Skip to main content
Log in

Pitfalls of computed tomography in diagnosis of discitis

  • Originals
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Sixteen patients with discitis from January 1980 through December 1983 underwent 18CT scans for initial evaluation. In six scans the study produced a false negative result (sensitivity 63%, 11/16). In three of these six the scan was performed at the wrong disc level, and in three the error was interpretive. During the same time period 6 patients had a CT diagnosis of discitis which proved incorrect (positive predictive value 63%), three of which had fractures, two had normal post discectomy changes, and one had a neuropathic arthropathy. These studies were reviewed in a blinded fashion along with 30 CT scans of post operative patients without clinical or laboratory evidence of discitis. The CT findings in the discitis patients were: (a( anterior paravertebral soft tissue swelling with obliteration of paravertebral fat planes, (b) fragmentation or erosions of vertebral end plates, and (c) paravertebral fluid collection (abscess). Both (a) and (b) were seen in 13/15 patients, (a) alone in 1/15, (b) alone in 1/15, and all three (a, b, c) in 2/15. The CT scan is diagnostic of discitis in those with all three findings. In those patients with only (a) or both (a) and (b), the CT can be suggestive of discitis in the proper clinical setting when correlated with plain film findings: however, these CT findings are also observed in other conditions. Involvement of the spinal canal by inflammatory mass was seen in 6/16 patients with discitis. Low attenuation (hypodensity) of the affected disc was not observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hermann G, Mendelson DS, Cohen BA, Train, JS (1983) Role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of infectious spondylitis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 7: 961–968

    Google Scholar 

  2. Golimbu C, Firooznia H, Rafii M (1983) CT of Osteomyetilis of the Spine. AJNR 4: 1207–1211

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sartoris DJ, Moskowitz PS, Kaufman RA, Ziprkowski MN, Berger PE (1983) Childhood diskitis: computed tomographic findings. Radiology 149: 701–707

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schauwecker DS, Park HM, Mock BH (1984)_Evaluation of complicating osteomyelitis with Tc-99m MDP, In-111 granulocytes, and Ga-67 citrate. J Nucl Med (in press)

  5. Sapico FL, Montgomerie JZ (1980) Vertebral osteomyelitis in intravenous drug abusers. Report of three cases and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis 2: 196–206

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCain GA, Harth M, Bell DA, Disney TF, Austin T, Ralph E (1981) Septic discitis. J Rheumatol 8: 100–109

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rawlings CE, Wilkins RH, Gallis HA, Goldner JL, Francis R (1983) Postoperative intervertebral disc space infection. Neurosurgery 13: 371–376

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer GW, Popich GA, Sullivan DE, Mayfield G,Mazat BA, Patterson PH (1978) Diskitis: a prospective diagnostic analysis. Pediatrics 62: 543–548

    Google Scholar 

  9. Price AC, Allen JH, Eggers FM, Shaff MI, James AE (1983) Intervertebral disk-space infection: CT changes. Radiology 149: 725–729

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lardé D, Mathieu D, Frija J, Gaston A, Vasile N (1982) Vertebral osteomyelitis: disk hypodensity on CT. AJR 139: 963–967

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kopecky, K.K., Gilmor, R.L., Scott, J.A. et al. Pitfalls of computed tomography in diagnosis of discitis. Neuroradiology 27, 57–66 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00342518

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00342518

Key words

Navigation