Summary
Sixteen patients having infarction caused by circulatory disturbance at the top of the basilar artery, that is to say, the “top of the basilar” syndrome, were studied, the diagnosis having been made by computerized tomography. Infarcts were widely distributed in each patient between the thalamus, midbrain, pons, cerebellum, and occipital lobe. Both thalami were involved in 7 cases. When the thalamus was involved bilaterally, the low density areas were symmetrical in size and localization. Angiography revealed that stenosis or occlusion lay within a circle 2 cm in diameter surrounding the five-forked junction at the top of the basilar artery in 84.6%. Recanalization of the occluded artery occurred in 61.5%, suggesting that embolism played an important role in appearance of this syndrome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Caplan LR (1980) “Top of the basilar” syndrome. Neurology (NY) 30:72–79
Castaigue P, Lhermitte F, Buge A, Escourolle R, Hauw JJ, Lyon-Caen O (1980) Paramedian thalamic and midbrain infarcts. Clinical and neuropathological study. Ann Neurol 10:127–148
Segarra JM (1970) Cerebral vascular disease and behavior. Arch Neurol 22:408–418
Greitz T, Lofsteddt S (1954) The relationship between the third ventricle and the basilar artery. Acta Radiol 42:85–100
Jennett B, Bond M (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1:480–484
Cerebral embolism study group (1983) Immediate anticoagulation of embolic stroke. A randomized trial. Stroke 14:668–676
Shah PM, Aiyar RR (1965) Arteriographic study of cerebral embolism. Lancet 2:358–361
Fisher CM (1982) Lacunar strokes and infarct: A review. Neurology (NY) 32:871–876
Percheron G (1973) The anatomy of the arterial supply of the human thalamus and its use for the interpretation of the thalamic vascular pathology. Z Neurol 205:1–13
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sato, M., Tanaka, S. & Kohama, A. “Top of the basilar” syndrome: Clinico-radiological evaluation. Neuroradiology 29, 354–359 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00348914
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00348914