Summary
Among some species of Sonoran Desert rodents microhabitat differences are density dependent. I studied the differences in microhabitat use among four species of heteromyid rodents (Dipodomys merriami, Perognathus amplus, P. baileyi, and P. penicillatus) at low and at high population densities. Microhabitats are defined by the abundance and size distribution of desert shrubs. During a period of low population density the rodent species showed substantial microhabitat differentiation. Following a large increase in pocket mouse (Perognathus spp.) numbers differences in microhabitat use between species disappeared. The lack of microhabitat differentiation at high density is due to microhabitat shifts rather than an expansion in the number of microhabitats used. The shifts lead to increased similarity among species in microhabitat use. Microhabitat overlap is not constant but it is highly variable and sensitive to changes in rodent abundance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams P (1976) Niche overlap and environmental variability. Mathematical Biosciences 28:257–372
Beatley JC (1969) Dependence of desert rodents on winter annuals and precipitation. Ecology 50:721–724
Beatley JC (1976) Rainfall and fluctuating plant populations in relation to distributions and numbers of desert rodents in southern Nevada. Oecologia (Berl) 24:21–42
Brown JH (1975) Geographical ecology of desert rodents. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and Evolution of Communities, Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass USA, p 315–341
Chew RM, Butterworth BB (1964) Ecology of rodents in Indian Cove (Mojave Desert), Joshua Tree National Monument, California. J Mammal 45:203–225
Cody ML (1975) Towards a theory of continental species diversities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Communities, Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, p 214–257
Colwell RK, Fuentes ER (1975) Experimental studies of the niche. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 6:281–310
Cooley WW, Lohnes PR (1971) Multivariate data analysis. John Wiley and sons, Inc, New York, NY, USA
Crowell KL, Pimm SL (1976) Competition and niche shifts of mice introduced onto small islands. Oikos 27:251–258
Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Communities, Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, p 342–444
Dueser RD, Shugart HH (1979) Niche pattern in a forest-floor small-mammal fauna. Ecology 60:108–118
Fretwell SD, Lucas HL Jr (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheoretica 19:16–36
Grant PR (1972) Interspecific competition among rodents. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 3:79–106
Holbrook SJ (1979) Habitat utilization, competitive interactions, and coexistence of three species of cricetine rodents in east-central Arizona. Ecology 60:758–769
Lemen CA, Rosenzweig ML (1978) Microhabitat selection in two species of heteromyid rodents. Oecologia (Berl) 33:127–135
M'Closkey RT (1976) Community structure in sympatric rodents. Ecology 57:728–739
M'Closkey RT (1978) Niche separation and assembly in four species of Sonoran Desert rodents. Amer Natur 112:683–694
M'Closkey RT (1980) Spatial patterns in sizes of seeds collected by four species of heteromyid rodents. Ecology 61:486–489
McNaughton SJ, Wolf LL (1970) Dominance and the niche in ecological systems. Science 167:131–139
Nel JAJ (1978) Habitat heterogeneity and changes in small mammal community structure and resource utilization in the southern Kalahari. Bull, Carnegie Museum of Natural History 6:118–131
Pianka ER (1975) Niche relations of desert lizards. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Communities, Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, p 292–314
Price MV (1977) Validity of live trapping as a measure of foraging activity of heteromyid rodents. J Mammal 58:107–110
Price MV (1978a) The role of microhabitat in structuring desert rodent communities. Ecology 59:910–921
Price MV (1978b) Seed dispersion preferences of coexisting desert rodent species. J Mammal 59:624–626
Reichman OJ, Oberstein D (1977) Selection of seed distribution types by Dipodomys merriami and Perognathus amplus. Ecology 58:636–643
Reichman OJ, Van De Graaff KM (1975) Association between ingestion of green vegetation and desert rodent reproduction. J Mammal 56:503–506
Rosenzweig ML (1979) Optimal habitat selection in two-species competitive systems. Fortschr Zool 25:283–293
Rotenberry JT, Wiens JA (1980) Habitat structure, patchiness, and avian communities in North American steppe vegetation: a multivariate analysis. Ecology 61:1228–1250
Roughgarden J (1974) Niche width: Biogeographic patterns among Anolis lizard populations. Amer Natur 108:429–442
Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39
Schroder GE, Rosenzweig ML (1975) Perturbation analysis of competition and overlap in habitat utilization between Dipodomys ordii and D merriami. Oceologia (Berl) 19:9–29
Smith JNM, Dawkins R (1971) The hunting behaviour of individual Great Tits in relation to spatial variation in their food density. Anim Behav 19:695–706
Sokal RR, Rohlf JJ (1969) Biometry. WH Freeman and Co, San Francisco
Vandermeer JH (1972) Niche theory. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 3:107–132
Werner EE, Hall DJ (1979) Foraging efficiency and habitat switiching in competing sunfishes. Ecology 60:256–264
Whitford WG (1976) Temporal fluctuations in density and diversity of desert rodent populations. J Mammal 57:351–369
Wondolleck JT (1978) Forage-area separation and overlap in heteromyid rodents. J Mammal 59:510–518
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
M'Closkey, R.T. Microhabitat use in coexisting desert rodents—The role of population density. Oecologia 50, 310–315 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344968
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344968