, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 321–346 | Cite as

The influence of vegetational diversity on the population ecology of a specialized herbivore, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

  • Jorma O. Tahvanainen
  • Richard B. Root


The population ecology of Phyllotreta cruciferae Goeze, a flea beetle which is an important pest of cole crops (Brassica oleracea) in central New York was studied in experimental gardens of differing vegetational diversity over a three year period. Adult beetles were more abundant on collards (B. oleracea var. acephala) grown in monocultures than on those grown adjacent to natural vegetation. The emergence of individuals forming the new annual generation was also greater in the pure stands. Predators and parasites appeared to have a negligible influence on the adult beetles in both habitats. Further experiments demonstrated that monocultures were colonized more rapidly and experienced greater feeding damage than stands in which collards had been interplanted with tomatoes and tobacco. Choice experiments in the laboratory showed that chemical stimuli given off by non-host plants (tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum, and ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia) interfered with the host finding and feeding behaviour of P. cruciferae. These results indicate that vegetational diversity can exert a direct influence on populations of phytophagous insects.

We conclude that the environmental capacity (Determination in Schwerdtfeger's terminology) of diverse natural communities is lower than that of natural or man-made monocultures. The “associational resistance” resulting from the higher taxonomic and microclimatic complexity of natural vegetation tends to reduce outbreaks of herbivores in diverse communities.


Natural Vegetation Choice Experiment Lycopersicon Esculentum Population Ecology Pure Stand 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alder, H. L., Roessler, E. B.: Introduction to probability and statistics, 4th ed. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co. 1968.Google Scholar
  2. Andrewartha, H. G., Birch, L. C.: The distribution and abundance of animals. Chicago: Chicago University Press 1954.Google Scholar
  3. Auer, C.: Ergebnisse zwölfjähriger quantitativer Untersuchungen der Populationsbewegungen des Grauen Lärchenwicklers Zeiraphera griseana Hb. (=diniana Guenee) in Oberengadin (1949–1960). Mitt. schweiz. Anst. Forstl. VersWes. 37, 175–263 (1961).Google Scholar
  4. Bey-Bienko, G. Ya.: On some regularities in the changes of the invertebrate fauna during the utilization of virgin steppe (in Russian with English summary). Rev. Ent. U.R.S.S. 40, 763–775 (1961).Google Scholar
  5. Brown, W. J.: Notes on the extralimital distribution of some species of Coleoptera. Can. Ent. 99, 85–93 (1967).Google Scholar
  6. Brues, C. T.: The selection of food-plants by insects, with special reference to lepidopterous larvae. Amer. Naturalist 54, 313–332 (1920).Google Scholar
  7. Bullock, J. A.: The insect factor in plant ecology. J. Indian bot. Soc. 46, 323–330 (1967).Google Scholar
  8. Carne, P. B.: On the population dynamics of the Eucalypt-defoliating sawfly Pegra affinis Kirby (Hymenoptera). Aust. J. Zool. 17, 113–141 (1969).Google Scholar
  9. Clark, L. R.: The population dynamics of Cardiaspina albitextura (Psyllidae). Aust. J. Zool. 12, 362–380 (1964).Google Scholar
  10. Clark, L. R., Geier, P. W., Hughes, R. D., Morris, R. F.: The ecology of insect populations in theory and practice. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd. 1967.Google Scholar
  11. Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L.: Microclimates and the distribution of terrestrial arthropods. A. Rev. Ent. 7, 199–222 (1962).Google Scholar
  12. Dempster, J. P.: Some effects of weed control on the numbers of the small cabbage white (Pieris rapae L.) on Brussels sprouts. J. appl. Ecol. 6, 339–345 (1969).Google Scholar
