Skip to main content
Log in

Size and survival in a stochastic environment

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Spatial and temporal variability in environmental conditions can significantly influence fluctuations in body size if the environmental heterogeneity gives rise to variable size dependent mortality rates, or dispersal between sites incurs a reproductive cost. Temporal variability has a greater effect than spatial variability. These conclusions are derived from a model based on the assumption that the innate capacity for increase, r m , is a suitable fitness measure. The limitations of this model are discussed and an alternative approach using the parent-offspring regression presented. It is suggested that models based upon the latter approach are more appropriate for investigations of the evolution of traits (showing continuous variation) in variable environments because it does not require the assumption that some fitness measure is being optimized and because it may give more insight into the rates of change of the character.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Falconer, D.S.: Introduction to quantitative genetics. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd 1960

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambysellis, M.P., Heed, W.B.: Studies of oogenesis in natural populations of Drosophilidae. 1. Relation of ovarion development and ecological habitats of the Hawaiian species. Am. Nat. 105, 31–49 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C., Cohen, D.: On population growth in a randomly varying environment. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 62, 1056–1060 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M.: Stability in model ecosystems. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 6, 18–56 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarquar, A.M., Robertson, F.W.: The lack of evidence for co-adaptation in crosses between geographical races of Drosophila subobscura. Gen. Re. Camb. 4, 104–131 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R.F.: Observed and simulated changes in genetic quality in natural populations of Hyphantria cunea. Can. Ent. 103, 893–906 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, E.C.R., Robertson, F.W.: Studies in quantitative inheritance 11. Analysis of strains of Drosophila melanogaster selected for long wing. J. Gen. 51, 276–316 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff, D.A.: The analysis of a population model demonstrating the importance of dispersal in a heterogeneous environment. Oecologia (Berl.) 15, 259–275 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff, D.A.: Population stability and the evolution of dispersal in a heterogeneous environment. Oecologia (Berl.) 19, 217–237 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff, D.A.: Dispersal in dipterans; its costs and consequences. J. Anim. Ecol. 46, 443–456 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff, D.A.: On the problem of demonstrating ‘r-selection’. To be published

  • Tantawy, A.O.: Studies on natural populations of Drosophila 111. Morphological and genetic differences of wing length in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans in relation to season. Evolution 18, 560–570 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roff, D.A. Size and survival in a stochastic environment. Oecologia 36, 163–172 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349806

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349806

Keywords

Navigation