Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 1043–1051 | Cite as

Reactivities of aluminium and aluminium-magnesium alloy powders in polymeric composites

  • S. Deevi
  • S. C. Deevi
  • V. R. Pai Verneker§
Article

Abstract

Polymeric compositions containing Al-Mg alloys show higher reactivities, in comparison with similar compositions containing aluminium. This is observed irrespective of the amount of oxidizer, type of oxidizer used, type of polymeric binder, and over a range of the particle sizes of the metal additive. This is evident from the higher calorimetric values obtained for compositions containing the alloy, in comparison to samples containing aluminium. Analysis of the combustion residue shows the increase in calorimetric value to be due to the greater extent of oxidation of the alloy. The interaction between the polymeric binder and the alloy was studied by coating the metal particles with the polymer by a coacervation technique. On ageing in the presence of ammonium perchlorate, cracking of the polymer coating on the alloy was noticed. This was deduced from differential thermal analysis experiments, and confirmed by scanning electron microscopic observations. The increase in stiffness of the coating, leading to cracking, has been traced to the cross-linking of the polymer by magnesium.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. G. Merzhanov and I. P. Borovinskaya, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 204 (1972) 366.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. L. Frankhouser, K. W. Brendley, M. C. Kieszek and S. T. Sullivan, “Gasless Combustion Synthesis of Refractory Compounds” (Noyes, New Jersey, 1985).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Z. A. Munir, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 67 (1988) 342.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. R. Pai Verneker, Sarojini Deevi and Seetharama C. Deevi, Combust. Flame 67 (1987) 163.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. L. Fritzlen, US Pat. 3044 911, 17 July 1962, 4pp.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. I. Breiter, L. YA. Kashprov, V. M. Malt'sev, P. F. Pokhil, W. I. Popov, V. I. Pepekin, and A. G. Stasenko, Combust. Explos. Shock Waves. 7 (2) (1971) 186.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. R. Simms, B. Y. S. Lee and J. E. Crump, AIAA paper 66–616 (1966).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. S. Cohen, AIAA J. 7 (1969) 1345.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. S. Cohen and R. L. Derr, NASACR-111813, 1 November 1970.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. B. Northam and E. M. Sullivan, 9th JANNAF Combustion Meeting”, Monterey, CA, September 1972.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. R. Pai Verneker, D. Seetharamacharyulu and R. M. Mallya, J. Spacecr. Rockets 16 (1979) 436.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. E. Sparks, in “Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology”, Vol. 15, 3rd Edn (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1981) p. 470.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. R. Pai Verneker, D. Seetharamacharyulu and R. M. Mallya, J. Solid State Chem. 39 (1981) 154.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. W. M. Jacobs and H. M. Whitehead, Chem. Rev. 69 (1969) 551.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. R. Dyer, “Applications of absorption spectroscopy of organic compounds” (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1965).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. B. Pearson, “Handbook of Lattice Spacings in Metals and Alloys” (1958).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. A. Skinner (ed.), “Experimental Thermochemistry”, Vol. II (Interscience, New York, London, 1962).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. B. Pilling and R. E. Bedworth, J. Inst. Metals 29 (1923) 529.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. M. Malt'Sev, YU. D. Chistyakov and M. I. Tsypin, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Fiz. 20 (1956) 824.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sarojini Deevi, K. Kishore and V. R. Pai Verneker, J. Propuls. Power 5 (1989) 411.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Morton, in “Developments in Polymerizations-3” (Developments Series) edited by R. N. Haward (Applied Science Publishers, 1982).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Deevi
    • 1
  • S. C. Deevi
    • 1
  • V. R. Pai Verneker§
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.CeraMat TechnologiesMidlothianUSA
  3. 3.Research and Development CenterPhilip Morris USARichmondUSA
  4. 4.Pai Research Inc.BaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations