Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological differences and competitive interaction between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans in small laboratory populations

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In interspecific competition studies, some cases of apparent change in competitive ability have been reported. But the change in competitive outcome could equally well be due to character displacement. As a preliminary to studies of the effects of association of D. melanogaster (yellow white mutant strain) and D. simulans (vermilion mutant strain), the nature and extent of ecological differences between them, and the nature of their competitive interaction was studied. Differences between the strains were shown for oviposition site preferences, and for larval and pupal distribution. In pure species cultures, simulans showed a greater preference than melanogaster for oviposition in the center of the medium surface. In mixed populations, simulans had an increased preference for this oviposition site, where melanogaster was at low frequency. D. simulans larvae utilized the lower half of the medium to a significantly greater extent than did melanogaster. At low density (5 pairs of parents) in pure species cultures, 68.7% of simulans pupae were on the medium surface. As parental numbers increased, this proportion decreased. The distribution of melanogaster pupae was quite different, with only 8 to 12% on the medium at all densities. But the remaining pupae tended to occur higher on the cylinder wall as parental numbers increased. The competitive interaction changed during the developmental period. At four and eight days after culture initiation, simulans appeared superior, while for total adult progeny production, melanogaster was slightly superior. These strans of the two species were not ecologically equivalent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayala, F. J.: Reversal of dominance in competing species of Drosphila. Amer. Naturalist 100, 81–83 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Evolution of fitness. IV. Genetic evloution of interspecific competitive ability in Drosophila. Genetics 61, 373–747 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J. S. F.: An adaptation of the population bottle of Reed and Reed (1948). Drosophila Inf. Serv. 34, 113–114 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: The estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations. II. Experimental evaluation of factors affecting fitness. Evolution 17, 56–71 (1963a).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: The estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations. III. The fitness of certain strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 17, 138–146 (1963b).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Podger, R.N.: Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: Effects of larval density on viability, developmental period and adult body weight. Ecology 51, 170–189 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. L., Wilson, E. O.: Character displacement. Syst. Zool. 5, 49–64 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Claringbold, P. J., Barker, J. S. F.: The estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations. J. Theor. Biol. 1, 190–203 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D. J.: Variation in genetic response to interspecific competition in laboratory populations of Drosophila. Amer. Naturalist 104 239–252 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. A.: Competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. II. The improvement of competitive ability through selection. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 38, 813–817 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., Feinberg, E. H., Wood, P. W., Hayes, J. T.: Selection, spatial distribution, and the coexistence of competing fly species. Amer. Naturalist 99, 97–109 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sameoto, D. D., Miller, R. S.: Selection of pupation site by Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Ecology 49, 177–180 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., Ehrlich, P. R., Hunter, P. E., Schlarger, G.: Some factors affecting pupation site of Drosophila. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 53, 174–182 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wit, C. T. de: On competition. Versl. Landbouwk. Onder. Ned. 66, 1–82 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barker, J.S.F. Ecological differences and competitive interaction between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans in small laboratory populations. Oecologia 8, 139–156 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345810

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345810

Keywords

Navigation