  13. Dethier, V. G.: Food-plant distribution and density and larval dispersal as factors affecting insect populations. Can. Ent. 88, 45–55 (1959).Google Scholar
  14. Dethier, V. G., Schoonhoven, L. M.: Olfactory coding by lepidopterous larvae. Ent. exp. appl. 12, 535–543 (1969).Google Scholar
  15. Dobson, R. M.: A note on the relative abundance of flea beetles (Phyllotreta Stephens and Psylliodes Berthold) on different cruciferous crops. J. hort. Sci. 31, 291–294 (1956).Google Scholar
  16. Dodd, A. P.: The biological campaign against prickly pear. Commonwealth Prickly Pear Board. Brisbane: A. H. Tucker 1940.Google Scholar
  17. Douwes, P.: Host selection and host finding in Cidaria albulata L. Opusc. ent. 33, 233–279 (1968).Google Scholar
  18. Ehrlich, P. R., Birch, L. C.: The “balance of nature” and “population control”. Amer. Naturalist 101, 97–107 (1967).Google Scholar
  19. Ehrlich, P. R., Raven, P. H.: Butterflies and plants: A study in co-evolution. Evolution 18, 586–608 (1965).Google Scholar
  20. Eidman, H.: Zur Oekologie der Tierwelt des Afrikanischen Regenwaldes. Beitr. z. Kolonialforschung 2, 25–45 (1943).Google Scholar
  21. Elton, C. S.: The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd. 1958.Google Scholar
  22. Emden, H. F. van: The effect of uncultivated land on the distribution of cabbage aphid (Brevicoryne brassicae) on an adjacent crop. J. appl. Ecol. 2, 171–196 (1965).Google Scholar
  23. Engel, H.: Populationsdynamik des Kiefernspanners in verschiedenen Biotypen. VII. Intern. Kongr. f. Entomol. 3, 1941–1949 (1939).Google Scholar
  24. Engel, H.: Über die Populationsbewegung des Kiefernspanners (Bupalus piniarius L.) in verschiedenen Bestandtypen. Z. angew. Ent. 29, 116–163 (1942).Google Scholar
  25. Feeny, P.: Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51, 565–581 (1970).Google Scholar
  26. Feeny, P., Paauwe, K. L., Demong, N. J.: Flea beetles and mustard oils: Host plant specificity of Phyllotreta cruciferae and P. striolata adults (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 63, 832–841 (1970).Google Scholar
  27. Fraenkel, G.: Evaluation of our thoughts on secondary plant substances. Ent. exp. appl. 12, 473–486 (1969).Google Scholar
  28. Friedrichs, K.: Zur Epidemiologie des Kiefernspanners. Z. angew. Ent. 16, 197–205 (1930).Google Scholar
  29. Friedrichs, K., Schaerffenberg, B., Sturm, H.: Über die Feinde des Kiefernspanners, mit Berücksichtigung des Mischwaldes. Z. angew. Ent. 24, 621–641 (1940).Google Scholar
  30. Galecka, B.: The role of predators in the reduction of two species of potato aphids, Aphis nasturtii Kalt. and A. frangulae Kalt. Ekol. Pol. (Ser. A) 14, 245–274 (1966).Google Scholar
  31. Gillett, J. B.: Pest pressure, an underestimated factor in evolution. Taxonomy and geography. Systematics Assoc. Publ. No. 4, 37–46 (1962).Google Scholar
  32. Graham, S. A.: Biology and control of white-pine weevil, Pissodes strobi Peck. Cornell Agric. Expt. Sta. Bull. 449, 3–32 (1926).Google Scholar
  33. Graham, S. A.: Forest insects and the law of natural compensations. Can. Ent. 88, 45–55 (1956).Google Scholar
  34. Görnitz, K.: Untersuchungen über in Cruciferen enthaltene Insekten-Attraktivstoffe. Nachrichtenbl. Deut. Pflanzenschutzdienst, N.F. 7, 81–95 (1953).Google Scholar
  35. Görnitz, K.: Weitere Untersuchungen über Insekten-Attraktivstoffe aus Cruciferen. Nachrichtenbl. Deut. Pflanzenschutzdienst, N.F. 10, 137–147 (1956).Google Scholar
  36. Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E., Slobodkin, L. B.: Community structure, population control and competition. Amer. Naturalist 94, 421–425 (1960).Google Scholar
  37. Harley, K. L. S., Thorsteinson, A. J.: The influence of plant chemicals on the feeding and survival of the two-striped grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus (Say), Acrididae: Orthoptera. Can. J. Zool. 45, 305–318 (1967).Google Scholar
  38. Harper, J. L.: The role of predation in vegetational diversity. Brookhaven Nat. Lab. Sympos. in Biol., No 22, 48–62 (1969).Google Scholar
  39. Haskell, P. T., Mordue, A. J.: The role of mouthpart receptors in feeding behavior of Schistocerca gregaria. Ent. exp. appl. 12, 591–610 (1969).Google Scholar
  40. Heikertinger, F.: Resultate fünfzehnjähriger Untersuchungen über die Nahrungspflanzen einheimischer Halticinen. Ent. Blätt. 21, 81–92, 119–131 (1925).Google Scholar
  41. Holdaway, F. G.: An experimental study of the growth of populations of the flour beetle, Tribolium confusum Duval, as affected by atmospheric moisture. Ecol. Monogr. 2, 262–304 (1932).Google Scholar
  42. Hsiao, T. H.: Chemical basis of host selection and plant resistance in oligophagous insects. Ent. exp. appl. 12, 777–788 (1969).Google Scholar
  43. Hsiao, T. H., Fraekel, G.: The role of secondary plant substances in the food specificity of the Colorado potato beetle. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61, 485–493 (1968).Google Scholar
  44. Huffaker, C. B.: Fundamentals of biological control of weeds. Hilgardia 27, 101–157 (1957).Google Scholar
  45. Huffaker, C. B.: Competition for food by phytophagous mites. Hilgardia, 37, 533–561 (1966).Google Scholar
  46. Huffaker, C. B., Kennet, C. E.: A ten-year study of vegetational changes associated with biological control of Klamath weed. J. Range Manage. 12, 69–82 (1959).Google Scholar
  47. Huffaker, C. B., Messenger, P. S.: The concept and significance of natural control, p. 74–117. In: DeBach (ed.), Biological control of insect pests and weeds. New York: Reinhold 1964.Google Scholar
  48. Ishikawa, S., Hirao, T., Arai, N.: Chemosensory basis of hostplant selection in the silkworm. Ent. exp. appl. 12, 544–554 (1969).Google Scholar
  49. Janzen, D. H.: The unexploited tropics. Bull. ecol. Soc. Am. 51, No 3, 4–7 (1970a).Google Scholar
  50. Janzen, D. H.: Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical rain forests. Amer. Naturalist 104, 501–528 (1970b).Google Scholar
  51. Jones, F. G. W., Jones, M. G.: Pests of field crops. London: Edward Arnold Ltd. 1964.Google Scholar
  52. Kalshoven, L. G. E.: Important outbreaks of insect pests in Indonesia. Trans. IXth intern. ent. Congress 2, 229–234 (1952).Google Scholar
  53. Karg, J.: The effect of shelterbelts on density and reduction of numbers of the Colorado beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say). Ekol. Pol. (Ser. A) 17, 149–157 (1969).Google Scholar
  54. Knipling, E. F.: New horizons and the outlook for pest control. Scientific aspects of pest control. Natl. Acad. Sci. Natl. Res. Council Publ. 1402, 455–470 (1966).Google Scholar
  55. Loan, C. C.: Studies on the taxonomy and biology of the Euphorinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). II. Host relations of six Microctonus species. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 60, 236–240 (1967).Google Scholar
  56. MacArthur, R.: Fluctuations of animal populations, and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36, 533–536 (1955).Google Scholar
  57. Margalef, R.: Diversity and stability. A practical proposal and a model of interdependence. Brookhaven Nat. Lab. Sympos. in Biol., No 22, 25–37 (1969).Google Scholar
  58. Matsumoto, Y.: Volatile organic sulfur compounds as insect attractants with special reference to host selections, p. 133–160. In: D. L. Wood, R. M. Silverstein and M. Nakajima (ed.), Control of insect behavior by natural products. New York: Academic Press 1970.Google Scholar
  59. Miller, C. A.: The interaction of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), and the parasite Apanteles fumiferanae (Vier.). Can. Ent. 91, 457–477 (1959).Google Scholar
