Skip to main content
Log in

Genomic mapping by single copy landmark detection: a predictive model with a discrete mathematical approach

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Mammalian Genome Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the goals of the Human Genome Project is to produce libraries of largely contiguous, ordered sets of molecular clones for use in sequencing and gene mapping projects. This is planned to be done for human and many model organisms. Theory and practice have shown that long-range contiguity and the degree to which the entire genome is covered by ordered clones can be affected by many biological variables. Many laboratories are currently experimenting with different experimental strategies and theoretical models to help plan strategies for accomplishing longrange molecular mapping of genomes. Here we describe a new mathematical model and formulas for helping to plan genome mapping projects, using various single-copy landmark (SCL) detection, or “anchoring”, strategies. We derive formulas that allow us to examine the effects of interactions among the following variables: average insert size of the cloning vector, average size of SCL, the number of SCL, and the redundancy in coverage of the clone library. We also examine and compare three different ways in which anchoring can be implemented: (1) anchors are selected independently of the library to be ordered (random anchoring); (2) anchors are made from end probes from both ends of clones in the library to be ordered (nonrandom anchoring); and (3) anchors are made from one end or the other, randomly, from clones in the library to be ordered (nonrandom anchoring). Our results show that, for biologically realistic conditions, nonrandom anchoring is always more effective than random anchoring for contig building, and there is little to be gained from making SCL from both ends of clones vs. only one end of clones. We compare and contrast our results with other similar mathematical models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arratia, R., Lander, E.S., Tavaré, S., and Waterman, M.S.: Genomic mapping by anchoring random clones: a mathematical analysis. Genomics 11: 806–825, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barillot, E., Dausset, J., and Cohen, D.: Theoretical analysis of a physical mapping strategy using random single-copy landmarks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 3917–3921, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branscomb, E., Slezak, T., Pae, R., Galas, D., Carrano, A.V., and Waterman, M.S.: Optimizing restriction fragment fingerprinting methods for ordering large genomic libraries. Genomics 8: 351–366, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrano, A.V., Lamerdin, J., Ashworth, L.K., Watkins, B., Branscomb, E., Slezak, T., Raff, M., DeJong, P.J., Keith, D., McBride, L., Meister, S., Kronick, M.: A high-resolution, fluorescence-based, semiautomated method for DNA fingerprinting. Genomics 4: 129–136, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, A., Sulston, J., Brenner, S., and Karn, J.: Towards a physical map for the genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 7821–7825, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewens, W.J., Bell, C.J., Donnelly, P.J., Dunn, P., Matallana, E., Ecker, J.R.: Genome mapping with anchored clones: theoretical aspects. Genomics 11: 799–805, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E.D. and Olson, M.V.: Systematic screening of yeast artificial-chromosome libraries using the polymerase chain reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 1213–1217, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohara, Y., Akiyama, K., and Isono, K.: The physical map of the whole E. coli chromosome: application of a new strategy for rapid analysis and sorting of a large genomic library. Cell 50: 495–580, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander, E.S. and Waterman, W.S.: Genomic mapping by fingerprinting random clones: a mathematical analysis. Genomics 2: 231–239, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, T.G., Chang, W.I., and Salit, J.: Computer methods for contig assembly and minimal path determination for contigs generated by SCL content analysis. In preparation.

  • Olson, M.V., Dutchik, J.E., Graham, M.Y., Brodeur, G.M., Helms, C., Frank, M., Maccollin, M., Scheinman, R., and Frank, T.: Random-clone strategy for genomic restriction mapping in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 7826–7830, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M.V., Hood, L., Cantor, C., and Botstein, D.: A common language for physical mapping of the human genome. Science 245: 1434–1435, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzolo, M.J., Sawyer, S.A., Martin, C.H., Smoller, D.A., and Hartl, D.L.: Optimized strategies for sequence-tagged-site selection in genome mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 8034–8038, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, R.L., Torney, D.C., Hildebrand, C.E., Longmire, J.L., Deaven, L.L., Jett, J.H., Doggett, N.A., and Moyzis, R.K.: Physical mapping of human chromosomes by repetitive sequence fingerprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 6218–6222, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney, D.C.: Mapping using unique sequences. J Mol Biol 217: 001–006, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X.: Technical report on some average character of quantities in the genomic mapping by anchoring method. State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, N.Y., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M.Q. and Marr, T.G.: Accelerated genome mapping with anchored clones: a discrete theoretical analysis. In preparation.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marr, T.G., Yan, X. & Yu, Q. Genomic mapping by single copy landmark detection: a predictive model with a discrete mathematical approach. Mammalian Genome 3, 644–649 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352482

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352482

Keywords

Navigation