Summary
Single-species cultures of D. melanogaster Oregon-R-C and D. simulans v were set up with 5, 50, 100, 200, 300 or 400 pairs of parents. These parents were discarded after 48 hours, and the numbers and wet weights of emerging progeny recorded twice daily. For each culture, the fitness components estimated were total number of progeny, total progeny biomass, average male and average female wet weights, mean developmental period, and sex ratio. D. melanogaster had higher progeny productivity and longer mean developmental period. For both species, as adult density increased, progeny number per culture increased to a maximum and then decreased, but the average number of progeny per female decreased rapidly from the lowest density. The cause of this decreased progeny number per female differed in the two species. For simulans, it was due to decreased fecundity per female, possibly a behavioural response to crowding. For melanogaster, the decreased progeny number per female was mainly due to reduced immature stage viability as a result of increased larval crowding. Reduction in fecundity per female was relatively small, as compared with simulans.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker, J. S. F.: The estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations. II. Experimental evaluation of factors affecting fitness. Evolution 17, 56–71 (1963a).
Barker, J. S. F.: The estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations. III. The fitness of certain strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 17, 138–146 (1963b).
Barker, J. S. F.: The estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations. V. Generation interval and heterogeneity in competition. Evolution 21, 299–309 (1967a).
Barker, J. S. F.: The fitness of single-species populations of Drosophila. Evolution 21, 606–619 (1967b).
Barker, J. S. F., Podger, R. N.: Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: Effects of larval density and short-term adult starvation on fecundity, egg hatchability and adult viability. Ecology 51, 855–864 (1970a).
Barker, J. S. F., Podger, R. N.: Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: Effects of larval density on viability, developmental period and adult body weight. Ecology 51, 170–189 (1970b).
Chiang, H. C., Hodson, A. C.: An analytical study of population growth in Drosophila melanogaster. Ecol. Monographs 20, 173–206 (1950).
Claringbold, P. J., Barker, J. S. F.: The estimation of relative fitness of Drosophila populations. J. theor. Biol. 1, 190–203 (1961).
Dobzhansky, Th., Lewontin, R. C., Pavlovsky, O.: The capacity for increase in chromosomally polymorphic and monomorphic populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Heredity 19, 597–614 (1964).
Ohba, S.: Chromosomal polymorphism and capacity for increase under near optimal conditions. Heredity 22, 169–186 (1967).
Pearl, R.: The influence of density of population upon egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. J. exp. Zool. 63, 57–84 (1932).
Pearl, R., Parker, S. L.: On the influence of density of population upon the rate of reproduction in Drosophila. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.). 8, 212–219 (1922).
Sameoto, D. D., Miller, R. S.: Factors controlling the productivity of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Ecology, 47, 695–704 (1966).
Watt, K. E. F.: The effect of population density on fecundity in insects. Canad. Ent. 92, 674–695 (1960).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barker, J.S.F. Adult population density, fecundity and productivity in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans . Oecologia 11, 83–92 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345125
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00345125