Skip to main content
Log in

Kepler's hypothesis vicaria

  • Published:
Archive for History of Exact Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aiton, Eric J. (1973): Infinitesimals and the area law. Internat. Kepler-Symposium, Weil der Stadt 1971, ed. F. Kraft, K. Meyer & B. Sticker. Hildesheim 1973, 285–305.

  • Aiton, Eric J. (1978): Kepler's path to the construction and rejection of his first oval orbit for Mars. Annals of Science 35 (1978), 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, Wilbur, & Hatch, Robert A.: Boulliau, Mercator, and Horrocks's “Venus in sole visa”: Three unpublished letters. J. History of Astronomy xiv (1983), 166–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babb, Stanley E.: Accuracy of planetary theories, particularly for Mars. Isis 68 (1977), 426–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bialas, Volker: Die Bedeutung des dritten Planetengesetzes für das Werk von Johannes Kepler. Philosophia Naturalis 13 (1971), 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulliau (Bullialdus), Ismael: Astronomiae Philolaicae fundamenta clarius explicata et asserta. Parisiis 1657.

  • Brahe, Tycho: Opera omnia. Ed. I. L. E. Dreyer, 15 vols., Copenhagen 1913–1929.

  • Brouwer, Dirk, & Clemence, Gerald M.: Methods of celestial mechanics. New York, London 1961.

  • Caspar, Max: Cf. Kepler.

  • Cassini, Jean Dominique (G. D.) (1669): Nouvelle manière géométrique et directe de trouver les apogées, les excentricités et les anomalies du mouvement des planètes. J. des Sçavans 1669, déc. 2.

  • Cassini, Jean Dominique (G. D.) (1684): Les élémens de l'astronomie vérifiéz. Paris 1684.

  • Clemence, G. M.: Cf. Brouwer.

  • Connaissance des temps, ou des mouvements célestes pour l'an ... Bureau des Longitudes, Paris 1953-.

  • Curtius, Albertus: Novum coeli systema. Dillingae 1626.

  • Delambre, Jean Baptiste Joseph: Histoire de l'astronomie moderne. 2 vols. Paris 1821, Johnson Repr. 1969.

  • Doppelmayr, G.: Cf. Streete.

  • Dreyer, I. L. E.: Cf. Brahe.

  • Explanatory supplement to the astronomical ephemeris and the American ephemeris and nautical almanac. London 1961.

  • Flamsteed, John: Letter written to the Publisher from Derby Nov. 16.1672. Philos. Trans. 7 (1672), 5118–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, Christianus: Cf. Kepler.

  • Gassendi, Petrus: Opera omnia. 6 vols. Lugduni 1658, Stuttgart 1964 (repr.).

  • Gaythorpe, S. B.: On Horrocks's treatment of the evection and the equation of the center. Monthly Notices of Roy. Astr. Soc. 85 (1925), 858–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gearhart, C. A.: Epicycles, eccentrics, and ellipses: The predictive capabilities of Copernican planetary models. Arch. Hist. Exact Sciences 32 (1985), 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, Owen (1964): The computer versus Kepler. American Scientist 52 (1964), 218–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, Owen (1973): Kepler's treatment of redundant observations or, the computer versus Kepler revisited. Internat. Kepler-Symposium, Weil der Stadt 1971, ed. F. Kraft, K. Meyer & B. Sticker, Hildesheim 1973, 307–314.

  • Gingerich, Owen: Johannes Kepler (1571–1630). To appear in “The General History of Astronomy”.

  • Hartner, Willy: Ptolemy and Ibn Yūnus on solar parallax. Arch. Intern. Hist. Sciences 30 (1980), 5–26. Oriens-Occidens II. Hildesheim 1984, 376–397.

  • Hatch, Robert A.: Cf. Applebaum.

  • Herigonus, Petrus: Cursus mathematicus. 6 vols. Paris 1634–37, 16442.

  • Herz, Norbert: Geschichte der Bahnbestimmung von Planeten und Kometen. Leipzig 1887, 1894.