  60. Miller, C. A.: The interaction of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), and the parasite Glypta fumiferanae (Vier.). Can. Ent. 92, 839–850 (1960).Google Scholar
  61. Milliron, H. E.: A European flea beetle injuring crucifers in North America. J. econ. Ent. 46, 179 (1953).Google Scholar
  62. Milne, A.: The natural control of insect populations. Can. Ent. 89, 193–213 (1957).Google Scholar
  63. Monteith, L. G.: Influence of plants other than food plants of their hosts on hostfinding by tachinid parasites. Can. Ent. 92, 641–652 (1960).Google Scholar
  64. Morris, R. F.: Single factor analysis in population dynamics. Ecology 40, 580–588 (1959).Google Scholar
  65. Morris, R. F. (ed.): The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Canada 31, 1–332 (1963).Google Scholar
  66. Morris, R. F.: The value of historical data in population research with particular reference to Hyphantria cunea Drury. Can. Ent. 96, 356–368 (1964).Google Scholar
  67. Mukerji, M. K., Harcourt, D. G.: Design of a sampling plant for studies on the population dynamics of the cabbage maggot, Hylemya brassicae (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). Can. Ent. 102, 1513–1518 (1970).Google Scholar
  68. Murdoch, W. W.: “Community structure, population control and competition” — a critique. Amer. Naturalist 100, 219–226 (1966).Google Scholar
  69. Neilson, M. M., Morris, R. F.: The regulation of European sawfly numbers in the Maritime Provinces of Canada from 1937 to 1963. Can. Ent. 96, 773–784 (1964).Google Scholar
  70. Newton, H. F. C.: The biology of flea beetles (Phyllotreta) attacking cultivated Cruciferae. J. South-East. Agr. Coll. Wye. 25, 90–115 (1928).Google Scholar
  71. Nicholson, A. J.: An outline of the dynamics of animal populations. Aust. J. Zool. 2, 9–65 (1954).Google Scholar
  72. Nicholson, A. J.: Dynamics of insect populations. A. Rev. Ent. 3, 107–136 (1958).Google Scholar
  73. Nuorteva, P.: The influence of Oporinia autumnata (Bkh.) (Lep., Geometridae) on the timber line in subarctic conditions. Ann. ent. Fenn. 23, 270–277 (1963).Google Scholar
  74. Paine, R. T.: Food web complexity and species diversity. Amer. Naturalist 100, 65–75 (1966).Google Scholar
  75. Palm, T.: Följdverkningar av fjällbjörkmätarens härjning i Abiskodalen 1954–1956. En koleopterologisk undersökning somrarna 1958 och 1959. Ent. Tidsk. 80, 120–136 (1959).Google Scholar
  76. Philbrick, H., Gregg, R. B.: Companion plants and how to use them. New York: Devin-Adair Co. 1966.Google Scholar
  77. Pimentel, D.: Species diversity and insect population outbreaks. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 54, 76–86 (1961).Google Scholar
  78. Read, D. P., Feeny, P. P., Root, R. B.: Habitat selection by the aphid parasite Diaeretiella rapae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and hyperparasite Charips brassicae (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Can. Ent. 102, 1567–1578 (1970).Google Scholar
  79. Ridley, H. N.: The dispersal of plants throughout the world. Ashfort, England: L. Reeve & Co. 1930.Google Scholar
  80. Root, R. B.: The organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: The fauna of collards, Brassica oleracea. Ecol. Monogr. (in press, 1973).Google Scholar
  81. Root, R. B., Skelsey, J. J.: Biotic factors involved in crucifer aphid outbreaks following insecticide application. J. econ. Ent. 62, 223–233 (1969).Google Scholar
  82. Root, R. B., Tahvanainen, J. O.: Role of winter cress, Barbarea vulgaris, as a temporal host in the seasonal development of the Crucifer fauna. Ann. entomol. Soc. Amer. 62, 852–855 (1969).Google Scholar
  83. Schneider, F.: Ein Vergleich von Urwald und Monokultur in bezug auf ihre Gefährdung durch phytophage Insekten, auf Grund einiger Beobachtungen an der Ostküste von Sumatra. Schweiz. Z. Forstw. 90, 41–55, 82–89 (1939).Google Scholar
  84. Schoonhoven, L. M., Dethier, V. G.: Sensory aspects of host-plant discrimination by lepidopterous larvae. Arch. Néerl. Zool. 16, 497–530 (1966).Google Scholar
