaluation of well-being. The discussion includes illustrative references to the empirical findings of the 1977 Edmonton Area Study. Issues discussed include (1) specific, domain, and global measures; (2) objective states and subjective perceptions; (3) micro and macro units of analysis; and (4) the problem of cultural relativism. It is concluded that it is not yet possible to delineate a simple set of social indicators for use by policy-makers and social planners. Accurate assessment of social well-being currently requires the study of demographic and objective states together with cognitive and evaluational responses and also requires assessment not only at the global ‘general satisfaction’ level but also at more specific levels of analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Andrews, F. M. and Withey, S. B.: 1974, ‘Developing measures of perceived life quality: Results from several national studies’, Social Indicators Research 1, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, S.: 1976, ‘Subjective social indicators for urban areas: How useful for policy?’, Sociological Focus 9, pp. 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1975, ‘What is a quality of life indicator?’, Social Indicators Research 2, pp. 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., and Rodgers, W. L.: 1975, The Quality of American Life (Russell Sage, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Consultative Group of Survey Research: 1976, ‘Survey Research’ (Canada Council, Ottawa).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F. S.: 1968, ‘Activity systems and urban structure: A working schema’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners XXXIV, pp. 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, F. E. and Reynolds, D. R.: 1971, ‘Effects of urban spatial structure on individual behaviour’, Economic Geography XLVII, pp. 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carp, F. M., Zawadski, R. T., and Shokron, H.: 1976, ‘Dimensions of Urban environmental quality’, Environment and Behaviour 8, pp. 239–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S.: 1975, ‘Quality of life’, Social Indicators Research 2, pp. 229–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. and Nisbet, R.: 1971, Contemporary Social Problems (Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, W.: 1975, ‘Urbanism and ways of living: The changing view of planning researchers’, Ekistics 40/236, pp. 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. S.: 1961, ‘Ecological correlations and the behaviour of individuals’, in G. A., Theodorson (ed.), Studies in Human Ecology (Row Peterson, Evanston, Ill.), pp. 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, W. L. and Converse, P. E.: 1975, ‘Perceived quality of life’, Social Indicators Research 2, pp. 127–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M.: 1976, ‘The “Quality of Life” and social indicators research’, Public Administration Review 36, pp. 297–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, E. B. and Freeman, H. E.: 1970, ‘Notes on social indicators: Promises and potential’, Policy Sciences 1, pp. 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors are indebted to Earle Snider for his useful comments on our discussion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, L.W., Northcott, H.C. & Kinzel, C. Subjective evaluation of well-being: Problems and prospects. Social Indicators Research 5, 457–474 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352943

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352943

Keywords

Navigation