Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The functional significance of the browser-grazer dichotomy in African ruminants

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The allometric relationships for the fermentation rate of dry matter, the total energy concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFAs), the energy supplied from VFA production and the mass of the digesta contents within the rumen or caecum and proximal colon (hindgut) were used to test whether the digestive strategies of grazing and browsing African ruminants differ. The wet and dry mass of the contents of the rumen and hindgut were allometrically related to body mass (BM). These relationships did not differ between browsing and grazing ruminants. The fermentation rates in the rumen were strongly allometric and the intercepts of the relationships did not differ between browsers and grazers. The fermentation rates in the hindgut were not allometrically related to BM and did not differ between ruminants with different feeding habits. Likewise, the total energy concentration of the VFAs in the rumen and hindgut showed no allometric scaling and did not differ between browsing and grazing ruminants. The energy supplied by VFA production in both the rumen and hindgut of African ruminants scaled at around 0.8 with BM. Only in the case of the energy supplied by VFAs in the rumen were there significantly different intercepts for browsing and grazing ruminants. The energy supplied by VFA production in the rumen was inadequate to meet the energy requirements for maintenance of browsers and small grazers. The retention time of digesta in the alimentary tract was positively related to BM although there was no difference in the allometric relationships for grazers and browsers. The results of these analyses suggest that, after controlling for the effects of body mass, there is little difference in digestive strategy between African ruminants with different morphological adaptations of the gut.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allo AA, Oh JH, Longhurst WM, Connolly GE (1973) VFA production in the digestive systems of deer and sheep. J Wildl Manage 37: 202–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JM (1980) Studies of intake and digestion in muntjac Muntiacus reevsi. M.Phil. Thesis, University of Cambridge

  • Baker DL, Hobbs NT (1987) Strategies of digestion: digestive efficiency and retention times of forage diets in montane ungulates. Can J Zool 65: 1978–1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell RHV (1971) A grazing ecosystem in the Serengeti. Sci Am 224: 86–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaxter KL (1962) The energy metabolism of ruminants. Hutchison Scientific and Technical, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomker EA (1983) Volatile fatty acid production in the grey duiker, Sylvicapra grimmia. S Afr J Anim Sci 13: 33–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody S (1945) Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Case TJ (1979) Optimal body size and an animal's diet. Acta Biotheor 28: 54–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens ET, Maloiy GMO (1983) Digestive physiology of East African wild ruminants. Comp Biochem Physiol 76A: 319–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens ET, Maloiy GMO, Sutton JD (1983) Molar proportions of volatile fatty acids in the gastrointestinal tract of East African wild ruminants. Comp Biochem Physiol 76A: 217–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Demment MW, Longhurst WM (1987) Browsers and grazers: constraints on feeding ecology imposed by gut morphology and body size. In: Santana OP, Silva AG da, Foote WC (eds) Proceedings of the IVth International Conference on Goats. Departamento de Difusao de Tecnologia, Brasilia, pp 989–1004

    Google Scholar 

  • Demment M, Soest PJ van (1985) A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and non-ruminant herbivores. Am Nat 125: 641–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Foose TM (1982) Trophic strategies of ruminant versus nonruminant ungulates. PhD Thesis, University of Chicago

  • Giesecke D, Gylswyk NO van (1975) A study of feeding types and certain rumen functions in six species of South African wild ruminants. J Agric Sci 85: 75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill J (1959) Die Durchgangszeiten der Nahrung durch den Verdauungskanal des Elches. Trans IV Cong Game Biol. Arnhem, pp 155–164

  • Hobbs NT, Baker DL, Gill RB (1983) Comparative nutritional ecology of montane ungulates during winter. J Wildl Manage 47: 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann RR (1973) The ruminant stomach: stomach structure and feeding habits of East African game ruminants. (East African Monographs in Biology 2). East African Literature Bureau, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann RR (1984) Comparative anatomical studies imply adaptive variations of ruminant digestive physiology. Can J Anim Sci 64 (Suppl): 203–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann RR (1989) Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants. A comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78: 443–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann RR, Stewart DRM (1972) Grazer or browser: a classification based on the stomach structure and feeding habits of East African ruminants. Mammalia 36: 226–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe PP (1977a) Rumen fermentation and body weight in African ruminants. Proc XIIIth Int Cong Game Biol. The Wildlife Society, Washington DC, pp 141–150