  85. Schwerdtfeger, F.: Die Waldkrankheiten. Hamburg: P. Parey 1957.Google Scholar
  86. Schwerdtfeger, F.: Ökologie der Tiere. I. Autökologie. Hamburg: P. Parey 1963.Google Scholar
  87. Schwerdtfeger, F.: Eine integrierte Theorie zur Abundanzdynamik tierischer Populationen. Oecologia (Berl.) 1, 265–295 (1969).Google Scholar
  88. Simmonds, H. W.: Biological control of noxious weeds, with special reference to the plants Clidemia hirta (The Curse) and Stachytarpheta jamaicensis (Blue Rat Tail). Fiji Dept. Agr. Jour. 7, 3–10 (1934).Google Scholar
  89. Slobodkin, L. B., Smith, F. E., Hairston, N. G.: Regulation in terrestrial ecosystems and the implied balance of nature. Amer. Naturalist 101, 109–124 (1967).Google Scholar
  90. Smith, J. O., Peterson, A.: Microctonus vittatae, a parasite of adult flea beetles, and observations on hosts. J. econ. Ent. 43, 581–585 (1950).Google Scholar
  91. Solomon, M. E.: Analysis of processes involved in the natural control of insects. Adv. ecol. Res. 2, 1–58 (1964).Google Scholar
  92. Southwood, T. R. E.: The interpretation of population change. J. Anim. Ecol. 36, 519–529 (1967).Google Scholar
  93. Streams, F. A., Shahjahan, M., LeMasurier, J. G.: Influence of plants on the parasitization of the tarnished plant bug (Lygus lineolaris) by Leiophron pallipes. J. econ. Ent. 61, 996–999 (1968).Google Scholar
  94. Tahvanainen, J. O.: Phenology and microhabitat selection of some flea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on wild and cultivated Crucifers in central New York. Entomol. Scandinavica 3, 120–138 (1972).Google Scholar
  95. Terao, A., Tanaka, T.: Population growth of the waterflea Moina macrocarpa Strauss. Proc. Imper. Acad. 4, 553–555 (1928).Google Scholar
  96. Thorsteinson, A. K.: Host selection in phytophagous insects. A. Rev. Ent. 5, 193–218 (1960).Google Scholar
  97. Tinsley, T. W.: The ecological approach to pest and disease problems of cocoa in West Africa. Trop. Sci. 6, 38–46 (1964).Google Scholar
  98. Tirrell, R.: Not many pests in my patch. Org. Gard. Farming 17, No 5, 60–63 (1970).Google Scholar
  99. Tothill, J. D.: Notes on the outbreaks of the spruce budworm, forest tent caterpillar, and larch sawfly in New Brunswick. Proc. Acadian ent. Soc. 8, 172–182 (1923).Google Scholar
  100. Tothill, J. D.: Some reflections on the cause of insect outbreaks. Proc. 10th int. Congress Ent. 4, 553–555 (1958).Google Scholar
  101. Uvarov, B. P.: Problems of insect ecology in developing countries. J. appl. Ecol. 1, 159–168 (1964).Google Scholar
  102. Varley, G. C., Gradwell, G. R.: Interpreting winter moth population changes. Proc. int. Congress Ent. 12. London, 1964, 377–378 (1965).Google Scholar
  103. Von Hassel, G.: Das Geheimnis des Urwaldes. Anz. Schädlingsk. 1, 42–43 (1925).Google Scholar
  104. Vouté, A. D.: Regulations of the density of the insect-populations in virgin-forests and cultivated woods. Arch. Néerl. Zool. 7, 435–470 (1946).Google Scholar
  105. Watt, K. E. F.: Community stability and the strategy of biological control. Can. Ent. 97, 887–895 (1965).Google Scholar
  106. Whittaker, R. H.: Evolution of diversity in plant communities. Brookhaven Nat. Lab. Sympos. in Biol., No. 22, 178–196 (1969).Google Scholar
  107. Whittaker, R. H., Feeny, P. P.: Allelochemics: Chemical interactions between species. Science 171, 757–770 (1971).Google Scholar
  108. Wilbert, H.: Festlegung und Einhaltung der mittleren Dichte von Insektenpopulationen. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 50, 576–615 (1962).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorma O. Tahvanainen
    • 1
  • Richard B. Root
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyCornell UniversityIthacaU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyCornell UniversityIthacaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations