, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 85–99 | Cite as

Environmental control of the daily onset of luminescent activity in glowworms and fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)

  • Hans Dreisig


The daily onset of activity in fireflies and glowworms is a complicated process involving both a circadian rhythm and a triggering mechanism controlled by ambient illumination. Onset of the luminescent activity has been investigated in the field and under semi-natural and experimental conditions.
  1. 1.

    the onset of flashing or glowing occurs at a critical low illumination during or just after the twilight period. This was determined in the adult glowworm Lampyris noctiluca in Denmark and in the fireflies Photuris congener and Photinus umbratus in Florida.

  2. 2.

    The dispersion of activity onsets differs in the three species which is partly due to differences in duration of the decrease of illumination (duration of twilight). At the long duration of twilight in Denmark, L. noctiluca has a greater dispersion of onsets than has P. congener at the short twilight in Florida, although the period of activity onsets occurs during about the same range of illuminations.

  3. 3.

    The onset of activity occurs at a lower illumination at low than at high temperatures.

  4. 4.

    At a reduction in illumination to different low values an increasing number of animals does not commence activity above about 1 lux. There is no activity if the illumination remains above 10 lux.

  5. 5.

    A period of latency appears in the onset of luminescent activity by a sudden change in illumination from light to dark (dim light). The duration is about 11 min in L. noctiluca, 5 min in three species of Photuris and 3 1/2 min in P. umbratus. The latency is constant at different illuminations below the threshold for overt activity. The process underlying the latency also occurs at illuminations above the threshold, but it is slowed down the higher the illumination. Further, the latency is shorter at a fast decrease of illumination than at a slow.

  6. 6.

    It is suggested that onset of activity in nocturnal insects involves three steps. A circadian rhythm of sensitization brings the animal into a specific state of receptivity. This happens close to the normal time of activity onset. Further, a latency process controlled by illumination occurs before overt activity can take place. This is then released below a certain threshold level of illumination.



Circadian Rhythm Threshold Level Environmental Control Sudden Change Latency Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allard, H. A.: The photoperiodism of the firefly Photinus pyralis; its relation to the evening twilight and other conditions. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 33, 49–58 (1931)Google Scholar
  2. Aschoff, J.: Exogenous and endogenous components in circadian rhythms. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 25, 11–28 (1960)Google Scholar
  3. Aschoff, J.: Phasenlage der Tagesperiodik in Abhängigkeit von Jahreszeit und Breitengrad. Oecologia (Berl.) 3, 125–165 (1969)Google Scholar
  4. Buck, J. B.: Studies on the firefly. I. The effects of light and other agents on flashing in Photinus pyralis with special reference to periodicity and diurnal rhythm. Physiol. Zool. 10, 45–58 (1937)Google Scholar
  5. Dreisig, H.: Control of the glowing of Lampyris noctiluca in the field. J. Zool. 165, 229–244 (1971 a)Google Scholar
  6. Dreisig, H.: Diurnal activity in the Dusky cockroach, Ectobius lapponicus. Ent. Scand. 2, 132–138 (1971 b)Google Scholar
  7. Dreisig, H.: Observations on the luminescence of the larval glowworm, Lampyris noctiluca. Ent. Scand. 5, 103–109 (1974)Google Scholar
  8. Dreisig, H.: The diurnal rhythm of luminescent activity in glowworms and fireflies. In preparationGoogle Scholar
  9. Hess, W. N.: Notes on the biology of some common Lampyridae. Biol. Bull. 38, 39–76 (1920)Google Scholar
  10. Lamprecht, G., Weber, F.: Die Synchronisation der Laufperiodik von Carabus-Arten durch Zeitgeber unterschiedlicher Frequenz. Z. vergl. Physiol. 72, 226–259 (1971)Google Scholar
  11. Lloyd, J. E.: Studies on the flash communication system in Photinus fireflies. Misc. Publs. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 130, 1–96 (1966 a)Google Scholar
  12. Lloyd, J. E.: Signals and mating behavior in several fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Coleopts. Bull. 20, 84–90 (1966 b)Google Scholar
  13. Lloyd, J. E.: Flashes of Photuris fireflies: Their value and use in recognizing species. Florida Entom. 52, 29–35 (1969)Google Scholar
  14. Lloyd, J. E.: Bioluminescent communication in insects. Ann. Rew. Entomol. 16, 97–122 (1971)Google Scholar
  15. Lohmann, M.: Der Einfluß von Beleuchtungsstärke und Temperatu auf die tagesperiodische Laufaktivität des Mehlkäfers, Tenebrio molitor. Z. vergl. Physiol. 49, 341–389 (1964)Google Scholar
  16. McDermott, F. A.: Observations on the light emission of American Lampyridae: The photogenic function as a mating adaptation. Canad. Ent. 49, 53–61 (1917)Google Scholar
  17. Nielsen, E. T.: Illumination at twilight. Oikos 14, 9–21 (1963)Google Scholar
  18. Nielsen, E. T., Dreisig, H.: The behavior of stridulation in Orthoptera Ensifera. Behaviour 37, 205–252 (1970)Google Scholar
  19. Nielsen, E. T., Nielsen, H. T.: The swarming habits of some Danish mosquitoes. Ent. Medd. 32, 99–170 (1963)Google Scholar
  20. Nielsen, H. T., Nielsen, E. T.: Swarming of mosquitoes. Laboratory experiments under controlled conditions. Ent. exp. & appl. 5, 14–32 (1962)Google Scholar
  21. Papi, F.: Light emission, sex attraction and male flash dialogues in a firefly, Luciola lusitanica. Monitore Zool. Ital. 3, 135–184 (1969)Google Scholar
  22. Persson, B.: Influence of light on flight activity of Noctuids (Lepidoptera) in South Sweden. Ent. Scand. 2, 215–232 (1971)Google Scholar
  23. Schwalb, H. H.: Beiträge zur Biologie der einheimischen Lampyriden Lampyris noctiluca und Phausis splendidula und experimentelle Analyse ihres Beutefang- und Sexualverhaltens. Zool. Jb., Abt. System., Ökol. u. Geogr. 88, 399–550 (1961)Google Scholar
  24. Wever, R.: Zum Einfluß der Dämmerung auf die circadiane Periodik. Z. vergl. Physiol. 55, 255–277 (1967)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Dreisig
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoological LaboratoryUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen

Personalised recommendations