Abstract
A lucency traversing obliquely across the inferior-posterior aspect of cervical vertebral bodies may be a normal variant due to osteophytes of the uncinate processes or transverse processes with a resultant Mach band phenomenon. This could be misinterpreted as a fracture of the vertebral body in a patient with a history of cervical injury. A review of normal lateral cervical vertebral films obtained on patients with no traumatic history showed this phenomenon to occur in 27% of adults. It was not observed in children. The proper interpretation is easily made when one considers the location and the fact that a cervical fracture does not occur in such a location as an isolated event.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Daffner RH (1977) Pseudofracture of the dens: Mach bands. AJR 128:607
Daffner RH, Gehweiler JA Jr (1981) Pseudovacuum of the cervical intervertebral disc: a normal variant. AJR 137:737
Daffner RH (1983) Visual illusions affecting perception of the roentgen image. CRC Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 20:79
Daffner RH, Deeb ZL, Rothfus WE (1985) “Fingerprints” of vertebral trauma—a unifying concept based on mechanisms. Presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society, April 21–26, 1985, Boston, Massachusetts, [submitted for publication]
Gehweiler JA Jr, Osborne RL, Becker RF (1980) Radiology of vertebral trauma. Saunders, Philadelphia
Goldberg RP, Vine HS, Sacks BA, Ellison HP (1982) The cervical split: a pseudofracture. Skeletal Radiol 7:267
Kattan KR (1975) Trauma and no trauma of the cervical trauma. Thomas, Springfield
Kattan KR (1979) Two features of the atlas vertebrae simulating fractures by tomography. AJR 132:963
Miller MD, Gehweiler JA Jr, Martinez S, Charlton OP, Daffner RH (1978) Significant new observations on cervical spine trauma. AJR 130:659
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Daffner, R.H., Deeb, Z.L. & Rothfus, W.E. Pseudofractures of the cervical vertebral body. Skeletal Radiol 15, 295–298 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349818
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349818