  • Horrocks, Jeremiah (1662): Venus in sole visa. In Hevelius' “Mercurius in sole visus”. Gedani 1662, 111–145.

  • Horrocks, Jeremiah (1673): Op. posth. John Wallis (ed.), Londini 1673.

  • Kepler, Johannes: Astronomia nova. Pragae 1609, Ed. Max Caspar (GW III), München 1937.

  • Kepler, Johannes: Opera omnia. Ed. Ch. Frisch. 8 vols. Frankfurt-Erlangen 1858–1891, repr. 1971-.

  • Kepler, Johannes: Gesammelte Werke (GW). Ed. W. v. Dyck, M. Caspar, F. Hammer, M. List & V. Bialas. München 1937-, vols. 1–11, 13–19.

  • Kepler, Johannes: Neue Astronomie. Transl. by Max Caspar. München-Berlin 1929.

  • Koyré, Alexandre: La révolution astronomique, Copernic, Kepler, Borelli. Paris 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeyama, Y. (1971): Hypothesen zur Planetentheorie des 17. Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt/M., 1971.

  • Maeyama, Y. (1974): The historical development of solar theories in the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Vistas in Astronomy 16 (1974), 35–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeyama, Y. (1975): On the order of accuracy of Kepler's solar theory. Vistas in Astronomy 18 (1975), 769–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeyama, Y. (1988): The Keplerian and mean motions. A geometrical study. Arch. Hist. Exact Sciences 38 (1988), 365–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeyama, Y. (1989): A simple, accurate, geometrical approximation to the Keplerian motion. To appear in Hist. Math.

  • Mercator, Nicolaus (1664): Hypothesis nova. Londini 1664.

  • Mercator, Nicolaus (1670): Clarissimi Cassini methodus investigandi apogea, excentricitates et anomalias planetarum, breviter exposita et demonstrata. Philos. Transact. repr. Johnson 5 (1670), 1168–75, New York 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercator, Nicolaus (1676): Institutiones astronomicae. Londini 1676, Patavii 1685.

  • Riccioli, Giovanni Battista: Almagestum novum. Bononiae 1651.

  • Russell, J. L.: Kepler's laws of planetary motion: 1609–1666. The Brit. J. Hist. Science 2 (1964), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, Robert: An account of the astronomical discoveries of Kepler. London 1804, repr. Wisconsin 1963.

  • Stephenson, Bruce: Kepler's physical astronomy. New York-Berlin 1987.

  • Streete, Thomas: Astronomia Carolina. Londini 1661, Noribergae 1705 (Latin transl., G. Doppelmayr).

  • Thoren, Victor E.: Lord of Uraniborg. Cambridge Univ. Press, in press.

  • Tuckerman, Bryant: Planetary, lunar, and solar positions. 2 vols., Philadelphia 1962, 1964.

  • Ward, Seth: Astronomia geometrica. Oxonii 1656.

  • Wallis, John: Cf. Horrocks.

  • Whiteside, D. T. (1974.1): Keplerian planetary eggs, laid and unlaid, 1600–1605. J. Hist. Astr. 5 (1974), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, D. T. (1974.2): Mercator. Dict. Scient. Biogr. IX, 310–312.

  • Wilson, Curtis (1968): Kepler's derivation of the elliptical path. Isis 59 (1968), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Curtis (1969): The error in Kepler's acronychal data for Mars. Centaurus 13 (1969), 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Curtis (1970): From Kepler's laws, so-called, to universal gravitation: Empirical factors. Arch. Hist. Ex. Sciences 6 (1970), 89–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Curtis (1987) On the origin of Horrocks's lunar theory. J. Hist. Astronomy 18 (1987), 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, Vincent: Astronomia Britannica. London 1669.

  • Zinner, Ernst: Geschichte und Bibliographie der astronomischen Literatur in Deutschland zur Zeit der Renaissance. Leipzig 1941.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by C. Wilson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maeyama, Y. Kepler's hypothesis vicaria. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 41, 53–92 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00348702

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00348702

Navigation