Marine Biology

, Volume 124, Issue 4, pp 551–560 | Cite as

Identification of archaeogastropod larvae from a hydrothermal vent community

  • L. S. Mullineaux
  • S. L. Kim
  • A. Pooley
  • R. A. Lutz
Article

Abstract

Dispersal is essential in order that endemic species living in ephemeral, patchy vent environments may persist over evolutionary time. Quantitative field studies of larval dispersal, however, require specieslevel identification of the larval forms because each individual must be distinguished from related vent species, and from non-vent species living in the surrounding deep-sea environment. Methods for culturing these larvae to an identifiable stage have not yet been developed. To solve the larval identification problem for the archaeogastropod molluscs (a prominent component of vent communities), we used a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to image shells of larvae collected in the water column near vents along the East Pacific Rise (9°40′ to 9°50′N; 104°W). Larval shell size, shape and ornamentation were compared to protoconchs retained in juvenile or adult shells of identified species, and used to assign five larval groups unequivocally to species (Cyathermia naticoides Warén and Bouchet, 1989; Neomphalus fretterae McLean, 1981; Clypeosectus delectus McLean, 1989; Rhynchopelta concentrica McLean, 1989; and Lirapex granularis Warén and Bouchet, 1989) and seven groups tentatively to species or genus [Lepetodrilus spp. (three groups); Gorgoleptis sp; Peltospira ?operculata McLean, 1989; and ?Melanodrymia sp. (two groups)].

