Abstract
Standing stock and size composition of the zooplankton comunity (>100 μm) were studied in four depth strata of the upper 200 m of the water column during a “Meteor” cruise to the central Red Sea and Gulf of Aden in spring 1987. The central Red Sea was divided into a northern area of higher salinity and a less saline southern part. Both areas exhibited significant differences in zooplankton abundance and standing stock. The latter increased by the ratio 1:2:3 from the northern central Red Sea to its southern part and further south to the Gulf of Aden. For size structure analysis samples were fractionated into three size classes (100 to 300, 300 to 500, 500 to 5000 μm). In the central Red Sea the smallest size was dominant whereas in the Gulf of Aden the largest size fraction played a greater relative role than in the central Red Sea. This shift in size structure of the zooplankton community from the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden is apparently primarily related to ecosystem difference between both areas, leading to a change in species composition. In addition, size reduction of individual species common to both seas may be of some significance in the extreme environment of the Red Sea.
References
Beckmann W (1984) Mesozooplankton distribution on a transect from the Gulf of Aden to the central Red Sea during the winter monsoon. Oceanol Acta 7:87–102
Böttger R (1987) The vertical distribution of micro- and small mesozooplankton in the central Red Sea. Biol Oceanogr (NY) 4: 383–402
Böttger-Schnack R (1989) Body length of female Macrosetella gracilis (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) from various depth zones in the Red Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 52:33–37
Böttger-Schnack R, Schnack D, Weikert H (1989) Biological observations on small cyclopoid copepods in the Red Sea. J Plankton Res 11:1089–1101
Edwards FJ (1987) Climate and oceanography. In: Edwards AJ, Head SM (eds) Red Sea. Key environmental Series. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 45–69
Giesbrecht W, Schmeil O (1898) Copepoda. I. Gymnoplea. In: Schulze FE (ed) Das Tierreich, 6. Lieferung. Friedländer & Sohn, Berlin, pp 1–169
Giguère LA, St.-Pierre JF, Bernier B, Vézina A, Rondeau J-G (1989) Can we estimate the true weight of zooplankton samples after chemical preservation. Can J Fish aquat Sciences 46:522–527
Gordeyeva KT (1970) Quantitative distribution of zooplankton in the Red Sea. Oceanology, Wash 10:867–871
Halim Y (1969) Plankton of the Red Sea. Oceanogr mar Biol A Rev 7:231–275
Halim Y (1984) Plankton of the Red Sea and the Arabian Gulf. Deep-Sea Res 31A:969–982
Kasturirangan LR (1963) A key for the indentification of the more common planktonic copepoda of Indian coastal waters. Indian National Committee on Oceanographic Research, Publ. No. 2. Council of Scientific & Industrial Research, New Delhi
Khimitsa VA, Bibik VA (1979) Seasonal exchange in dissolved oxygen and phosphate between the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. Oceanology, Wash 19:544–546
Khmeleva NN (1967) Role of radiolarians in the estimation of primary production in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 172:1430–1433 (in Russian)
Khmeleva NN (1970) On the primary production in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. Biol Morya, Kiev 21:107–133 (in Russian)
Kinne O (1971) Salinity-invertebrates. In: Kinne O (ed) Marine ecology, Vol. 1. Environmental factors, Part 2. John Wiley & Sons, London, pp 820–994
Krey J (1973a) Das Plankton. In: Magaard L, Rheinheimer G (eds) Meereskunde der Ostsee. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 103–130
Krey J (1973b). Primary productivity in the Indian Ocean I. In: Zeitzschel B (ed) The biology of the Indian Ocean. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 115–128
Lenz J, Schneider G, El Hag AGD, Gradinger R, Fritsche P, Moigis A, Pillen T, Rolke M, Weisse T (1988) Planktological data from the central Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. Ber Inst Meereskde Kiel 180:1–200
Maillard C, Soliman G (1986) Hydrography of the Red Sea and exchanges with the Indian Ocean in summer. Oceanol Acta 9: 249–269
Margalef R (1978) Life-forms of phytoplankton as survival strategies in an unstable environment. Oceanol Acta 1:493–509
Morcos SA (1970) Physical and chemical oceanography of the Red Sea. Oceanogr Mar Biol A Rev 8:73–202
Osman MM (1985) Water exchange between the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. Int Symp Upw W Afr Inst Inv Pesq Barcelona 1: 205–212
Petzold M (1986) Untersuchungen zur Horizontal- und Vertikalverteilung des Phytoplanktons im Roten Meer. Diploma thesis, University of Hamburg
Quadfasel D, Baudner H (1993) Gyre-scale circulation cells in the Red Sea. Oceanol Acta 16:221–229
Rao TSS (1973) Zooplankton studies in the Indian Ocean. In: Zeitzschel B (ed) The biology of the Indian Ocean. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 243–255
Ryther JH, Hall JR, Pease AK, Bakun A, Jones MM (1966) Primary organic production in relation to chemistry and hydrography of the western Indian Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 11:371–380
Schneider G, Lenz J (1991) Zooplankton community metabolism in the upper 200 m of the central Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 77:301–306
Timonin A G (1971) The structure of plankton communities of the Indian Ocean. Mar Biol 9:281–289
Verch N, Petzold M, Mahnke P, Quadfasel D (1989) Hydrographic bottle data obtained in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden during R.V. “Meteor” cruise 5-Mindik 1987. Institute of Oceanography, University of Hamburg, Tech Rep, pp 2–89
Weikert H (1987) Plankton and the pelagic environment. In: Edwards A, Head SM (eds) Red Sea. Key Environmental Series. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 90–111
Weikert H (1988) New information on the productivity of the deep Eastern Mediterranean and Red Seas. Rapp Commn int Mer Méditer 31:305
Weikert H, John H-Ch (1981) Experimences with a modified Bé multiple opening-closing plankton net. J Plankton Res 3:167–176
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by O. Kinne, Oldendorf/Luhe
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schneider, G., Lenz, J. & Rolke, M. Zooplankton standing stock and community size structure within the epipelagic zone: a comparison between the central Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. Marine Biology 119, 191–198 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349556
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349556