Advertisement

Ecotoxicology

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 61–77 | Cite as

Ordination techniques for analysing response of biological communities to toxic stress in experimental ecosystems

  • René P. A. Van Wijngaarden
  • Paul J. Van Den Brink
  • Jan H. Oude Voshaar
  • Peter Leeuwangh
Paper

Abstract

The ordination techniques principal component analysis (PCA) and redundancy analysis (RDA) are considered to be useful tools for evaluating community responses in experimental ecotoxicology. Concepts and interpretation of these techniques are summarized. Application of PCA and RDA is illustrated in a case study. In this study, the effects of a single application of the insecticide Dursban® 4E (a.i. chlorpyrifos) on an aquatic macroinvertebrate community in microcosms were analysed. Four treatment (nominal chlorpyrifos concentration: 35 μg l-1) and four control microcosms were used. PCA visualized a change in species composition with time. Immediately after treatment, a major shift in species composition occurred in treated microcosms. RDA demonstrated that this shift was due to the treatment. RDA also showed that non-arthropods were generally insusceptible to chlorpyrifos; most arthropods were affected. Dynamics of separate taxa were visualized, giving indications of possible primary and secondary effects for these taxa. A Monte Carlo permutation test was used to decide whether treatment had a significant effect on the species composition and to investigate the state of recovery in time. In general, the RDA results gave an adequate condensation of detailed information on abundance and effects obtained by more conventional univariate statistical analysis for some individual taxa of the community. In combination with toxicity and ecological data, ordination techniques can provide insight into effects of toxic substances in complex biological communities.

Keywords

chlorpyrifos ordination macroinvertebrates microcosms Monte Carlo permutation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brock, T.C.M., Crum, S.J.H., Van Wijngaarden, R., Budde, B.J., Tijink, J., Zupelli, A. and Leeuwangh, P. (1992a) Fate and effects of the insecticide Dursban® 4E in indoor Elodea-dominated and macrophyte-free freshwater model ecosystems. I. Fate and primary effects of the active ingredient chlorpyrifos. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 23, 69–84.Google Scholar
  2. Brock, T.C.M., Van den Bogaert, M., Bos, A.R., Van Breukelen, S.W.F., Reiche, R., Terwoert, J., Suykerbuyk, R.E.M. and Roijackers, R.M.M. (1992b) Fate and effects of the insecticide Dursban® 4E in indoor Elodea-dominated and macrophyte-free freshwater model ecosystems. II. Secondary effects on community structure. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 23, 391–409.Google Scholar
  3. Gauch, H.G. (1982) Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Gittins, R. (1985) Canonical Analysis. A Review with Applications in Ecology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Hill, M.O. and Gauch, H.G., Jr (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42, 47–58.Google Scholar
  6. Jongman, R.G.H., Ter Braak, C.J.F. and Van Tongeren, O.F.R. (eds) (1987) Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
  7. Leeuwangh, P. (1994) Comparison of chlorpyrifos fate and effects in outdoor micro- and micro-cosms of various scale and construction. In Hill, I.A., Heimbach, F., Leeuwangh, P. and Matthiesen, P. eds. Freshwater Field Tests for Hazard Assessment of Chemicals, pp. 217–48. Michigan: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Ludwig, J.A. and Reynolds, J.F. (1988) Statistical Ecology: A Primer on Methods and Computing. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  9. Marshall, W.K. and Roberts, J.R. (1978) Ecotoxicology of Chlorpyrifos. Ottawa: National Research Council.Google Scholar
  10. Nelson, J.H. and Evans, E.S. (1973) Field Evaluations of the Larvicidal Effectiveness. Effects on Non-target Species and Environmental Residues of a Slow-release Polymer Formulation of Chlorpyrifos. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Environmental Hygiene Agency.Google Scholar
  11. Odenkirchen, E.W. and Eisler, R. (1988) Chlorpyrifos Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates: A Synoptic Review. Laurel: US Fish. Wildl. Serv. Biol.Google Scholar
  12. Siefert, R.E., Brazner, J.C., Lozano, S.J., Knuth, M.L., Heinis, L.J., Jensen, D.A., Sargent, K.W., O'Halloran, S.L., Bertelsen, S.L., Tanner, D.K. and Kline, E.R. (1987) The Effects of Chlorpyrifos on a Natural Aquatic System: A Research Design for Littoral Enclosure Studies and Preliminary Data Report, Duluth, MN: US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
  13. Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1987a) Unimodal models to relate species to environment. Thesis, GLW-Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  14. Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1987b) Ordination. In Jongman, R.G.H., Ter Braak, C.J.F. and Van Tongeren, O.F.R. eds. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology, pp. 91–173. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
  15. Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1988) CANOCO—A FORTRAN Program for Canocical Community Ordination by [Partial] [Detrended] [Canocical] Correspondence Analysis, Principal Components Analysis and Redundancy Analysis (Version 2.1). Wageningen: Technical Report, LWA-88-02, GLW-Agricultural Mathemathics Group.Google Scholar
  16. Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1990) Update Notes: CANOCO Version 3.10. Wageningen: GLW-Agricultural Mathemathics Group.Google Scholar
  17. Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1994) Canonical community ordination. Part 1: Basic theory and linear methods. Ecoscience, 1 (2).Google Scholar
  18. Ter Braak, C.J.F. and Prentice, I.C. (1988) A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18, 271–317.Google Scholar
  19. Van Breukelen, S.W.F. and Brock, T.C.M. (1993) Response of a macroinvertebrate community to insecticide application in replicated freshwater microcosms with emphasis on the use of principal component analysis. Sci. Total Environ. Suppl. part 2, 1047–58.Google Scholar
  20. Van Wijngaarden, R., Leeuwangh, P., Lucassen, W.G.H., Romijn, K., Ronday, R., Van der Velde, R. and Willigenburg, W. (1993) Acute toxicity of chlorpyrifos to fish, a newt, and aquatic invertebrates. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 51, 716–23.Google Scholar
  21. Verdonschot, P. and Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1994) An experimental manipulation of oligochaete communities in mesocosms treated with chlorpyrifos or nutrient additions: multivariate analysis with Monte Carlo permutation tests. Hydrobiologia, 278, 251–66.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • René P. A. Van Wijngaarden
    • 1
  • Paul J. Van Den Brink
    • 1
  • Jan H. Oude Voshaar
    • 2
  • Peter Leeuwangh
    • 1
  1. 1.DLO Winand Staring Centre for Integrated Land, Soil and Water Research (SC-DLO)WageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.DLO Agricultural Mathematical Group (GLW-DLO)WageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations