Marine Biology

, Volume 117, Issue 1, pp 1–22 | Cite as

Highly directional swimming by scalloped hammerhead sharks, Sphyrna lewini, and subsurface irradiance, temperature, bathymetry, and geomagnetic field

  • A. P. Klimley
Article

Abstract

The homing behavior of scalloped hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna lewini) to and fro between Espiritu Santo Seamount and Las Animas Island and the surrounding pelagic environment was studied to reveal their mechanisms of navigation in the oceanic environment. Four sharks were tagged with ultrasonic transmitters and tracked at the former location and one shark at the latter site during July, August, or September between 1981 and 1988. Hammerhead swimming movements were highly oriented: the mean coefficient of concentration (r) for sets of ten consecutive swimming directions recorded during eight homing movements by three hammerhead sharks ranged from 0.885 to 0.996. Drift within a current could not explain this directionality, since highly variable directions were recorded from a transmitter floating at the sea surface after becoming detached from a shark. Forward swimming momentum was an unlikely explanation, since highly directional swimming was maintained for a period of 32 min with only a gradual change in course. To maintain directionality over this period, an environmental property should be necessary for guidance. The hammerheads swam at night, with repeated vertical excursions ranging from 100 to 450 m deep, out of view of either the sea surface or the sea floor. The sharks' vertical diving movements were compared to distributions of spectral irradiance (relative to elasmobranch scotopic and photopic visual sensitivities), temperature, and current-flow directions in the water column. No relationships were evident between these properties and the sharks' oriented swimming movements. Movements of scalloped hammerhead sharks to and from a seamount were compared to topographic features in bathymetry and geomagnetic field leading away from the seamount. Sharks swam repeatedly over fixed geographic paths, and these paths occurred less often along submarine ridges and valleys than maxima and minima in the geomagnetic field. No significant difference existed between the degree of association of points from the sharks' tracks and points from track simulations and ≥20° changes in the slope of the depth record. On the other hand, significantly more points from the sharks' tracks were associated with slope changes in the magnetic intensity record than points from track simulations. A magnetic intensity gradient of 0.037 nanoteslas/m (nT/m) existed at 175 m depth, where a shark swam directionally, and this gradient was three times steeper than that measured at the sea surface and exceeded that recorded at a depth of 200 m. The hammerheads are hypothesized to find the seamount using geomagnetic topotaxis. The shark could be attracted to and move back and forth along ridges and valleys, features in the relief of magnetic field intensities occurring over a geographical area.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Bovet, P., Benhamou, S. (1988). Spatial analysis of animals' movements using a correlated random walk model. J. theor. Biol. 131: 419–433Google Scholar
  2. Carey, F. G., Kanwisher, J. W., Brazier, O., gabrielson, G., Casey, J. G., Pratt, Jr., H. L. (1982). Temperature and activities of a white shark, Carcharodon carcharias. Copeia 1982: 254–260Google Scholar
  3. Carey, F. G., Robison, B. H. (1981). Daily patterns in the activities of swordfish, Xiphias gladius, observed by acoustic telemetry. Fish. Bull. U.S. 79: 277–292Google Scholar
  4. Carey, F. G., Scharold, J. V. (1990). Movements of blue sharks (Prionace glauca) in depth and course. Mar. Biol. 106: 329–342Google Scholar
  5. Cigas, J., Klimley, A. P. (1987). A microcomputer interface for decoding telemetry data and displaying them numerically and graphically in real time. Behav. Res. Meth., Instrums, Computers 19: 19–25Google Scholar
  6. Doving, K. B., Westerberg, H., Johnsen, P. B. (1985). Role of olfaction in the behavioral and neuronal responses of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, to hydrographic stratification. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sciences 42: 1658–1667Google Scholar
  7. Gove, P. B. (ed.) (1966). Webster's third new international dictionary of the English language. G & C Merriam Co., Spring-field, Mass.Google Scholar
  8. Greer Walker, M., Harden Jones, F. R., Arnold, G. P. (1978). The movements of plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) tracked in the open sea. J. Cons. int. Explor. Mer. 38: 58–86Google Scholar
  9. Gruber, S. H. (1967). A behavioral measurement of dark adaptation in the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris. In: Gilbert, P. W., Mathewson, R. F., Rall, D. P. (eds.) Sharks, skates and rays. Johns Hopkins Press, Balitmore, p. 479–490Google Scholar
  10. Gruber, S. H., Cohen, J. L. (1978). Visual system of the elasmobranchs: state of the art 1960–1975. In: Hodgson, E. S., Mathewson, R. F. (eds.) Sensory biology of sharks, skates and rays. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, p. 11–105Google Scholar
  11. Gruber, S. H., Nelson, D. R., Morrissey, J. F. (1988). Patterns of activity and space utilization of lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris, in a shallow Bahamian lagoon. Bull. mar. Sci. 43: 61–76Google Scholar
  12. Hansen, L. P., Doving, K. B., Jonsson, B. (1987). Migration of farmed adult Atlantic salmon with and without olfactory sense, released on the Norwegian coast. J. Fish Biol. 30: 713–721Google Scholar
  13. Harden Jones, F. R. (1981). Fish migration: strategy and tactics. In: Aidley, D. J. (ed.) Animal migration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 139–165Google Scholar
  14. Harden Jones, F. R., Arnold, G. P. (1982). Acoustic telemetry and the marine fisheries. In: Cheeseman, C. L., Mitson, R. B. (eds.) Telemetry studies of vertebrates. Academic Press, London, p. 75–93Google Scholar
  15. Hawryshyn, C. W., Arnold, M. G., Browning, E., Cole, R. C. (1990). Spatial orientation of rainbow trout to plane-polarized light: the ontogeny of E-vector discrimination and spectral sensitivity characteristics. J. comp. Physiol. (Sect. A) 166: 565–574Google Scholar
  16. Hawryshyn, C. W., McFarland, W. N. (1987). Cone photoreceptor mechanisms and the detection of polarized light in fish. J. comp. Physiol. (Sect. A) 160: 459–465Google Scholar
  17. Hiramatsu, K., Ishida, Y. (1989). Random movement and orientation in pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) migrations. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sciences 46: 1062–1066Google Scholar
  18. Holland, K., Brill, R. W., Chang, R. K. C. (1990a). Horizontal and vertical movements of Pacific blue marlin captured and released using sportfishing gear. Fish. Bull. U.S. 88: 397–402Google Scholar
  19. Holland, K., Brill, R. W., Chang, R. K. C. (1990b). Horizontal and vertical movements of yellowfin and bigeye tuna associated with fish aggregating devices. Fish. Bull. U.S. 88: 493–507Google Scholar
  20. Hurn, J. (1989). GPS. Trimble Navigation, Sunnyvale, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  21. Jamon, M. (1990). A reassessment of the random hypothesis in the ocean migration of Pacific salmon. J. theor. Biol. 143: 197–213Google Scholar
  22. Kalmijn, A. J. (1966). Electro-perception in sharks and rays. Nature, Lond. 212: 1232–1233Google Scholar
  23. Kalmijn, A. J. (1982). Electric and magnetic field detection in elasmobranch fishes. Science, N. Y. 318: 916–918Google Scholar
  24. Kalmijn, A. J. (1984). Theory of electromagnetic orientation: a further analysis. In: Bolis, L., Keynes, R. D., Maddrell, S. H. P. (eds.) Physiology of sensory systems. Cambridge University Press, London, p. 525–560Google Scholar
  25. Kirschvink, J. L., Dizon, A. E., Westphal, J. A. (1986). Evidence from strandings for geomagnetic sensitivity in cetaceans. J. exp. Biol. 120: 1–24Google Scholar
  26. Kirschvink, J. L., Gould, J. L. (1981). Biogenic magnetite as a basis for magnetic sensitivity in animals. Biosystems 13: 181–201Google Scholar
  27. Klimley, A. P. (1985). Schooling in Sphyrna lewini, a species with low risk of predation: a non-egalitarian state. Z. Tierpsychol. 70: 297–319Google Scholar
  28. Klimley, A. P. (1987). The determinants of sexual segregation in the scalloped hammerhead shark, Sphyrna lewini. Envir. Biol. Fish. 18: 27–40Google Scholar
  29. Klimley, A. P., Butler, S. B., Nelson, D. R., Stull, A. T. (1988). Diel movements of scalloped hammerhead sharks, Sphyrna lewini Griffith and Smith, to and from a seamount in the Gulf of California. J. Fish Biol. 33: 751–761Google Scholar
  30. Klimley, A. P., Cabrera-Mancilla, I., Castillo-Geniz, J. L. (1993). Horizontal and vertical movements of the scalloped hammerhead shark, Sphyrna lewini, in the Southern Gulf of California, Mexico. Ciencias mar. 19: 95–115Google Scholar
  31. Klimley, A. P., Nelson, D. R. (1984). Diel movement patterns of the scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini) in relation to El Bajo Espiritu Santo: a refuging central-position system. Behavl Ecol. Sociobiol. 15: 45–54Google Scholar
  32. Klinowska, M. (1985). Cetacean live stranding sites relate to geomagnetic topography. Aquat. Mammals 1: 27–32Google Scholar
  33. Klitgord, K. M., Behrendt, J. C. (1979). Basic structure of the U.S. Atlantic margin. Mem. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. 29: 85–112Google Scholar
  34. Landesman, J. G. (1984). Horizontal and vertical movements and seasonal population shifts in the blue shark, Prionace glauca, near Santa Catalina Island. thesis. California State University, Long Beach, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  35. Leask, M. J. M. (1977). A physiochemico mechanism for magnetic field detection by migratory birds and homing pigeons. Nature, Lond 267: 144–145Google Scholar
  36. Macdonald, K. C., Miller, S. P., Huestis, S. P., Spiess, F. N. (1980). Three-dimensional modeling of a magnetic reversal boundary from inversion of deep-tow measurements. J. geophys. Res. 85: 3670–3680Google Scholar
  37. Mann, S., Sparks, N. H., Walker, M. M., Kirschvink, J. L. (1988). Ultrastructure morphology and organization of biogenic magnetite from sockeye salmon, Onchorhynchus nerka: implications for magnetoreception. J. exp. Biol. 140: 35–49Google Scholar
  38. McFarland, W. N. (1991). Light in the sea: the optical world of elasmobranchs. J. exp. Zool. (Suppl.) 5: 3–12Google Scholar
  39. Merrill, R. T., McElhinny, M. W. (1983). The earth's magnetic field. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Mitson, R. B., Storeton West, T. J., Pearson, N. D. (1982). Trials of an acoustic transponding fish tag compass. Biotelemetry Patient Monitg 9: 69–79Google Scholar
  41. Northcutt, R. G. (1978). Brain organization in the cartilaginous fishes. In: Hodgson, E. H., Mathewson, R. F. (eds.) Sensory biology of sharks, skates, and rays. Government Printing Office, Washington D. C., p. 107–193Google Scholar
  42. O'Gower, A. K., Mathewson, R. F. (1967). Spectral sensitivity and flicker fusion frequency of the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris. In: Gilbert, P. W., Mathewson, R. F., Rall, D. P. (eds.) Sharks, skates and rays, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, p. 433–446Google Scholar
  43. Parker, R. L., Shure, L., Hildebrand, J. A. (1987). The application of inverse theory to seamount magnetism. Rev. Geophys. 25: 1–65Google Scholar
  44. Rohlf, F. J., Sokal, R. P. (1969). Statistical tables. W. H. Freeman & Company, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  45. Quinn, T. P., Groot, C. (1984). Pacific salmon (Onchorhynchus) migrations: orientation versus random movement. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sciences 41: 1319–1324Google Scholar
  46. Quinn, T. P., Terhune, B. A., Groot, C. (1989). Migratory orientation and vertical movements of homing adult sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka, in coastal waters. Anim. Behav. 37: 587–599Google Scholar
  47. Saila, S. B., Shappy, R. A. (1963). Random movement and orientation in salmon migration. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer 28: 155–166Google Scholar
  48. Skiles, D. D. (1985). The geomagnetic field: its nature, history, and biological relevance. In: Kirschvink, J. L., Jones, D. S., MacFadden, B. J. (eds.) Magnetite biomineralization and magnetoreception in organisms. Plenum Press, New York, p. 43–102Google Scholar
  49. Tesch, F. W. (1978). Horizontal and vertical swimming of eels during the spawning migration at the edge of the continental shelf. In: Schmidt-Koenig, K., Keeton, W. T. (eds.) Animal migration, navigation, and homing. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 378–391Google Scholar
  50. Walcott, C., Lednor, A. J. (1983). Bird navigation. In: Brush, A. H., Clark, Jr., G. A. (eds.) Perspectives in ornithology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 511–549Google Scholar
  51. Walker, M. M., Quinn, T. P., Kirschvink, J. L., Groot, C. (1988). Production of single-domain magnetite throughout life by sockeye salmon, Onchorhynchus nerka. J. exp. Biol. 140: 51–63Google Scholar
  52. Waterman, T. H., Forward, R. B. (1972). Field demonstration of polarotaxis in the fish Zenarchopterus. J. exp. Zool. 180: 33–54Google Scholar
  53. Wasterberg, H. (1982a). Ultrasonic tracking of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). I. Movements in coastal regions. Rep. Inst. Freshwat. Res. Drottningholm 60: 81–101Google Scholar
  54. Westerberg, H. (1982b). Ultrasonic tracking of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). II. Swimming depth and temperature stratification. Rep. Inst. Freshwat. Res. Drottningholm 60: 102–120Google Scholar
  55. Westerberg, H. (1984). The orientation of fish and the vertical stratification at fine- and micro-structure scales. In: MoCleave, J. D., Arnold, G. P., Dodson, J. J., Neill, W. H. (eds.) Mechanisms of in fishes. Plenum Press, New York, p. 179–203Google Scholar
  56. Winn, H. W., Salmon, M., Roberts, N. (1964). Sun-compass orientation by parrot fishes. Z. Tierpsychol 21: 798–812Google Scholar
  57. Zar, J. H. (1974). Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. P. Klimley
    • 1
  1. 1.Bodega Marine LaboratoryUniversity of California at DavisBodega BayUSA

Personalised recommendations