Summary
In interspecific competition studies, some cases of apparent change in competitive ability have been reported. But the change in competitive outcome could equally well be due to character displacement. As a preliminary to studies of the effects of association of D. melanogaster (yellow white mutant strain) and D. simulans (vermilion mutant strain), the nature and extent of ecological differences between them, and the nature of their competitive interaction was studied. Differences between the strains were shown for oviposition site preferences, and for larval and pupal distribution. In pure species cultures, simulans showed a greater preference than melanogaster for oviposition in the center of the medium surface. In mixed populations, simulans had an increased preference for this oviposition site, where melanogaster was at low frequency. D. simulans larvae utilized the lower half of the medium to a significantly greater extent than did melanogaster. At low density (5 pairs of parents) in pure species cultures, 68.7% of simulans pupae were on the medium surface. As parental numbers increased, this proportion decreased. The distribution of melanogaster pupae was quite different, with only 8 to 12% on the medium at all densities. But the remaining pupae tended to occur higher on the cylinder wall as parental numbers increased. The competitive interaction changed during the developmental period. At four and eight days after culture initiation, simulans appeared superior, while for total adult progeny production, melanogaster was slightly superior. These strans of the two species were not ecologically equivalent.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayala, F. J.: Reversal of dominance in competing species of Drosphila. Amer. Naturalist 100, 81–83 (1966).
—: Evolution of fitness. IV. Genetic evloution of interspecific competitive ability in Drosophila. Genetics 61, 373–747 (1969).
Barker, J. S. F.: An adaptation of the population bottle of Reed and Reed (1948). Drosophila Inf. Serv. 34, 113–114 (1960).
—: The estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations. II. Experimental evaluation of factors affecting fitness. Evolution 17, 56–71 (1963a).
—: The estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations. III. The fitness of certain strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 17, 138–146 (1963b).
—, Podger, R.N.: Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: Effects of larval density on viability, developmental period and adult body weight. Ecology 51, 170–189 (1970).
Brown, W. L., Wilson, E. O.: Character displacement. Syst. Zool. 5, 49–64 (1956).
Claringbold, P. J., Barker, J. S. F.: The estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations. J. Theor. Biol. 1, 190–203 (1961).
Futuyma, D. J.: Variation in genetic response to interspecific competition in laboratory populations of Drosophila. Amer. Naturalist 104 239–252 (1970).
Moore, J. A.: Competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. II. The improvement of competitive ability through selection. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 38, 813–817 (1952).
Pimentel, D., Feinberg, E. H., Wood, P. W., Hayes, J. T.: Selection, spatial distribution, and the coexistence of competing fly species. Amer. Naturalist 99, 97–109 (1965).
Sameoto, D. D., Miller, R. S.: Selection of pupation site by Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Ecology 49, 177–180 (1968).
Sokal, R. R., Ehrlich, P. R., Hunter, P. E., Schlarger, G.: Some factors affecting pupation site of Drosophila. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 53, 174–182 (1960).
Wit, C. T. de: On competition. Versl. Landbouwk. Onder. Ned. 66, 1–82 (1960).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barker, J.S.F. Ecological differences and competitive interaction between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans in small laboratory populations. Oecologia 8, 139–156 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345810
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345810