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berg CJ, Van Dover CL (1987) Benthopelagic macrozooplankton communities at and near deep-sea hydrothermal vents in the eastern Pacific Ocean and the Gulf of California. Deep-Sea Res 43: 379–401Google Scholar
  2. Coffroth MA, Mulawka JM III (1995) Identification of marine invertebrate larvae by means of PCR-RAPD species-specific markers. Limnol Oceanogr 40: 181–189Google Scholar
  3. Gustafson RG, Littlewood DTJ, Lutz RA (1991) Gastropod egg capsules and their contents from deep-sea hydrothermal vent environments. Biol Bull mar biol lab, Woods Hole 180: 34–55Google Scholar
  4. Gustafson RG, Lutz RA (1994) Molluscan life history traits at deep-sea hydrothermal vents and cold methane/sulfide seeps. In: Young CM, Eckelbarger KJ (eds) Reproduction, larval biology and recruitment of the deep-sea benthos. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 76–97Google Scholar
  5. Haymon RM, Fornari DJ, Von Damm KL, Lilley MD, Perfit MR, Edmond JM, Shanks III WC, Lutz RA, Grebmeier JM, Carbotte S, Wright D, McLaughlin E, Smith M, Beedle N, Olson E (1993) Volcanic eruption of the mid-ocean ridge along the East Pacific Rise crest at 9°45–52′N: direct submersible observations of seafloor phenomena associated with an eruption event in April, 1991. Earth planet Sci Lett 119: 85–101Google Scholar
  6. Hessler RR, Smithey WM, Boudrias MA, Keller CH, Lutz RA, Childress JJ (1988) Temporal change in megafauna at the Rose Garden hydrothermal vent (Galápagos Rift; eastern tropical Pacific). Deep-Sea Res 35: 1681–1709Google Scholar
  7. Jablonski D, Lutz RA (1983) Larval ecology of marine benthic invertebrates: paleobiological implications. Biol Rev 58: 21–89Google Scholar
  8. Kim SL, Mullineaux LS, Helfrich KR (1994) Larval dispersal via entrainment into hydrothermal vent plumes. J geophys Res 99: 12655–12665Google Scholar
  9. Lutz RA, Bouchet P, Jablonski D, Turner RD, Warén A (1986) Larval ecology of molluscs at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Am malac Bull 4: 49–54Google Scholar
  10. Lutz RA, Shank TM, Fornari DJ, Haymon RM, Lilley MD, Von Damm K, Désbruyeres D (1994) Rapid growth at deep-sea vents. Nature, Lond 371: 663–664Google Scholar
  11. Macdonald KC (1982) Mid-ocean ridges: fine scale tectonic, volcanic and hydrothermal processes within the plate boundary zone. A Rev Earth planet Sciences 10: 155–190Google Scholar
  12. McLean JH (1981) The Galapagos Rift limpet Neomphalus: relevance to understanding the evolution of a major Paleozoic-Mesozoic radiation. Malacologia 21: 291–336Google Scholar
  13. McLean JH (1988) New archaeogastropod limpets from hydrothermal vents. Superfamily Lepetodrilacea. Part 1. Systematic descriptions. Phil Trans R Soc (Ser B) 319: 1–32Google Scholar
  14. McLean JH (1989a) New slit limpets (Scissurellacea and Fissurellacea) from hydrothermal vents. Part 1. Systematic descriptions and comparisons based on shell and radular characteristics. Contr Sci 407: 1–29Google Scholar
  15. McLean JH (1989b) New archaeogastropod limpets from hydrothermal vents: new family Peltospiridae, new superfamily Peltospiracea. Zoologica Scr 18: 49–66Google Scholar
  16. McLean JH (1990) Neolepetopsidae, a new docoglossate limpet family from hydrothermal vents and its relevance to patellogastropod evolution. J Zool, Lond 222: 485–528Google Scholar
  17. McLean JH (1993) New species and records of Lepetodrilus (Vetigastropoda: Lepetodrilidae) in the hydrothermal vent habitat. Veliger 36: 27–35Google Scholar
  18. Mullineaux LS, Wiebe PH, Baker ET (1995) Larvae of benthic invertebrates in hydrothermal vent plumes over Juan de Fuca Ridge. Mar Biol 122: 585–596Google Scholar
  19. Okutani T, Fujikura K, Sasaki T (1993) New taxa and new distribution records of deepsea gastropods collected from or near the chemosynthetic communities in the Japanese waters. Bull natn Sci Mus, Tokyo (Ser A) 19: 123–143Google Scholar
  20. Olson RR, Runstadler JA, Kocher TD (1991) Whose larvae? Nature, Lond 351: 357–358Google Scholar
  21. Powell AWB (1942) The New Zealand Recent and fossil Mollusca of the family Turridae. Bull Auckland Inst Mus 2: 1–188Google Scholar
  22. Scheltema RS (1962) Pelagic larvae of New England intertidal gastropods. I. Nassarius obsoletus and Nassarius vibex. Trans Am microsc Soc 81: 1–11Google Scholar
  23. Tunnicliffe V (1991) The biology of hydrothermal vents: ecology and evolution. Oceanogr mar Biol A Rev 29: 319–407Google Scholar
  24. Turner RD, Lutz RA, Jablonski D (1985) Modes of molluscan larval development at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Bull biol Soc Wash 6: 167–184Google Scholar
  25. Van Aartsen JJ, Bogi C, Giusti F (1989) Remarks on genus Benthonella (Rissoidae) in Europe and the description of Laeviphitus (nov. gen) verduini (nov. spec.) (Epitoniidae). Conchiglie (Un malac ital, Milano). 21: 19–22Google Scholar
  26. Warén A, Bouchet P (1986) Four new species of Provanna Dall (Prosobranchia, Cerithiacea?) from East Pacific hydrothermal sites. Zoologica Ser 15: 157–164Google Scholar
  27. Warén A, Bouchet P (1989) New gastropods from East Pacific hydrothermal vents. Zoologica Scr 18: 67–102Google Scholar
  28. Warén A, Bouchet P (1993) New records, species, genera, and a new family of gastropods from hydrothermal vents and hydrocarbon seeps. Zoologica Scr 22: 1–90Google Scholar
  29. Warén A, Carrozza F, Rocchini R (1990) Elachisina versiliensis, a new Mediterranean species of the family Elachisinidae (Prosobranchia, Trucatelloidea). Boll Malac (Milano) 25: 335–339Google Scholar
  30. Warén A, Ponder WF (1991) New species, anatomy, and systematic position of the hydrothermal vent and hydrocarbon seep gastropod family Provannidae fam.n. (Caenogastropoda). Zoologica Scr 20: 27–56Google Scholar
  31. Wiebe PH, Copley N, Van Dover CL, Tamse A, Manrique F (1988) Deep-water zooplankton of the Guaymas Basin hydrothermal vent field. Deep-Sea Res 35: 985–1013Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. S. Mullineaux
    • 1
  • S. L. Kim
    • 1
  • A. Pooley
    • 2
  • R. A. Lutz
    • 2
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentWoods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Marine and Coastal SciencesRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations