Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of nectar production on neighborhood size

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Bumblebee foraging behavior was observed on two plant species with similar floral and inflorescence structures. One species produces nectar while the other does not. Bees, upon visiting nectar producing flowers tend to empty them of nectar and by frequently moving between close neighbors, create a patchily distributed resource base. Bees maximize their foraging efficiency in such an environment by using an area-restricted searching behavior and flying distances inversely correlated with the quality of reward received. Pollen collecting bumblebees do not create a patchy environment and maximize their foraging efficiency by more consistently moving shorter distances. Pollen collecting bumblebees are significantly more likely to revisit flowers and to visit more flowers per inflorescence than are nectar gathering bumblebees. These differences in foraging behavior increase the neighborhood size for nectar producing species and make it increasingly unlikely that random drift will be a dominant mode of evolution in populations of these species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beattie AJ, Culver DC (1979) Neighborhood size in Viola. Evolution 33:1226–1229

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1977) Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerster HW, Levin DA (1968) Neighborhood size in Lithospermum caroliniense. Genetics 60:577–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, Kerster HW (1969a) Density-dependent gene dispersal in Liatris. Amer Natur 103:61–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, Kerster HW (1969b) The dependence of bee-mediated pollen dispersal on plant density. Evolution 23:560–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollason JG (1980) Learning to forage — optimally? Theoret Pop Biol 18:44–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleasants JM (1977) Competition in plant-pollinator systems: An analysis of meadow communities in the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Ph D Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleasants JM (1980) Competition for bumblebee pollinators in Rocky Mountain plant communities. Ecology 61:1446–1459

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleasants JM, Zimmerman M (1979) Patchiness in the dispersion of nectar resources: evidence for hot and cold spots. Oecologia (Berl) 41:283–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen MH (1973) The frequency and foraging behavior of honeybees and bumblebees on field beans in Denmark. J Apicult Res 12:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1978) Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences. Theoret Pop Biol 13:72–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1979) Optimal foraging in bumblebees: rules of movement between flowers within inflorescences. Anim Behav 27:1167–1181

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1981) Optimal foraging in nectar-feeding animals and coevolution with their plants. In: AC Kamil, Sargent TD (eds), Foraging Behavior. Garland Press

  • Schaal BA (1980) Measurement of gene flow in Lupinus texensis. Nature 284:450–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaal BA, Leverich WJ (1980) Pollination and banner markings in Lupinus texensis (Leguminosae). Southwestern Natur 25:280–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J (1980) Pollinator foraging behavior and gene dispersal in Senecio (Compositae). Evolution 34:934–943

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD, Plowright RC (1980) Pollen carryover, nectar rewards, and pollinator behavior with special reference to Diervilla lonicera. Oecologia (Berl) 46:68–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1946) Isolation by distance under diverse systems of mating. Genetics 31:39–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1969) Evolution and the Genetics of Populations Vol II The Theory of Gene Frequencies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M (1979a) An analysis of the reproductive strategies of Polemonium in Colorado. Ph D Thesis, Washington University, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M (1979b) Optimal foraging: a case for random movement. Oecologia (Berl) 43:261–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M (1981a) Nectar dispersion patterns in a population of Impatiens capensis. Virginia J Science: In Press

  • Zimmerman M (1981b) Optimal foraging, plant density and the marginal value theorem. Oecologia (Berl) 49:148–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M (1981c) Patchiness in the dispersion of nectar resources: probable causes. Oecologia (Berl) 49:154–157

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimmerman, M. The effect of nectar production on neighborhood size. Oecologia 52, 104–108 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349017

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349017

Keywords

Navigation