Skip to main content
Log in

Numbers and biomass of centipedes (Lithobiomorpha: Chilopoda) in a Betula-Alnus woodland in N.E. England

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Over a period of 1 year the mean monthly population densities of L. forficatus varied between 7.58 m-2 (February) and 24.07 m-2 (October). The equivalent values for L. crassipes were 17.05 m-2 (February) and 64.17 m-2 (October). The annual mean population density of the two species was estimated at 51 m-2 with a biomass of 0.585 g live wt m-2. Less than 4% of the total lithobiid population was found in decaying logs and tree stumps, most of the population inhabited the soil/litter layers.

Seasonal fluctuation in numbers was shown to be unimodal in L. forficatus and bimodal in L. crassipes. A similar pattern was noted in the status of the ovaries, L. forficatus appears to have a single peak breeding period (September) while L. crassipes has two (June and September).

In terms of biomass, the relative importance of centipedes among other woodland invertebrate predators is high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auerbach, S.I.: The centipedes of the Chicago area with special reference to their ecology. Ecol. Monogr. 21, 97–124 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogh, J., Loksa, I.: Arthropod cenosis of the litter stratum of an oak forest. Arch. biol. hung. Tihany; Ser. II, 18, 264–279 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blower, J.G.: Millipedes and centipedes as soil animals. In: Soil zoology (D.K. McE. Kevan, ed.), pp. 138–151. London: Butterworths 1955

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornebusch, C.H.: The fauna of forest soil. Forst. Forsøgsv. Danm. 11, 1–224 (1930)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowdy, W.W.: A community study of a disturbed deciduous forest area near Cleveland, Ohio, with special reference to invertebrates. Ecol. Monogr. 14, 193–222 (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  • Drift, J. van der: Analysis of the animal community of a beech forest floor. Tijdschr. Ent. 94, 1–168 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eason, E.H.: Centipedes of the British Isles, pp. 294. London: Warne 1964

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, T.H. Jr., Chandler, R.F.: The fauna of forest humus layers in New Xork. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exper. Sta. Mem., 247, 1–26 (1942)

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C.A., Reichle, D.E., Crossley, D.A., Jr.: The role of soil invertebrates in turnover of organic matter and nutrients. In: Analysis of temperate forest ecosystems (D.E. Reichle, ed.), pp. 147–172. London: Chapman & Hall 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C.S.: The pattern of animal communities, pp. 432. London: Methuen 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M.K.: Ground vegetation and forest litter production. In: Methods of study in soil ecology (J. Phillipson, ed.), Proc. IBP/UNESCO Symposium, pp. 145–150. Paris: Unesco 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M.K.: Ground vegetation biocontent and net production in a deciduous woodland. Oecologia (Berl.) 7, 127–135 (1971a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M.K.: Tree biocontent, net production and litter fall in a deciduous woodland. Oikos 22, 62–73 (1971b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitazawa, Y.: Community metabolism of soil invertebrates in forest ecosystems of Japan. In: Secondary productivity of terrestrial ecosystems (K. Petrusewicz, ed.), pp. 649–661. Warsaw: Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitazawa, Y.: Biological regionality of the soil fauna and its function in forest ecosystem types. In: Productivity of forest ecosystems (P. Duvigneaud, ed.), pp. 485–498. Paris: UNESCO 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen, A.: A comparison of methods for extracting soil arthropods. In: Soil zoology (D.K. McE. Kevan, ed.), pp. 315–332. London: Butterworths 1955

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen, A.: Control of humidity in three funnel-type extractors for soil arthropods. In: Progress in soil zoology (P.W. Murphy, ed.), pp. 158–168. London: Butterworths 1962

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen, A.: The contribution of the microfauna to total soil metabolism. In: Soil organisms (J. Doeksen, J. van der Drift, eds.), pp. 3–17. Amsterdam: North Holland 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovington, J.D.: Studies on the development of woodland conditions under different trees. II. The forest floor. J. Ecol. 42, 71–80 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearse, A.S.: Effects of burning over and raking off litter on certain soil animals in the Duke Forest. Am. Midl. Nat. 29, 406–424 (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, J.: A miniature bomb calorimeter for small biological smaples. Oikos 15, 130–139 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raw, F.: Arthropoda (except Acari and Collembola). In: Soil biology (A. Burges, F. Raw, eds.), pp. 323–362. London: Academic Press 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, H.: An ecological study of the arthropods of a mixed woodland with particular reference to the Lithobiidae. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southampton (1957)

  • Siegel, S.: Non-parametric statistics for behavioural sciences pp. 312. New York: McGraw-Hill 1956

    Google Scholar 

  • Starling, J.H.: Ecological studies of the pauropods of the Duke Forest. Ecol. Monogr. 14, 292–310 (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallwork, J.A.: Ecology of soil animals, pp. 283. London: McGraw Hill 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Wignarajah, S.: Energy dynamics of centipede populations (Lithobiomorpha—L. crassipes and L. forficatus in woodland ecosystems). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Durham (1968)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wignarajah, S., Phillipson, J. Numbers and biomass of centipedes (Lithobiomorpha: Chilopoda) in a Betula-Alnus woodland in N.E. England. Oecologia 31, 55–66 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00348708

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00348708

Keywords

Navigation