  • Hoppe PP (1977b) How to survive heat and aridity: Ecophysiology of the dikdik antelope. Vet Medic Rev 1: 77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe PP, Gywnne MD (1978) Food retention time in the digestive tract of the suni antelope (Nesotragus moschatus). Saeugetierkd Mitt 26: 236–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe PP, Qvortrup SA, Woodford MH (1977a) Rumen fermentation and food selection in East African zebu cattle, wildebeest, Coke's hartebeest and topi. J Zool London 181: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe PP, Qvortrup SA, Woodford MH (1977b) Rumen fermentation and food selection in East African sheep, goats, Thomson's gazelle, Grant's gazelle and impala. J Agric Sci 89: 129–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe PP, Hoven W van, Von Engelhardt W, Prins RA, Lankhorst A, Gwynne MD (1983) Pregastric and caecal fermentation in dikdik Madoqua kirki and suni Nesotragus moschatus. Comp Biochem Physiol 75A: 517–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan GW, Hunter EA (1992) Introduction to REML for scientists, Scottish Agricultural Statistics Service, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoven W van, Boomker EA (1981) Feed utilization and digestion in the black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou, Zimmerman, 1780) in the Golden Gate Highlands National Park. S Afr J Wildl Res 11: 35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungate RE (1966) The rumen and its microbes. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungate RE, Phillips GD, McGregor A, Hungate DP, Buechner HK (1959) Microbial fermentation in certain mammals. Science 30: 1192–1194

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston JE, Rector BS, Ellis WC, Allen ML (1986) Dynamics of digestion in cattle, sheep, goats and deer. J Anim Sci 62: 208–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Illius AW, Gordon IJ (1991) Prediction of intake and digestion of ruminants by a model of rumen kinetics integrating animal size and plant characteristics. J Agric Sci 116: 145–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Illius AW, Gordon IJ (1993) Diet selection in mammalian herbivores: constraints and tactics. In: Hughes RN (ed) Diet selection. An interdisciplinary approach to foraging behaviour. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 157–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarman PJ (1974) The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48: 215–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Katoh K, Kajita Y, Odashima M, Ohta M, Saski Y (1991) Passage and digestibility of lucerne (Medicago sativa) hay in Japanese sika deer (Cervus nippon) and sheep under restricted feeding. Br J Nutr 66: 399–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay RNB (1987) Comparative studies of food propulsion in ruminants. In: Ooms LAA, Degtyse AD, Van Miert ASJPAM (eds) Physiological and pharmacological aspects of the reticulo-rumen. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, pp 155–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay RNB, Von Engelhardt WV, White RG (1980) The digestive physiology and wild ruminants. In: Ruckebusch Y, Thivend P (eds) Digestive physiology and metabolism in ruminants, MTP Press, Lancaster, pp 743–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy PM, McSweeney CS, Welch JG (1992) Influence of dietary particle size on intake, digestion, and passage rate of digesta in goats and sheep fed wheaten (Triticum aestivum) hay. Small Rum Res 9: 125–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber M (1961) The fire of life, Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawes Agricultural Trust (1988) Genstat 5 reference manual. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Leng RA, Brett DJ (1966) Simultaneous measurements of the rates of production of acetic, propionic and butyric acid in the rumen of sheep on different diets and the correlation between production rates and concentrations of these acids in the rumen. Brit J Nutr 20: 541–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Luginbuhl J-M, Pond KR, Burns JC (1990) Physical limits to ruminal escape: Experiences with the blue duiker In: Oftedal OT, Barboza PS (eds) Digestive strategies of animals. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, pp 10–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloiy GMO, Clemens ET (1991) Aspects of digestion and in vitro fermentation in the caecum of some East African herbivores. J Zool London 224: 293–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloiy GMO, Clemens ET, Kamau JMZ (1982) Aspects of digestion and in vitro rumen fermentation rate in six species of East African wild ruminants. J Zool London 197: 345–353

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell RE, Sisler DG, Schermerhorn EC, Reed JD, Hauer RP (1983) Game or cattle for meat production on Kenya range lands? (Agricultural Mimeograph 101), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ, Georgiadis NJ (1986) Ecology of African grazing and browsing ungulates. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17: 39–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne JA, Macrae JC, Spence AM, Wilson S (1978) A comparison of the voluntary intake and digestion of a range of forages at different times of the year by the sheep and red deer (Cervus elaphus). Br J Nutr 40: 347–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Morat P, Nordin M (1978) Maximum food intake and passage of markers in the alimentary tract of the lesser mousedeer. Malays Appl Biol 7: 11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy MR, Baldwin RL, Koong LJ (1982) Estimation of the stoichiometric parameters for rumen fermentation of roughage and concentrate diets. J Anim Sci 55: 411–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray MG, Brown D (1992) Niche separation of grazing ungulates in the Serengeti: an experimental test. J Anim Ecol 62: 380–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith N (1991) Grazers and browsers: ecological and social contrasts among African ruminants. In: Spitz F, Janeau G, Gonzalez G, Aulagnier S (eds) Ongules/Ungulates 91. SFEPM-IRGM, Toulouse, pp 175–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins RA, Geelen MJH (1971) Rumen characteristics of red deer, fallow deer and roe deer. J Wildl Manage 35: 673–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins RA, Lankhorst A, Hoven W van (1984) Gastro-intestinal fermentation in herbivores and the extent of plant cell-wall digestion. In: Gilchrist FMC, Mackie RI (eds) Herbivore nutrition in the subtropics and tropics. Science Press, Craighall, South Africa, pp 408–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Renecker LA, Hudson RJ (1990) Digestive kinetics of moose (Alces alces), wapiti (Cervus elaphus) and cattle. Anim Prod 50: 51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid CSW, Lyttlejohn JW, Mangan JL (1962) Bloat in cattle. XXIV. A method of measuring the effectiveness of chewing in the release of plant cell contents from ingested feed. N Z J Agric Res 5: 237–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer AL, Young BA, Chimwano AM (1978) Ration digestion and retention times of digesta in domestic cattle (Bos taurus), American bison (Bison bison), and Tibetan yak (Bos grunniens). Can J Zool 56: 2355–2358

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinelair ARE (1983) The adaptations of African ungulates and their effects on community function. In: Bourlier F (ed) Ecosystems of the world 13: tropical savannas. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 401–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinelair ARE (1985) Does interspecific competition or predation shape the African ungulate community. J Anim Ecol 54: 899–918

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods, 6th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Soest PJ van (1982) Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. O and B Books, Corvallis, Ore

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens CE (1988) Comparative physiology of the vertebrate digestive system. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart WE, Stewart DG, Schultz LH (1958) Rates of volatile fatty acid production in the bovine rumen. J Anim Sci 17: 723–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Storm E, Brown DS, Orskov ER (1983) The nutritive value of rumen microrganisms in ruminants. 3. The digestion of microbial amino and nucleic acids in, and losses of endogenous nitrogen from, the small intestine of sheep. Br J Nutr 50: 479–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulyatt MJ, Dellow DW, Reid CSW, Bauchop T (1975) Structure and function of the large intestine of ruminants. In: McDonald TW, Warner ACI (eds) The University of New England Publishing Unit, Armidale, New England, pp 119–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner ACI (1981) Rate of passage of digesta through the gut of mammals and birds. Nutr Abs Rev B 51: 789–820

    Google Scholar 

  • White RG, Trudell J (1980) Patterns of herbivory and nutrient intake of reindeer grazing tundra vegetation. In: Reimers E, Gaare E, Skjenneberg S (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Reindeer/Caribou Symposium, Direktoratet for vilt og ferskvannsfisk, Trondheim, pp 180–195

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, AB9 2QJ, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK

    Iain J. Gordon

  2. Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, EH9 3JT, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

    Andrew W. Illius

Authors
  1. Iain J. Gordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew W. Illius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gordon, I.J., Illius, A.W. The functional significance of the browser-grazer dichotomy in African ruminants. Oecologia 98, 167–175 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341469

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341469

Key words

Search

Navigation