Skip to main content
Log in

Contrast enhancement of brain tumors and irradiated normal brain: a comparison of Iohexol and Iothalamate

  • Originals
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The nonionic contrast agent iohexol was compared with the ionic agent iothalamate for contrast enhancement of brain tumors and radiation brain damage in dogs. Tissue enhancement during infusion of contrast and 5, 10, 15 and 30 min later was measured using quantitative computed tomography. Blood iodine was measured using x-ray fluorescence. Peak contrast enhancement occurred during infusion in tumors and after 5 min in irradiated normal brain for both contrast agents. Absolute uptake of contrast in each lesion was the same for both agents when normalized to total grams of iodine administered. Blood iodine levels were slightly but not significantly higher using iohexol. The reduced osmotic load and similar contrast enhancement of lesions suggest that the nonionic contrast medium iohexol may be a useful agent for routine CT of the brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grainger RG (1980) Osmolality of intravascular radiological contrast media. Br J Radiol 53: 739–746

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grainger RG (1979) A clinical trial of a new low osmolality contrast medium sodium and meglumine ioxaglate (Hexabrix) compared with meglumine iothalamate (Conray) for carotid arteriography. Br J Radiol 52: 781–786

    Google Scholar 

  3. Levorstad K, Kolbenstvedt A, Kolmannskog F, Sommerfelt S Chr, Sormorken H, Andrew E, Sveen K (1983) Tolerability of iohexol after injection into healthy volunteers. Acta Radiol Diag 24: 241–251

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dean PB, Kivisaari L, Kormano M (1983) Contrast enhancement pharmacokinetics of six ionic and nonionic contrast media. Invest Radiol 18: 368–374

    Google Scholar 

  5. Skalpe IO, Anke IM (1983) Complications in cerebral angiography. A comparison between the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol and meglumine metrixoate (Isopaque Cerebral). Neuroradiology 25: 157–160

    Google Scholar 

  6. Winfield AC, Dray RJ, Kirchner FK Jr, Muhletaler CA, Price RR (1983) Iohexol for excretory urography: A comparative study. Am J Roentgenol 141: 571–573

    Google Scholar 

  7. Morris TW, Harnish PP, Reece K, Katzberg RW (1983) Tissue fluid shifts during renal arteriography with conventional and low osmolality agents. Invest Radiol 18: 335–340

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mancini GBJ, Atwood JE, Bhargava V, Slutsky RA, Grover M, Higgins CB (1984) Comparative effects of ionic and nonionic contrast materials on indexes of isovolumic contraction and relaxation in humans. Am J Cardiol 53: 228–233

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fike JR, Cann CE, Norman D, Turrel JM, Le Couteur RA, Pflugfelder CM, Borcich JK (1984) Relative uptake of low-and high-osmolality contrast media in CT of brain tumors. Am J Neuroradiol 5: 413–417

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fike JR, LeCouteur RA, Cann CE, Pflugfelder CM (1981) Computerized tomography of brain tumors of the rostral and middle fossas in the dog. Am J Vet Res 42: 275–281

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fike JR, Cann CE, Davis RL, Borcich JK, Phillips TL, Russell LB (1984) Computed tomography analysis of the canine brain: Effects of hemibrain x-irradiation. Radiat Res 99: 294–310

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fike JR, Cann CE, Berninger WH (1982) Quantitative evaluation of the canine brain using computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 6: 325–333

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fike JR, Cann CE, Phillips TL, Bernstein M, Gutin PH, Turowski K, Weaver KA, Davis RL, Higgins RJ, DaSilva V (1985) Radiation brain damage induced by interstitial sources: A canine model evaluated by quantitative computed tomography. Neurosurgery 16: 530–537

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufman L, Deconinck F, Price DC, Guesry P, Wilson CJ. Hruska B, Swann SJ, Camp DC, Voegele AL, Friesen RD, Nelson JA (1976) An automated fluorescent excitation analysis system for medical applications. Invest Radiol 11: 210–215

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fike JR, Cann CE (1984) Contrast medium accumulation and washout in canine brain tumors and irradiated normal brain: A CT study of kinetics. Radiology 151: 115–120

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gardeur D, Lavtrov J, Millard JC, Berger N, Metzger J (1980) Pharmacokinetics of contrast media: experimental results in dog and man with CT implications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 4: 178–185

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fike, J., Cann, C., Turowski, K. et al. Contrast enhancement of brain tumors and irradiated normal brain: a comparison of Iohexol and Iothalamate. Neuroradiology 28, 61–64 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341768

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341768

Key words

Navigation