Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal foraging: The responses of Peromyscus leucopus to experimental changes in processing time and hunger

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Food density, degree of hunger prior to foraging, and food processing difficulty were varied in order to determine their effects on the diet diversity of captive Peromyscus leucopus foraging for buried seeds. No relationship was found between diet diversity and food density. However, diet diversity exhibited a significantly positive relationship with hunger, and a significantly negative relationship with seed processing time. These results strongly support optimal foraging theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: the attack strategy of a mantid. Am Nat 110:141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew LR, (1992) Some factors influencing the distribution of the prairie vole, forest deer mouse, and prairie deer mouse. Ecology 3:29–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Dice RM (1951) The water exchanges of some small mammals. Ecol Monogr 21:215–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebersole JP (1977) Experiments on optimal foraging in Peromyscus. In: Crowder L ed, Ecological Lab Experiences, An Ideas Forum. Michigan State University, Dept of Zoology, p 69–78

  • Emlen JM (1966) The role of time and energy in food preference Am Nat 100:611–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen JM (1968) Optimal choice in animals. Am Nat 102:385–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss-Custard JD (1977) Optimal foraging and the size selection of worms by redshank Tringa totanus. Anim Behav 25:10–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard WE (1951) Relation between low temperatures and available food to survival of small rodents. J Mammal 32:300–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber M (1975) The Fire of Life. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of pathy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1974) On the theory of optimal diets. Am Nat 108:59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1975) Diet optimization with nutrient constraints. Am Nat 109:765–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Quart Rev Biol 52:137–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman OJ (1977) Optimization of diets through food preference by heteromyid rodents. Ecology 58:454–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman OJ, Oberstein D (1977) Selection of seed distribution types by Dipodomys merriami and Perograthus amplus. Ecology 58:636–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1969) Optimal size and specialization in constant and fluctuating environments: an energy-time approach. Brookhaven Symp Biol 22:103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Sealander JA Jr (1952) Food consumption in Peromyscus in relation to air temperature and previous thermal experience. J Mammal 33:206–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE Hall DJ (1974) Optimal foraging and size selection of prey by bluegill sunfish (Lepomis machrochirus). Ecology 55:1042–1052

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ebersole, J.P., Wilson, J.C. Optimal foraging: The responses of Peromyscus leucopus to experimental changes in processing time and hunger. Oecologia 46, 80–85 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346970

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346970

Keywords

Navigation